Advertisement

Metallurgist

, Volume 60, Issue 3–4, pp 460–465 | Cite as

Optimizing the Fabrication of the Titanium Sections of Pressure Vessels

  • E. N. Chumachenko
  • I. V. Logashina
  • I. Yu. Zakhar’ev
Article
  • 51 Downloads

This article discusses research done on modeling, analyzing, and optimizing the technology used to forge the titanium sections of pressure vessels. The finite-element method was used for computer modeling of the deformation of the material during the forging operation. The study examined the forging force, the uniformity of deformation of the vessel’s walls, the filling of the dies, and the probability of crimping. Consideration was given to the possibility of using the phenomenon of superplasticity to forge the given product. The superplastic flow regime is maintained only during the final stage of the forging operation (the last 20% of the stroke of the die) in order to shorten operation as a whole. This is done by setting the die speed at a value which ensures that the material is deformed within a prescribed rate range and that the limits specified for the maximum forces are observed. Several alternatives were examined for making the vessel, these variants differing in the form of the semifinished product and the configuration of the dies. With constraints on the maximum loads and forging time, the technology that was chosen makes it possible to significantly increase the coefficient that characterizes the utilization of titanium in the production process.

Keywords

mathematical modeling titanium spherical tank optimization of manufacturing forging 

References

  1. 1.
    A. J. Barnes, “Superplastic forming 40 years and still growing,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 16, 440–454 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. G. Langdon, ‘Seventy-five years of superplastic research: an overall perspective for the superplasticity conferences,” Key Eng. Mater., 433, 3–8 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. N. Chumachenko, O. M. Smirnov, and M. A. Tsepin, Superplasticity: Materials, Theory, Technologies, LIBROKOM, Moscow (2009).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. A. Vasin and F. U. Enikeev, Introduction to the Mechanics of Superplasticity, Gilem, Ufa (1998).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. I. Novikov, V. S. Zolotarevskii (ed.), V. K. Portnoi, et al., Metals Science: Textbook, ID MISiS, Moscow (2009).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. N. Chumachenko and N. N. Grunin, “Problems with industrial use of the superplasticity of metals and alloys during forming operations,” Metallurg, No. 11, 32–36 (2005).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E. N. Chumachenko, “Development of computer simulation of industrial superplastic sheet forming,” Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 499, No. 1/2, 342–346 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. G. Sanders, “Examination of superplastic forming combined with diffusion bonding for titanium: Perspective from experience,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 13, No. 6, 744–752 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. G. Sanders, M. Ramulu, and P. Edwards, “Superplastic forming of friction stir welds in titanium alloy 6Al-4V: preliminary results,” Materialwiss. Werkstofftech., 39, No. 4–5 353–357 (2008).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. N. Chumachenko and S. E. Chumachenko, “Mathematical modeling of pressure regimes for forming nonlinearly viscous shells with local superplastic flow,” Izv. RAN. Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 6, 134–142 (2000).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. N. Chumachenko
    • 1
  • I. V. Logashina
    • 1
  • I. Yu. Zakhar’ev
    • 1
  1. 1.Moscow Institute of Electronics and MathematicsNational Research University Higher School of Economics (MIEM HSE)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations