Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear control in an electromechanical transducer with chaotic behaviour

  • Nonlinear Dynamics and Control of Composites for Smart Engi design
  • Published:
Meccanica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electromechanical transducer considered in this work is composed of a mechanical oscillator linked to an electronic circuit. Simulations results have determined that for some combination of parameters the electromechanical system is subject to chaotic motion with resonant transient behavior, and after the resonant transient the mechanical system (MS) synchronizes with the electrical system (ES). In order to improve the transient response, avoiding both the chaotic and resonant behaviors, a nonlinear control system is designed, a feedback control strategy is used to drive the system into the desired periodic orbit, and a nonlinear feedforward strategy is used to keep the system into the periodic orbit, obtained by the Fourier series. Two control techniques are used and compared, namely: the state dependent Ricatti equation and the optimal linear feedback control. Numerical simulations results are shown in order to compare the results, considering parametric uncertainties. Additionally, the energy transfer “pumping” between the ES and the MS is also analysed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moon FC (1998) Applied dynamics-with applications to multibody and mechatronic systems. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Isermann R (2000) Mechatronic systems: concepts and applications. Trans Inst Meas Control 22:29–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop RH (2006) Mechatronics: an introduction. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tusset AM, Balthazar JM, Bassinello DG, Pontes BR, Felix JLP (2012) Statements on chaos control designs, including a fractional order dynamical system, applied to a “MEMS” comb-drive actuator. Nonlinear Dyn 69:1837–1857. doi:10.1007/s11071-012-0390-6

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearson JD (1962) Approximation methods in optimal control. J Electron Control 13:453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wernli A, Cook G (1975) Suboptimal control for the nonlinear quadratic regulator problem. Automatica 11:75–84

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Tusset AM, Balthazar JM, Felix JLP (2012) On elimination of chaotic behavior in a non-ideal portal frame structural system, using both passive and active controls. J Vib Control 1–11. doi: 10.1177/1077546311435518

  8. Rafikov M, Balthazar JM (2004) On an optimal control design for Rössler system. Phys Lett A 333:241–245

    Article  ADS  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Rafikov M, Balthazar JM, Tusset AM (2008) An optimal linear control design for nonlinear systems. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng XXX(4):279–284

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tusset AM, Balthazar JM, Chavarette FR, Felix JLP (2012) On energy transfer phenomena, in a nonlinear ideal and nonideal essential vibrating systems, coupled to a (MR) magneto-rheological damper. Nonlinear Dyn 69:1859–1880. doi:10.1007/s11071-012-0391-5

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao S (2010) Mechanical vibrations, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shirazi MJ, Vatankhah R, Boroushaki M, Salarieh H, Alasty A (2012) Application of particle swarm optimization in chaos synchronization in noisy environment in presence of unknown parameter uncertainty. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 17:742–753

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Gourdon E, Lamarque CH (2005) Energy pumping with various nonlinear structures: numerical evidences. Nonlinear Dyn 40:281–307

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Gendelman O (2007) Targeted energy transfer in systems with non-polynomial nonlinearity. J Sound Vib 315:723–745

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vakakis AF, Gendelman OV, Bergman LA, McFarland DM, Kerschen G, Lee YS (2008) Nonlinear targeted energy transfer in mechanical and structural systems, solid mechanics and its applications. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nozaki R, Balthazar JM, Marcelo Tusset A, de Pontes BR Jr, Bueno AM (2013) Nonlinear control system applied to atomic force microscope including parametric errors. J Control Autom Electr Syst 24(3):223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tusset AM, Bueno AM, Nascimento CB, Kaster MS, Balthazar JM (2013) Nonlinear state estimation and control for chaos suppression in MEMS resonator. Shock Vib 20:749–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Balthazar JM, Tusset AM, de Souza SLT, Bueno AM (2013) Microcantilever chaotic motion suppression in tapping mode atomic force microscope. Proc Inst Mech Eng 227:1730–1741

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge financial support by FUNDUNESP-GRANT 021/13-DFP, São Paulo Research Foundation—FAPESP (grant: 13/04101-6) and CNPq-both Brazilian research funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Manoel Balthazar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balthazar, J.M., Bassinello, D.G., Tusset, A.M. et al. Nonlinear control in an electromechanical transducer with chaotic behaviour. Meccanica 49, 1859–1867 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-9910-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-9910-4

Keywords

Navigation