Advertisement

Metallurgist

, Volume 60, Issue 5–6, pp 471–477 | Cite as

Use of Contemporary Information Technology for Analyzing the Blast Furnace Process

  • N. A. Spirin
  • V. V. Lavrov
  • V. Yu. Rybolovlev
  • A. V. Krasnobaev
  • A. V. Pavlov
Article

Computer implementation of mathematical models, algorithms, and computer programs is given for resolving a set of production problems in the field of blast furnace production introduced into Magnitogorsk Metallurgical Combine. Requirements are considered for the structure and architecture of a computer system for support of solutions adopted for an MES-level Blast Furnace Technologist workstation. A short description is provided for the main model sub-systems, and also assumptions made during mathematical modeling. Use of the systems makes it possible for engineering and production personnel to perform operational analysis of a blast furnace workshop situation, to resolve a number of production problems for controlling blast furnace heat, gas-dynamic, and slag regimes, and also to calculate the optimum blast furnace charge composition, which finally provides an improvement in blast furnace production technical and economic operating indices.

Keywords

BF production automated process control system MES system production situation analysis production problem solution 

References

  1. 1.
    N. A. Spirin (ed.), V. V. Lavrov, V. Yu. Rybolovlev, et al., Models Support Systems for Solutions in a TP Workstation of Blast Furnace Smelting Metallurgy, URFU, Ekaterinburg (2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. P. Onorin, N. A. Spirin (ed.), V. L. Terent’ev, et al., Computer Methods for Modeling Blast Furnace Process, UGTUUPI, Ekaterinburg (2005).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Q. Feng and L. Wang, “Blast furnace hoist charging control system based on ActiveX technology,” Proc. WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies, Wuhan, China, May 7–8, 2013, 46, No. 2, 1853–1858 (2014).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. H. Dimitrov, H. B. Nenov, and A. S. Marinov, “Comparative analysis between methodologies and their software realizations applied to modeling and simulation of industrial thermal processes,” Proc. 36th Int. Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics, MIPRO 2013, Opatija, Croatia, May 20–24, 2013, Art. No. 6596383.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Bartels, Kw. Dohl, H. Uhde, et al., “New process-control computer-system for the blast-furnace plant of an integrated iron and steel works,” Stahl und Eisen, 114, No. 6, 75–79 (1994).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. V. Emel’yanov, S. K. Korovin, L. P. Myshlayev, et al., Theory and Practice of Prediction in Control Systems, IO Rossiiskie Universitety, Kuzbassvuzizdat ASTSh, Kemerovo (2008).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. O. Odintsov, Professional Programming. Systematic Approach, BKhV-Peterburg, St. Petersburg (2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Troelensen, Programming Language C# 5.0 and Platform NET 4.5, Williams, Moscow (2013), 6th ed.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. J. Deit, Introduction to Database Systems, Williams, Moscow (2006).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. A. Spirin, V. V. Lavrov, A. A. Burykin, et al., “Complex of model systems for supporting decisions made in managing blast-furnace smelting technology,” Metallurgist, 54, No. 9–10, 566–569 (2011).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. A. Spirin (ed.), V. V. Lavrov, V. Yu. Rybolovtsev, et al., Mathematical Modeling of Metallurgical Processes in TP Workstation: Teach. Aid, UrFU, Ekaterinburg (2014).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. A. Spirin
    • 1
  • V. V. Lavrov
    • 1
  • V. Yu. Rybolovlev
    • 2
  • A. V. Krasnobaev
    • 2
  • A. V. Pavlov
    • 2
  1. 1.Ural Federal UniversityEkaterinburgRussia
  2. 2.Magnitogorsk Metallurgical CombineMagnitogorskRussia

Personalised recommendations