Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 51, Issue 12, pp 3081–3096 | Cite as

Stress due to the intercalation of lithium in cubic-shaped particles: a parameter study

  • Rajlakshmi Purkayastha
  • Robert McMeeking
50th Anniversary of Meccanica

Abstract

Recent research into lithium ion battery storage particles has seen the development of many models to predict lithiation stresses generated during operation, and their effects on performance. Due to computational considerations most of the particles studied have idealized geometry with smooth surfaces, such as spheres. In reality, storage particles used in battery electrodes are acicular and have sharp edges and corners. In order to study the effect of these edges and corners on the generation of lithiation stress, we perform a parameter study on the development of lithiation strain and the resulting stress in cubic-shaped particles. We use a previously developed coupled stress-diffusion model, as well as three non-dimensional parameters, to quantify the stress response of cubic-shaped particles as a function of their material properties. Our results show that a change in material properties can lead to differences in both the value of maximum stress as well as its location in the particle. Both lithium insertion into and extraction from the particle are considered.

Keywords

Batteries Lithium-ion Intercalation Extraction Insertion Strain Stress 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research in this paper was supported by a contract with the Robert Bosch Corporation and by a grant from the University of California Discovery Program.

Funding

This study was funded by the Robert Bosch Corporation and by the University of California Discovery Program. Conflict of Interest: RMM has received research contracts from the Robert Bosch Corporation through the University of California. RMM is a Consultant to Robert Bosch GmbH. For employment affiliations of both authors see title page of article.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Huggins RA (2008) Advanced batteries. Materials science aspects. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christensen J, Newman J (2006) A mathematical model of stress generation and fracture in lithium manganese oxide. J Electrochem Soc 153:A1019–A1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vetter J, Novak P, Wagner MR, Veit C, Moeller K-C, Besenhard JO, Winter M, Wohlfahrt-Mehrens M, Vogler C, Hammouche A (2005) Ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sour 147:269–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moon H-S, Lee W, Reucroft PJ, Park J-W (2003) Effect of film stress on electrochemical properties of lithium manganese oxide thin films. J Power Sour 119–121:710–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang D, Wu X, Wang Z, Chen L (2005) Cracking causing cyclic instability of LiFePO4 cathode material. J Power Sour 140:125–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christensen J, Newman J (2006) Stress generation and fracture in lithium insertion materials. J Solid State Electrochem 10:293–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang X, Shyy W, Sastry AM (2007) Numerical simulation of intercalation-induced stress in Li-ion battery electrode particles. J Electrochem Soc 154:A910–A916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Park J, Lu W, Sastry AM (2011) Numerical simulation of stress evolution in lithium manganese dioxide particles due to coupled phase transition and intercalation. J Electrochem Soc 158:A201–A206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng Y-T, Verbrugge MW (2010) Diffusion-induced stress, interfacial charge transfer, and criteria for avoiding crack initiation of electrode particles. J Electrochem Soc 157:A508–A516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng Y-T, Verbrugge M (2009) Evolution of stress within a spherical insertion electrode particle under potentiostatic and galvanostatic operation. J Power Sour 190:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bohn E, Eckl T, Kamlah M, McMeeking RM (2013) A model for lithium diffusion and stress generation in an intercalation storage particle with phase change. J Electrochem Soc 160:A1638–A1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Purkayastha R, McMeeking RM (2012) A linearized model for lithium ion batteries and maps for their performance and failure. J Appl Mech 79(031021):1–16Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Purkayastha R, McMeeking RM (2013) A parameter study of intercalation of lithium into storage particles in a lithium-ion battery. Comput Mater Sci 80:2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aifantis KE, Dempsey JP (2005) Stable crack growth in nanostructured Li-batteries. J Power Sour 143:203–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao K, Pharr M, Vlassak JJ, Suo Z (2010) Fracture of electrodes in lithium-ion batteries caused by fast charging. J Appl Phys 108(073517):1–5Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng YT, Verbrugge MW (2010) Application of Hasselman’s crack propagation model to insertion electrodes. Electrochem Solid State Lett 13:A128–A131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Woodford WH, Chiang YM, Carter WC (2010) ‘Electrochemical shock’ of intercalation electrodes—a fracture mechanics analysis. J Electrochem Soc 157:A1052–A1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bhandakkar TK, Gao H (2010) Cohesive modeling of crack nucleation under diffusion induced stresses in a thin strip: implications on the critical size for flaw tolerant battery electrodes. Int J Solids Struct 47:1424–1434CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hu Y, Zhao X, Suo Z (2010) Averting cracks caused by insertion reaction in lithium-ion batteries. J Mater Res 25:1007–1010ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bhandakkar TK, Gao H (2011) Cohesive modeling of crack nucleation in a cylindrical electrode under axisymmetric diffusion induced stresses. Int J Solids Struc 48:2304–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klinsmann M, Rosato D, Kamlah M, McMeeking RM (2016) Modeling crack growth during Li extraction in storage particles using a fracture phase field approach. J Electrochem Soc 163:A102–A118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klinsmann M, Rosato D, Kamlah M, McMeeking RM (2016) Modeling crack growth during Li insertion in the storage particles using a fracture phase field approach. J Mech Phy Solids 92:313–344ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klinsmann M, Rosato D, Kamlah M, McMeeking RM (2016) Modeling crack growth during Li extraction and insertion during the second half cycle. J Power Sour 331:32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim J-S, Kim KS, Cho W, Shin WH, Kanno R, Choi JW (2012) A truncated manganese spinel cathode for excellent power and lifetime in lithium-ion batteries. Nano Lett 12:6358–6365ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Comsol Multiphysics User’s Guide, Version 4.2a, October 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Oxis Energy Ltd., E1 Culham Science CentreOxfordshireUK
  2. 2.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  3. 3.Materials DepartmentUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA
  4. 4.School of EngineeringUniversity of Aberdeen, King’s CollegeAberdeenUK
  5. 5.INM-Leibniz Institute for New MaterialsSaarbrückenGermany

Personalised recommendations