Advertisement

Meccanica

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 221–237 | Cite as

Kinematic analysis of a 5-R SP parallel mechanism with centralized motion

  • Ernesto Rodriguez-Leal
  • Jian S. Dai
  • Gordon R. Pennock
Parallel Manipulators

Abstract

The paper presents a kinematic analysis of a parallel mechanism, referred to here as a mechanism with centralized motion. The paper includes a proof, based on the geometry of the mechanism, that the platform exhibits centralized motion. An interesting feature of this parallel mechanism is that it is partially collapsible which may be beneficial in practical applications where storage space is limited. The platform is connected to a base, regarded as fixed in this paper, by five identical legs where each leg is a three-link chain connected by a revolute joint, a spherical joint, and a prismatic joint. The result is that the platform has a screw motion about an axis which is perpendicular to the base and passes through the centroids of the base and the platform, for all positions of the platform. The pitch of the instantaneous screw depends on the platform assembly configuration and is a function of the platform position and orientation. To complete the kinematic study, the paper includes closed-form solutions to the inverse and forward position and velocity problems. Finally, the paper includes several numerical examples to illustrate some of the key features of this novel parallel mechanism.

Keywords

Parallel mechanism RSP architecture Centralized-motion Forward kinematics Inverse kinematics Instantaneous screw axis Jacobian matrix 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gough VE, Whitehall SG (1961) Universal tire testing machine. In: Proc international technical congress FISITA, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, UK, p 117 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stewart D (1965) A platform with six degrees of freedom. Proc Inst Mech Eng 180:371–386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang J, Gosselin CM (1998) Kinematic analysis of singularity loci of spatial four-degree-of-freedom parallel mechanisms using a vector formulation. J Mech Des 120(4):555–558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dai JS, Kerr DR (2000) Six-component contact force measurement device based on the Stewart platform. J Mech Eng Sci 214(5):687–697 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tsai LW (2000) Solving the inverse dynamics of a Stewart-Gough mechanism by the principle of virtual work. J Mech Des 122(1):3–9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gosselin CM, Angeles J (1990) Singularity analysis of closed-loop kinematic chains. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 6(3):281–290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kumar V (1992) Characterization of workspaces of parallel mechanisms. J Mech Des 114(3):368–375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rico JM, Aguilera LD, Gallardo J, Rodríguez R, Orozco H, Barrera JM (2006) A more general mobility criterion for parallel platforms. J Mech Des 128(1):207–219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shai O, Pennock GR (2006) Extension of graph theory to the duality between static systems and mechanisms. J Mech Des 128(1):179–191 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dai JS, Sodhi C, Kerr DR (1994) Design and analysis of a new six-component force transducer based on the Stewart platform for robotic grasping. In: Proc the second Biennial European joint conference on engineering systems design and analysis, ASME PD 64(8-3), London, UK, pp 809–817 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohamed MG, Duffy J (1985) A direct determination of the instantaneous kinematics of fully parallel robot mechanisms. J Mech Transm Autom Des 107(2):226–229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hunt KH (1983) Structural kinematics of in-parallel-actuated robot-arms. J Mech Transm Autom Des 105(4):705–712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waldron KJ, Raghavan M, Roth B (1989) Kinematics of a hybrid series-parallel manipulation system. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 111(2):211–221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clavel R (1988) DELTA, a fast robot with parallel geometry. In: 18th international symposium on industrial robots, Lausanne, France, April 26–28, pp 91–100 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Callegari M, Tarantini M (2003) Kinematic analysis of a novel translational platform. J Mech Des 125(2):308–315 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kong X, Gosselin CM (2004) Type synthesis of 3-DOF spherical parallel mechanisms. Int J Robot Res 23(3):237–245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fang Y, Tsai LW (2004) Structure synthesis of a class of 3-DOF rotational parallel mechanisms. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 20(1):117–121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bi ZM, Lang SYT (2006) Forward kinematic solution and its applications for a 3-DOF parallel kinematic machine (PKM) with a passive link. Robotica 24(5):549–555 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodriguez-Leal E, Dai JS (2007) From origami to a new class of centralized 3-DOF parallel mechanisms. In: Proc ASME international design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference, September 4–7, Las Vegas, Nevada Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saglia JA, Dai JS, Caldwell DG (2008) Geometry and kinematic analysis of a redundantly actuated parallel mechanism that eliminates singularities and improves dexterity. ASME J Mech Des 130(12):124501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hunt KH (1982) Structural kinematics of in-parallel actuated robot-arms. In: Proc ASME design and production engineering technical conference, Washington, DC, Sept 12–15, p 9 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao TS, Dai JS, Huang Z (2002) Geometric analysis of overconstrained parallel manipulators with three and four degrees of freedom. JSME Int J Ser C Mech Syst Mach Elem Manuf 45(3):730–740 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodriguez-Leal E, Dai JS, Pennock GR (2008) Kinematic analysis of a new family of centralized parallel mechanisms. In: Proc second international workshop on fundamental issues and future research directions for parallel mechanisms and manipulators, Montpellier, France, September 21 and 22, pp 57–65 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marble SD, Pennock GR (2000) Algebraic-geometric properties of the coupler curves of the RCCC spatial four-bar mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 35(5):675–693 MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bennett GT (1903) A new mechanism. Engineering 76:777–778 Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Baker JE (1988) The Bennett linkage and its associated quadric surfaces. Mech Mach Theory 23(2):147–156 CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Davidson JK, Hunt KH (2004) Robots and screw theory: applications of kinematics and statics to robotics. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford MATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dai JS, Huang Z, Lipkin H (2006) Mobility of overconstrained parallel mechanisms. J Mech Des 128(1):220–229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Merlet JP (2000) Parallel robots. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ernesto Rodriguez-Leal
    • 1
  • Jian S. Dai
    • 2
  • Gordon R. Pennock
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechatronics and AutomationTecnológico de MonterreyMonterreyMexico
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical Engineering, King’s College LondonUniversity of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.School of Mechanical EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations