Analysis of relationships between residual magnetic field and residual stress
Abstract
The impact of stress on changes in magnetisation is one of the most complex issues of magnetism. Magnetic methods make use of the impact of stress on permeability, hysteresis and magnetic Barkhausen noise, which are examined with fields with a high strength and a small frequency. The paper presents an analysis of the impact of residual stress resulting from inhomogeneous plastic deformations in the notch area of the examined samples on the changes in the strength of the residual magnetic field (RMF). The RMF on the surface of the component is the superposition of the simultaneous effect of the shape, the anisotropic magnetic properties of the material, as well as of the values of the components of a weak external magnetic field (most commonly—the magnetic field of the Earth). Distributions of the RMF components were measured on the surface of samples with a various degree of plastic strain. The finite element method was used to model residual stress in the samples. The impact of residual stress on changes in the residual magnetic field was shown. A qualitative correlation was found between places with residual stress and areas with increased values of the gradients of the RMF components. Further research is now in progress in order to develop the quantitative relationships.
Keywords
Residual magnetic field Residual stress Plastic deformation1 Introduction
Residual stress is the stress which occurs in construction components which are not subjected to external loads. Residual stresses of the first order can arise due to a gradient in plastic deformation caused either by mechanical deformation or by the thermal gradient during cooling [1, 2, 3, 4].
The possibilities of evaluating applied stresses and residual stresses of the first order on the basis of the residual magnetic field (RMF) were indicated in [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. [5, 6, 7, 8] showed the possibility of the stress state evaluation on the basis of RMF measurements. In [6] the relationships between the gradient of the RMF normal component and stress measured with the Xray diffraction method were studied. In [5] the impact of the level and distribution of stress on the values of the RMF components was found for static tensile loads. For varying loads it was found that there was an influence of the stress amplitude and the number of cycles. L.H. Dong et al. [8] and C.L. Shi et al. [9] found a relationship between the gradient of the normal component and previously applied static tension load. S. Changliang et al. [10] report a considerable impact of the notch effect coefficient (the ratio of the max local stress at the notch under external load to the nominal stress without a notch) on the gradient of the normal component of the RMF.
This paper presents an analysis of qualitative relationships between the RMF distributions on the surface of notched samples with plastic deformations and the distributions of calculated values of residual stress. The presented results are a continuation of the research conducted with a view to determining the stress state based on magnetic parameters [3]. They extend the analysis of the relationships between residual stress of the first order and the RMF by a twodimensional problem.
2 Experimental details
Chemical composition of the sample material
Steel grade  Chemical composition of steel (%)  

C  Si  Mn  P  S  N  
S235  max 0.17  –  max 1.40  max 0.045  max 0.045  max 0.009 
The samples were loaded on a tensile testing machine Galdabini Sun 10P. After the desired loads were applied, the samples were unloaded and removed from the testing machine prior to being examined. The examination was always carried out at the same place and with the same position of the sample. 5 samples of each kind were analysed.
2.1 Residual magnetic field measurements
The magnetic field measurements were conducted in the “measuring area” marked in Fig. 1, with a scanning increment of 1 mm along vertical lines which were 4 mm apart from each other. The magnetometer TSC1M4 with the measuring sensor TSC2M supplied by Energodiagnostika Co. Ltd. Moscow was used for the measurements. The instrument was calibrated in the magnetic field of the Earth, whose value was assumed at 40 A/m.

H _{ t,x }—tangential component measured in the direction perpendicular to the applied load,

H _{ t,y }—tangential component measured in the direction parallel to the applied load,

H _{ n,z }—normal component.
2.2 Residual stress calculations
The residual stress values were determined by means of the finite element method (FEM). The software package Ansys 12.1 was used.
The tensile curve for steel S235 was approximated using a multilinear model Fig. 2. The material properties were assumed as isotropic. Due to the small thickness of the samples, the problem was modelled as a twodimensional one, assuming that it was a plane stress state. The numerical model mesh, which fully corresponded to the geometry of the samples, was built on the basis of eightnode quadrangular elements.
The boundary conditions included the fixing of the model on one hand, and the application of tensile loads corresponding to the force set by the strength testing machine on the other.
The way in which the calculations were carried out made it possible to take account of the plastic strain accumulation in each subsequent cycle of the loading of the sample, i.e. the stressstrain state determined in each calculation step constituted the initial state used to determine the stressstrain state in the next step. For the needs of the performed analyses, the results were derived for the area covered by the RMF measurements—Fig. 1.
3 Results and discussion
Due to the magnetoelastic effect, mechanical stress has an influence on the energy anisotropy of magnetic domains, which most often results in changes in permeability. The direction of the anisotropy depends on magnetostriction. For materials with positive magnetostriction, the magnetic moments tend to align in parallel to the direction of tensile stress, and perpendicular to compressive stress. In materials with negative magnetostriction, opposite phenomena occur—the magnetic moments tend to align perpendicular to the direction of tensile stress, and in parallel to compressive stress [12, 13].
The residual magnetic field of a ferromagnetic element, also known as the Self Magnetic Flux Leakage, is the sum of the simultaneous effect of the geometry of the object and of the magnetic, electrical and mechanical properties of the material of which it was made in the magnetic field of the Earth. Due to magnetomechanical coupling, the stress which occurs in the object (both active and residual) has an impact on the RMF. Assuming invariability of the object location in the magnetic field of the Earth, invariability of the Earth’s magnetic field itself (the assumption is not fully true) and lack of significant changes in geometry (there are some slight variations caused by plastic strain), the changes in the RMF of the deformed object are caused by the action of stress resulting from magnetomechanical coupling (Villary’s and Joule’s effect).
In the presented analysis, and assuming positive magnetostriction, both the negative values of residual stress σ _{ X } and the positive values of residual stress σ _{ Y } should cause an increase in tangential component H _{ T,Y }.
Representative results of the RMF measurements in the ‘measuring area” marked in Fig. 1 of samples with plastic deformations are presented in this paper. The location and dimensions of the notch in variant A and B samples are presented in Fig. 1. For variant A samples, the measuring area includes the notch; for variant B samples—the notch is beyond the area. In the immediate vicinity of the notch, the distribution of the RMF gradients depends mainly on the magnetic flux leakage caused by the discontinuity of the material. In the remaining area, the RMF distribution is the result of the impact of a certain distribution of stress and of the properties of the material (such as local changes in structure, chemical composition) which affect magnetic properties. For the onedimensional problem, the possibility of evaluating residual stress based on the gradients of the RMF components is presented in [3]. The presented results are a supplement and continuation of [3]. In further consideration, the concept of the gradient of the RMF component will be understood as its absolute value. Figures 6a to 6i illustrate the distributions of the gradients of the RMF components representative of variant A samples which are measured after unloading for different values of active tensile stress σ understood as nominal stress in the crosssection weakened by the notch. Figures 8a to 8i are representative of variant B samples.
A significant similarity is found between the distributions of the RMF gradients and the distributions of residual stress values. For a variant A sample, the distributions of residual stress σ _{ x } (Figs. 9a, 9c, 9e) resemble a flattened X, and the residual stress distributions σ _{ y } (Figs. 9b, 9d, 9f) look like an elongated X (the centres of X are located on the centre of the notch). In the image of the gradients (especially those of the tangential components H _{ T,Y }—Figs. 6b, 6e, 6h), shapes similar to two X’s can be distinguished, which shows the impact of both σ _{ x } and σ _{ y } residual stress values. For a variant B sample, the distributions of residual stress σ _{ x } (Figs. 10a, 10c, 10e) and residual stress σ _{ y } (Figs. 9b, 9d, 9f) resemble rotated V’s, whose arms come out of the notch. In the image of the gradients, similarly to the sample with the notch in the centre, for gradients of the tangential components H _{ T,Y }—Figs. 8b, 8e, 8h—shapes that look like two V’s can be distinguished. Higher gradient values correspond to higher residual stress values.
Generally, it can be stated that there are qualitative relationships between plastic deformations and the RMF magnitude, as well as between the RMF gradients and residual stress.
4 Conclusions
It is shown that for the samples under analysis the distributions of residual stress components are reflected in the distributions of the RMF gradients. This is particularly visible for the RMF tangential component.
There are qualitative relationships between RMF gradients and residual stress of the first order. This provides a basis for further research aiming at the development of quantitative relationships, whose concept for onedimensional problems is presented in [3] and [23]. The research will make it possible to evaluate the state of the material by means of the RMF measurements for twodimensional problems.
Notes
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
References
 1.Altpeter I, Dobmann G, Kröning M, Rabung M, Szielasko S (2009) Micromagnetic evaluation of micro residual stresses of the IInd and IIIrd order. NDT E Int 42:283–290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 2.Withers PJ, Turski M, Edwards L, Bouchard PJ, Buttle DJ (2008) Recent advances in residual stress measurement. Int J Press Vessels Piping 85:118–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 3.Roskosz M, Bieniek M (2012) Evaluation of residual stress in ferromagnetic steels based on residual magnetic field measurements. NDT E Int 45:55–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 4.McEvily AJ (2002) Metal failures: mechanisms, analysis, prevention. Willey, New York Google Scholar
 5.Roskosz M, Gawrilenko P (2008) Analysis of changes in residual magnetic field in loaded notched samples. NDT E Int 41:570–576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 6.Kuroda M, Yamanaka S, Yamada K, Isobe Y (2001) Evaluation of residual stresses and plastic deformations for ironbased materials by leakage magnetic flux sensors. J Alloys Compd 314:232–239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 7.Wilson JW, Tian GY, Barrans S (2007) Residual magnetic field sensing for stress measurement. Sens Actuators A 135:381–387 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 8.Dong L, Xu B, Dong S, Song L, Chen Q, Wang D (2009) Stress dependence of the spontaneous stray field signals of ferromagnetic steel. NDT E Int 42:323–327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 9.Shi CL, Dong SY, Xu BS, He P (2010) Metal magnetic memory effect caused by static tension load in a casehardened steel. J Magn Magn Mater 322:413–416 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 10.Shi C, Dong S, Xu B, He P (2010) Stress concentration degree affects spontaneous magnetic signals of ferromagnetic steel under dynamic tension load. NDT E Int 43:8–12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 11.Li J, Xu M (2012) Influence of uniaxial plastic deformation on surface magnetic field in steel. Meccanica 47:135–139. doi: 10.1007/s1101201194242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 12.Mierczak LL, Jiles DC, Fantoni G (2011) A new method for evaluation of mechanical stress using the reciprocal amplitude of magnetic Barkhausen noise. IEEE Trans Magn 47(2):459–465. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 13.Yamasaki T, Yamamoto S, Hirao M (1996) Effect of applied stresses on magnetostriction of low carbon steel. NDT E Int 29(5):263–268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 14.Kaminski DA, Jiles DC, Biner SB, Sablik MJ (1992) Angular dependence of the magnetic properties of polycrystalline iron under the action of uniaxial stress. J Magn Magn Mater 104–107:382–384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
 15.Li L, Jiles DC (2003) Modified law of approach for the magnetomechanical model: application of the Rayleigh law to stress. IEEE Trans Magn 39(5):3037 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 16.Jiles DC (1995) Theory of the magnetomechanical effect. J Phys D, Appl Phys 28:1537 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 17.Kashiwaya K (1991) Fundamentals of nondestructive measurement of biaxial stress in steel utilizing magnetoelastic effect under low magnetic field. Jpn J Appl Phys 30:2932 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 18.Schneider CS, Richardson JM (1982) Biaxial magnetoelasticity in steels. J Appl Phys 53:8136 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 19.Sablik MJ, Riley LA, Burkhardt GL, Kwun H, Cannell PY, Watts KT, Langman RA (1994) Micromagnetic model for biaxial stress effects on magnetic properties. J Magn Magn Mater 132:131–148 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 20.Pearson J, Squire PT, Maylin MG, Gore JG (2000) Biaxial stress effects on the magnetic properties of pure iron. IEEE Trans Magn 36(5):3251–3253 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 21.Daniel L, Hubert O (2010) Equivalent stress criteria for the effect of stress on magnetic behavior. IEEE Trans Magn 46(8):3089–3092 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 22.Bulte DP (2009) The pursuit of hysteresis in polycrystalline ferromagnetic materials under stress. IEEE Trans Magn 45(1):83 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
 23.Roskosz M, Bieniek M (2011) Analysis of the similarity between residual magnetic field distribution and the stressstrain state for 7CrMoVTiB1010 (T/P24) steel. In: Rubinacci G, Tamburrino A, Villone F, Takagi T (eds) JSAEM studies in applied electromagnetics and mechanics, Applied Electromagnetic and Mechanics, vol 14, pp 221–222 Google Scholar