Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry

, Volume 368, Issue 1–2, pp 167–172 | Cite as

A missense mutation in CRYGD linked with autosomal dominant congenital cataract of aculeiform type

  • Vanita Vanita
  • Daljit Singh


To detect the underlying genetic defects in two autosomal dominant congenital cataract (ADCC) families, having respectively twenty and four members affected with bilateral congenital cataract. Detailed family history and clinical data were recorded. Mutation screening in twenty three candidate genes including crystallins (CRYAA, CRYAB, CRYBA1/A3, CRYBA2, CRYBA4, CRYBB1, CRYBB2, CRYBB3, CRYGA, CRYGB, CRYGC, CRYGD, and CRYGS), gap junctional channels; connexins (GJA8, GJA3), beaded filament chain proteins (BFSP1, BFSP2), major intrinsic protein (MIP), lens intrinsic membrane protein-2 (LIM2), transcriptional factor (MAF), and in genes encoding for membrane-associated proteins (TMEM114, CHMP4B, EPHA2) was performed by bi-directional sequence analysis of the amplified products. In family A twenty members in six generations were affected by bilateral aculeiform type cataract and in family B four affected members in three generations had granular nuclear cataract. Mutation screening in already known candidate genes by sequence analyses revealed proline to threonine substitution at codon 23 (p.Pro23Thr) in CRYGD for aculeiform type cataract in family A. The family B with four members affected by granular nuclear cataract, however, could not be linked with any of these analyzed 23 candidate genes. The present study describes identification of p.Pro23Thr mutation in CRYGD for aculeiform type cataract in an ADCC family of Indian origin. The identical mutation has previously been reported to be linked with different phenotypes; lamellar cataract, cerulean cataract, coralliform cataract, flaky silica-like nuclear cataract and fasciculiform type cataract in different ADCC families. Interestingly, a mutation of different codon, i.e., p.Arg58His in CRYGD has been reported to be linked with aculeiform cataract in four different families; two from Switzerland, one from Macedonia and in a Mexican family. The findings in present study thus expand the genetic heterogeneity for aculeiform type cataract. Further, exclusion of these twenty three known candidate genes in family B having ADCC of granular nuclear type indicates the role of some other gene apart from for crystallins, gap junction channels, beaded filaments and membrane-associated proteins, and MAF for this phenotype.


Autosomal dominant congenital cataract CRYGD Missense mutation Bi-directional sequence analysis Aculeiform cataract Granular nuclear cataract 



We wish to thank the patients and their relatives for their cooperation. This study was in part supported by grant sanctioned from DBT, India BT/IN/German/13/VK/2010 and Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung BMBF, IND 10/036 under the framework of Indo-German bilateral cooperation for research.


  1. 1.
    Lambert SR, Drack AV (1996) Infantile cataracts. Surv Ophthalmol 40:427–458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reddy MA, Francis PJ, Berry V, Bhattacharya SS, Moore AT (2004) Molecular genetic basis of inherited cataract and associated phenotypes. Surv Ophthalmol 49:300–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vanita V, Singh JR, Singh D (1999) Genetic and segregation analysis of congenital cataract in the Indian population. Clin Genet 56:389–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tardieu A (1988) Eye lens proteins and transparency: from light transmission theory to solution X-ray structural analysis. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 17:47–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wistow GJ, Piatigorsky J (1988) Lens crystallins: the evolution and expression of proteins for a highly specialized tissue. Annu Rev Biochem 57:479–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaffe NS, Horwitz J (1992) Lens and cataract. In: Podos SM, Yanoff M (eds) Text book of ophthalmology, vol 3. Gower Medical Publishing, New York, pp 56–57Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Russell P, Meakin SO, Hohman T, Tsui LC, Breitman ML (1987) Relationship between proteins encoded by three human gamma-crystallin genes and distinct polypeptides in the eye lens. Mol Cell Biol 7:3320–3323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vanita V, Singh D, Robinson PN, Sperling K, Singh JR (2006) A novel mutation in the DNA-binding domain of MAF at 16q23.1 associated with autosomal dominant “cerulean cataract” in an Indian family. Am J Med Genet A 140:558–566PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Santhiya ST, Shyam Manohar M, Rawlley D, Vijayalakshmi P, Namperumalsamy P, Gopinath PM, Loster J, Graw J (2002) Novel mutations in the gamma-crystallin genes cause autosomal dominant congenital cataracts. J Med Genet 39:352–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nandrot E, Slingsby C, Basak A, Cherif-Chefchaouni M, Benazzouz B, Hajaji Y, Boutayeb S, Gribouval O, Arbogast L, Berraho A, Abitbol M, Hilal L (2003) Gamma-D crystallin gene (CRYGD) mutation causes autosomal dominant congenital cerulean cataracts. J Med Genet 40:262–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mackay DS, Andley UP, Shiels A (2004) A missense mutation in the gammaD crystallin gene (CRYGD) associated with autosomal dominant “coral-like” cataract linked to chromosome 2q. Mol Vis 10:155–162PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burdon KP, Wirth MG, Mackey DA, Russell-Eggitt IM, Craig JE, Elder JE, Dickinson JL, Sale MM (2004) Investigation of crystallin genes in familial cataract, and report of two disease associated mutations. Br J Ophthalmol 88:79–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shentu X, Yao K, Xu W, Zheng S, Hu S, Gong X (2004) Special fasciculiform cataract caused by a mutation in the gammaD crystallin gene. Mol Vis 10:233–239PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang LY, Gong B, Tong JP, Fan DS, Chiang SW, Lou D, Lam DS, Yam GH, Pang CP (2009) A novel gammaD-crystallin mutation causes mild changes in protein properties but leads to congenital coralliform cataract. Mol Vis 15:1521–1529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xu WZ, Zheng S, Xu SJ, Huang W, Yao K, Zhang SZ (2004) Autosomal dominant coralliform cataract related to a missense mutation of the gammaD-crystallin gene. Chin Med J (Engl) 117:727–732Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khan AO, Aldahmesh MA, Ghadhfan FE, Al-Mesfer S, Alkuraya FS (2009) Founder heterozygous P23T CRYGD mutation associated with cerulean (and coralliform) cataract in 2 Saudi families. Mol Vis 15:1407–1411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang G, Zhang G, Wu Q, Zhao J (2011) A novel mutation in the MIP gene is associated with autosomal dominant congenital nuclear cataract in a Chinese family. Mol Vis 17:1320–1323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vogt A (1922) Weitere ergebnisse der spaltlampenmikroskopie des vorderen bulbsabschnittes. III. Angeborene und fru¨ therworbene Linsenvera¨nderungen. von Greafes Arch Ophthalmol 107:237–240Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parker C (1956) Spear cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 55:23–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Farmer EJ, Swann PG (1983) Crystalline aculeiform cataract. J Am Optom Assoc 54:913–914PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Héon E, Liu S, Billingsley G, Bernasconi O, Tsifildis C, Shorderet DF, Munier FL (1998) Gene localization for aculeiform cataract, on chromosome 2q33-35. Am J Hum Genet 63:921–926PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heon E, Priston M, Schorderet DF, Billingsley GD, Girard PO, Lubsen N, Munier FL (1999) The γ-crystallins and human cataracts: a puzzle made clearer. Am J Hum Genet 65:1261–1267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zenteno JC, Morales ME, Moran-Barroso V, Sanchez-Navarro A (2005) CRYGD gene analysis in a family with autosomal dominant congenital cataract: evidence for molecular homogeneity and intrafamilial clinical heterogeneity in aculeiform cataract. Mol Vis 11:438–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plotnikova OV, Kondrashov FA, Vlasov PK, Grigorenko AP, Ginter EK, Rogaev EI (2007) Conversion and compensatory evolution of the gamma-crystallin genes and identification of a cataractogenic mutation that reverses the sequence of the human CRYGD gene to an ancestral state. Am J Hum Genet 81:32–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pande A, Pande J, Asherie N, Lomakin A, Ogun O, King J, Benedek GB (2001) Crystal cataracts: human genetic cataract caused by protein crystallization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6116–6120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Evans P, Wyatt K, Wistow GJ, Bateman OA, Wallace BA, Slingsby C (2004) The P23T cataract mutation causes loss of solubility of folded gammaD-crystallin. J Mol Biol 343:435–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jung J, Byeon IJ, Wang Y, King J, Gronenborn AM (2009) The structure of the cataract-causing P23T mutant of human gammaD-crystallin exhibits distinctive local conformational and dynamic changes. Biochemistry 48:2597–2609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pande A, Zhang J, Banerjee PR, Puttamadappa SS, Shekhtman A, Pande J (2009) NMR study of the cataract-linked P23T mutant of human gammaD-crystallin shows minor changes in hydrophobic patches that reflect its retrograde solubility. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 382:196–199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jamieson RV, Perveen R, Kerr B, Carette M, Yardley J, Heon E, Wirth MG, van Heyningen V, Donnai D, Munier F, Black GCM (2002) Domain disruption and mutation of the bZIP transcription factor, MAF, associated with cataract, ocular anterior segment dysgenesis and coloboma. Hum Mol Genet 11:33–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gill D, Klose R, Munier FL, McFadden M, Priston M, Billingsley G, Ducrey N, Schorderet DF, Héon E (2000) Genetic heterogeneity of the Coppock-like cataract: a mutation in CRYBB2 on chromosome 22q11.2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:159–165PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human GeneticsGuru Nanak Dev UniversityAmritsarIndia
  2. 2.Dr Daljit Singh Eye HospitalAmritsarIndia

Personalised recommendations