Advertisement

Metallurgist

, Volume 56, Issue 9–10, pp 773–778 | Cite as

Ways of improving the quality of the surface of rolled products made of low-carbon structural steel ingots

  • I. V. Rubezhanskaya
  • Yu. A. Pozdnysheva
  • N. A. Zyuban
  • S. A. Pegisheva
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Study of the nature of low-carbon structural steel rolled product surface defects by a metallographic method makes it possible to establish that formation of flaws in rolled product in the bottom part of ingots is connected with the presence of gas bubbles and extraneous inclusions. The effect of aluminum on rolled product surface quality is analyzed. The optimum aluminum content in steels 09G2S – 0.011–0.015%, S355j2G3 – 0.021–0.025% is established, and this makes it possible to improve metal ductility, reduce the degree of ingot defect development, and reduce rolled product rejection for surface defects.

Keywords

low-carbon structural steel bottom casting rolled product surface defect flaws extraneous inclusions aluminum nitride 

References

  1. 1.
    Yu. Aizenkolb, R. Fandrikh, and H. P. Yung, “Contemporary state of ingot casting and remelting,” Chern. Met., No. 1, 33–42 (2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. D. Trofimchuk, Rolled Steel Defects [in Russian], Gos. Nauch.-Tekhn. Izd. Lit. Chern. Tsvet. Met., Moscow (1954).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. M. Novokshchenova and M. I. Vinograd (eds.), Steel Defects: Handbook [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. A. Buryakovskii, Alloy Steel Surface Defects [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1987).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. A. Parshin, Deformability and Quality [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. P. Mukhina and O. N. Zorina, “Prevention of surface defect formation in steel 20 blooms,” Stal, No. 3, 61–62 (1998).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    V. G. Pisarenko et al., “Effect of production factors for rolled product manufacture on the defectiveness of billets of the Krivorozhstal Combine rolling workshop,” Proizvod. Prokata, No. 10, 27–30 (2004).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. S. Kuznetsov et al., “Effect of production factors on structural steel billet surface quality,” Stal, No. 4, 44–46 (2008).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. V. Zezikov, P. M. Shipulin, and V. V. Salomykin, “Study of heating ingot heating and rolling regimes for carbon structural and high quality steels,” Stal, No. 8, 53–54 (1988).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. V. Alchin, V. N. Artyushov, and E. M. Komelnikov, “Improvement of steel S355j2G3 billet quality,” Stal, No. 7, 50–51 (2007).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. N. Tumko, S. V. Revyakin, and N. M. Ternovskaya, “Study of the effect of ingot temperature during charging in heated soaking pits on rolled product surface quality,” Met. Gorn. Prom. No. 2, 48–50 (2001).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. V. Averin, A. V. Revyakin, V. I. Fedorchenko, et al., Nitrogen in Metals [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. V. Rubezhanskaya
    • 1
  • Yu. A. Pozdnysheva
    • 1
  • N. A. Zyuban
    • 1
  • S. A. Pegisheva
    • 1
  1. 1.Volgograd State Technical UniversityVolgogradRussia

Personalised recommendations