Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 51, Issue 6, pp 1503–1532 | Cite as

A semi-analytic strategy for the system-level modelling of flexibly supported ball bearings

  • Jakob Fiszer
  • Tommaso Tamarozzi
  • Wim Desmet
Article

Abstract

This work presents a semi-analytic approach that allows to efficiently solve the large sliding or rolling contact problems characteristically associated with the dynamic simulation of flexibly supported ball bearings. The approach separates the bulk deformation, represented by a reduced order model, and the analytically described nonlinear local Hertzian deflections at the contact zone. The interacting raceways of the bearing are represented by B-spline surfaces in order to alleviate the issues of non-smoothness. A solution is introduced that allows an efficient redefinition of these deformed interacting surfaces based on the reduced order model, without necessitating iterative procedures or back-projections to the nodal coordinates. Instead, the deformed B-splines are reconstructed by linear combinations of the control points, utilizing the participation factors of the affected mode shapes in the reduced order model. These B-spline surfaces are exploited by a novel ball bearing specific, and spline-based, contact formulation. The numerical results demonstrate the performance and accuracy of the novel technique for various reduction spaces representing the bulk deformation. Moreover, the developed bearing framework offers both accurate stiffness and displacement patterns with respect to the interfaces to the other bodies in the flexible mechanical system. Through a proper selection and adjustments of the mode shapes, even statically and dynamically complete results can be obtained.

Keywords

Bearing contact dynamics Flexible multibody dynamics  Time-varying contact location Surface smoothing B-splines 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The IWT Flanders is gratefully acknowledged for its support within the SCROLL (120489) and OPTIWIND (120029) projects. This work also benefits from the Belgian Programme on Interuniversity Attraction Poles, initiated by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (DYSCO), and the Research Fund KU Leuven.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersson A, Vedmar L (2003) Dynamic response of a planetary gear system using a finite element/contact mechanics model. J Sound Vib 260:195–212ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andréason S (1973) Load distribution in a taper roller bearing arrangement considering misalignment. Tribology 6(3):84–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arnold M, Brüls O (2007) Convergence of the generalized-\(\alpha\) scheme for constrained mechanical systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 18(2):185–202MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blockmans B, Tamarozzi T, Naets F, Desmet W (2015) A nonlinear parametric model reduction method for efficient gear contact simulations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 102(5):1162–1191. doi: 10.1002/nme.4831 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung J, Hulbert G (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics with improved numerical dissipation: the generalized-\(\alpha\) method. J Appl Mech 60(2):371–375MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corbett C, Sauer R (2014) Nurbs-enriched contact finite elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 275:55–75ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Craig R (1987) A review of time-domain and frequency-domain component mode synthesis methods. J Modal Anal 2(2):59–72Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Boor C (1978) A practical guide to splines. Springer, New York, USACrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Lorenzis L, Wriggers P, Hughes T (2014) Isogeometric contact: a review. GAMM-Mitteilungen 37:85–123MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fiszer J, Tamarozzi T, Blockmans B, Desmet W (2015) A time-dependent parametric model order reduction technique for modelling indirect bearing force measurements. Mech Mach Theory 83:152–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guo Y, Parker R (2012) Stiffness matrix calculation of rolling element bearings using a finite element/contact mechanics model. Mech Mach Theory 51:32–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta P (1984) Advanced dynamics of rolling elements. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harris T, Kotzalas M (2006) Essential concepts of bearing technology, vol 5. Taylor & Francis Group, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones A (1959) A general theory for elastically constrained ball and radial roller bearings under arbitrary load and speed conditions. J Fluids Eng 82(2):309–320Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jones A, Harris T (1963) Analysis of a rolling-element idler gear bearing having a deformable outer-race structure. J Fluids Eng 85(2):273–278Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martinez D, Gregory D (1984) Comparison of free component mode synthesis techniques using MSC/NASTRAN. Technical Report SAND83-0025, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NWGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Mul J, Maas D, Vree J (1989) Equilibrium and associated load distribution in ball and roller bearings loaded in five degrees of freedom while neglecting friction. J Tribol 111(1):142–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parker R, Agashe V, Vijayakar S (2000) Dynamic response of a planetary gear system using a finite element/contact mechanics model. J Mech Des 122(3):304–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Piegl L, Tiller W (1997) The NURBS book, 2nd edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qian W (2013) Dynamic simulation of cylindrical roller bearings. Ph.D. thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Institute for Machine Element and Machine DesignGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schwenkenberg A, Damerau J, Hetzler H, Seemann W (2013) Modeling flexible roller ball bearings in multibody dynamics. In: ECCOMAS conference, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, pp 251–256Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shabana A (2005) Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tamarozzi T, Heirman G, Desmet W (2014) An on-line time dependent parametric model order reduction scheme with focus on dynamic stress recovery. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 268:336–358ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vijayakar S (1991) A combined surface integral and finite element solution for a three-dimensional contact problem. Int J Numer Methods Eng 31:525–545CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weber C, Banaschek K (1953) Schriftenreihe Antriebstechnik, chap 11. Friedr. Vieweg & sohn, NYGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wensing J (1998) On the dynamics of ball bearings. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Department of Mechanical EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wriggers P (2002) Computational contact mechanics. Wiley, West SussexMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations