, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 3–152 | Cite as

A parting shot at misunderstanding: Fuller vs. Kuhn

Steve Fuller, Kuhn vs. Popper: The Struggle for the Soul of Science. Cambridge: Icon Books; Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 2003. Pp. 227. £9.99, A$29.95 HB.
  • David Mercer
  • Jerry Ravetz
  • Stephen P. Turner
  • Steve Fuller
Review Symposium

Review Symposium

The Story of H2O?

David Philip Miller,Discovering Water: James Watt, Henry Cavendish and the Nineteenth-century ‘Water Controversy’.Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 2004. Pp. xii+316. £55.00 HB.

By Jan Golinski

Department of History University of New Hampshire USA

By Simon Schaffer

Department of the History and Philosophy of Science Free School Lane University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK

Author’s Response

By David Philip Miller

School of History and Philosophy Science The University of New South Wales Sydney, 2052 Australia

Survey Review

Madness and the Monro dynasty

Jonathan Andrews and Andrew Scull, Undertaker of the Mind: John Monro and Mad-Doctoring in Eighteenth-Century England. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002. Pp xxii + 364. US$35.00 HB.

Jonathan Andrews and Andrew Scull, Customers and Patrons of the Mad-Trade: The Management of Lunacy in Eighteenth-Century London. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003. Pp xvi + 209....


Pharmaceutical Innovation Review Symposium Ashgate Publishing Creative Mind Swarthmore College 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



  1. Adorno, T. The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology, translated by Glyn Adey and David Frisby (New York: Harper and Row, [1969] 1976).Google Scholar
  2. Cole, S. 2001Suspect Identities: A History of Fingerprinting and Criminal IdentificationHarvard University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Conant, J.B. 1947On Understanding Science: An Historical Approach.Yale University PressNew HavenGoogle Scholar
  4. Conant, J.B. 1951Science and Common SenseYale University PressNew HavenGoogle Scholar
  5. Conant, J.B. 1952Modern Science and Modern ManColumbia University PressNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Edmond, G., Mercer, D. 2002“Conjectures and Exhumations: Citations of History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science in US Federal Courts”Law and Literature14309366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edmond, G., Mercer, D. 2004“ Daubert and the Exclusionary Ethos: The Convergence of ‘Corporate’ and ‘Judicial Attitudes’ towards the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Tort Litigation”Law and Policy26231257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuller S.(1985). Bounded Rationality in Law and Science PhD in History & Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh,Google Scholar
  9. Fuller, S. 1988Social EpistemologyIndiana University PressBloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuller, S. 2001“Is There Philosophical Life after Kuhn?”Philosophy of Science68565572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuller, S. 2003“The Critique of Intellectuals in a Time of Pragmatist Captivity”History of the Human Sciences161938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuller, S. 2004a“The Case of Fuller vs Kuhn”Social Epistemology18349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fuller, S. 2004“The Future of Scientific Justice: The Case of the Sceptical Environmentalist.”Futures36631639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fuller, S., Collier, J. 2004Philosophy, Rhetoric and the End of Knowledge2Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale NJ(1st edn. 1993)Google Scholar
  15. Fuller, S. 2000Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our TimesThe University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Guerlac, H. 1963“Some Historical Assumptions about the History of Science”Crombie, A.C. eds. Scientific Change.HeinemannLondon797812Google Scholar
  17. Gutting, G. eds. 1980Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of ScienceNotre DameLondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Haack, S. 2001“An Epistemologist in the Bramble bush: At the Supreme Court with Mr Joiner,”Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law26217248Google Scholar
  19. Hollinger, D. 1996Science, Jews, and Secular Culture: Studies in Mid-Twentieth-Century American Intellectual HistoryPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  20. Horgan, J. 1996The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific AgeAbacusLondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Kirchheimer, O., Neumann, F. 1987Social Democracy and the Rule of LawAllen & UnwinLondonedited by Keith Tribe and translated by Leena Tanner and Keith TribeGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuhn, T.S. 1962The Structure of Scientific RevolutionsChicago University PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Lakatos, I.Musgrave, A. eds. 1970Criticism and the Growth of KnowledgeCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Magee, B. 1974PopperWoburn PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulkay, M., Gilbert, N. 2001“Putting Philosophy to Work: Karl Popper’s Influence on Scientific Practice,”Philosophy of the Social Sciences11389407Google Scholar
  26. Muller, J.Z. 1987The Other God that Failed: Hans Freyer and the Deradicalization of German ConservatismPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  27. Popper, K. 1950The Open Society and Its EnemiesPrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  28. Popper K. “Towards a Rational Theory of Tradition”, in Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge (New York: Harper & Row, [1963]1965), pp. 120–135.Google Scholar
  29. Porter, T. 2004Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical AgePrinceton University PressPrincetonGoogle Scholar
  30. Price, D.K. 1965The Scientific EstateOxford University PressOxfordGoogle Scholar
  31. Ravetz, J.R. 1990Ideological Commitments in the Philosophy of ScienceRavetz, J.R. eds. The Merger of Knowledge with Power: Essays in Critical Science.CassellLondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruse, M. eds. 1996But is it Science/ The Philosophical Question in the Creation/ Evolution ControversyPrometheus BooksNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Stove, D. 1982Popper and After: Four Modern IrrationalistsPergamon PressLondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Windschuttle, K. 1994The Killing of History: How a Discipline is Being Murdered by Literary Critics and Social TheoristsMacleay PressSydneyGoogle Scholar


  1. Cantor, G.,  et al. 2004Science in the Nineteenth-Century Periodical: Reading the Magazine of NatureCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  2. Collins, H.M. 1991“Captives and Victims: Comment on Scott, Richards and Martin”Science, Technology, & Human Values16249251Google Scholar
  3. Fodor J. “Water’s Water Everywhere”, London Review of Books (21 October, 2004), p. 26.Google Scholar
  4. Fyfe, A. 2004Science and Salvation: Evangelical Popular Science Publishing in Victorian BritainThe University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  5. Golinski, J. 2002“Conversations on Chemistry: Talk about Phlogiston in the Coffee House Society, 1780–1787”Levere, T.Turner, G.L’E. eds. Discussing Chemistry and Steam: The Minutes of a Coffee House Philosophical Society 1780–1787.Oxford University PressOxford191205Google Scholar
  6. Jardine, N. 2000“The Uses and Abuses of Anachronism in the History of the Sciences”History of Science38251270Google Scholar
  7. Levine, G. 2002Dying to Know: Scientific Epistemology and Narrative in Victorian EnglandThe University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Lundgren, A. and Bensaude-Vincent, B. (eds), Communicating Chemistry: Textbooks and their Audiences, 1789–1939 (Canton, MA: Science History Publications, 2000).Google Scholar
  9. Putnam, H. 1975“The Meaning of ‘Meaning’”, in Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers Volume 2Cambridge University PressCambridge215272Google Scholar
  10. Scott, P., Richards, E., Martin, B. 1990“Captives of Controversy: The Myth of the Neutral Social Researcher in Contemporary Scientific Controversies”Science, Technology, & Human Values15474494Google Scholar
  11. Secord, J.A. 2000Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of CreationThe University of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Tosh, N. 2003“Anachronism and Retrospective Explanation: In Defence of a Present-Centred History of Science”Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science34647659CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Mercer
    • 1
  • Jerry Ravetz
    • 2
  • Stephen P. Turner
    • 3
  • Steve Fuller
    • 4
  1. 1.Science and Technology Studies School of Social Sciences, Media and CommunicationUniversity of WollongongAustralia
  2. 2.Jerry RavetzBarbicanUK
  3. 3.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  4. 4.Department of SociologyUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations