Optimizing the production of coke, coal chemicals, and steel on the basis of environmental and energy criteria
- 67 Downloads
The fuel-energy balance of a metallurgical combine is constructed on the basis of an accounting system that extends from receipt of the raw materials to manufacture of the finished product. Coke and coal chemicals production and steelmaking at the combine are optimized with respect to environmental and energy criteria, and geographic information technologies are used to determine the effects of harmful emissions from the combine on the health of the local population.
Key wordsmetallurgical combine coke steel fuel-energy balance optimization harmful emissions effect on the environment population mortality average statistical value of a life geographic information system
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.I. A. Sultanguzin, “Scientific-technical principles of the modeling and optimization of the energy-engineering system at a metallurgical combine,” Engineering Sciences Doctoral Dissertation, MEI, Moscow (2005).Google Scholar
- 3.I. A. Sultanguzin, V. I. Sitas, P. A. Shomov, et al., “Systems analysis of the effect of coke and coal chemicals production on the environmental, economic, and energy indices of a metallurgical combine,” Koks i Khimiya, No. 5, 44–54 (2006).Google Scholar
- 4.V. I. Sitas, I. A. Sultanguzin, I. A. Shomov, et al., “OptiMet software-information system for managing energy and material resources at a metallurgical combine,” Vestn. Mos. Energ. Univ., No. 5, 114–119 (2003).Google Scholar
- 5.I. A. Sultanguzin, V. I. Sitas, P. A. Shomov, et al., “Comparative evaluation of the effects of harmful emissions from a metallurgical combine on the health of the population based on methods for calculating mortality and curtailment of life expectancy,” in: Metallurgical Heat Engineering: Its History, Current State, and Future. In Honor of the Hundredth Anniversary of the Birth of M. A. Glinkov: 3rd Int. Sci.-Techn. Conf., Moscow, February 1–3, 2006, pp. 556–560.Google Scholar
- 6.Energy Use in the Steel Industry, IISI, Brussels, September 1998.Google Scholar
- 7.Energy and Ferrous Metallurgy: Report of the International Institute of Ferrous Metallurgy, VTsP, No. M-01740, Moscow, 4.14.86; Energy and Steel Industry: Report of IISI, Brussels (1982).Google Scholar
- 8.M. V. Isaev and I. A. Sultanguzin, “Numerical modeling of combustion processes in a coke-oven battery,” in: Energy-Saving Technologies in Industry. Furnaces. Ecology. Safety of Production Processes: Proc. 5th Int. Sci.-Techn. Conf., Izd. MISiS, Moscow (2010) (in print).Google Scholar
- 9.O. V. Yuzov and A. M. Sedykh, “Trends in the performance indices of ferrous metallurgy plants in Russia,” Stal, No. 5, 112–116 (2004).Google Scholar
- 10.S. Yu. Kurzanov, I. A. Sultanguzin, Yu. V. Yavorovskii, and V. G. Khromchenkov, “Determination of the yield of gases from a converter based on mathematical modeling of the steelmaking operation,” in: Energy Conservation – Theory and Practice: Proc. 4th All-Russia School-Seminar of Young Scientists and Engineers, Moscow, October 15–17, 2008, Izd. MEI (2008), pp. 280–283.Google Scholar
- 11.N. P. Lyakishev and A. G. Shalimov, Comparative Characteristics of the State of Oxygen-Converter Steelmaking in Russia and Abroad [in Russian], Eliz, Moscow (2000).Google Scholar