Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 783–800 | Cite as

A Simple Novel Approach to Valuing Risky Zero Coupon Bond in a Markov Regime Switching Economy

  • Amogh Deshpande


We have addressed the problem of pricing risky zero coupon bond in the framework of Longstaff and Schwartz structural type model by pricing it as a Down-and-Out European Barrier Call option on the company’s asset-debt ratio assuming Markov regime switching economy. The growth rate and the volatility of the stochastic asset debt ratio is driven by a continuous time Markov chain which signifies state of the economy. Regime Switching renders market incomplete and selection of a Equivalent martingale measure (EMM) becomes a subtle issue. We price the zero coupon risky bond utilizing the powerful technique of Risk Minimizing hedging of the underlying Barrier option under the so called “Risk Minimal” martingale measure via computing the bond default probability.


Risky zero coupon bond Longstaff and Schwartz model Markov modulated economy Down-and-Out European Barrier Call option Risk Minimal martingale measure Bond default probability 

AMS 2000 Subject Classifications

91B28 91B70 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Basak G, Ghosh MK, Goswami A (2008) Exotic options in a Markov modulated market (Preprint)Google Scholar
  2. Black F, Cox JC (1976) Valuing corporate securities: some effects of bond indenture provisions. J Finance 31:351–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buffington J, Elliott RJ (2002) American options with regime switching. Int J Theor Appl Financ 5:497–514MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deshpande A, Ghosh MK (2008) Risk minimizing option pricing in a regime switching market. Stoch Anal Appl 26(2):313–324MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Masi GB, Kabanov YM, Runggaldier WJ (1994) Mean-variance hedging of options on stocks with Markov volatility. Theory Probab Appl 39:173–181Google Scholar
  6. Föllmer H, Schweizer M (1990) Hedging of contingent claims under incomplete information. In: Davis MHA, Elliott RJ (eds) Applied stochastic analysis. Stochastics Monographs, vol 5. Gordon & Breach, New York, pp 389–414Google Scholar
  7. Föllmer H, Sondermann D (1986) Hedging of non-redundant contingent claims. In: Hildenbrand W, Mas-Colell A (eds) Contributions to mathematical economics, North-Holland, pp 205–223Google Scholar
  8. Guo X (2001) Information and option pricing. Quant Finance 1:38–44MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kwok Y (1999) Mathematical models of financial derivatives. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  10. Longstaff FA, Schwartz ES (1995) A simple approach to valuing risky fixed and floating rate debt. J Finance 3:789–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mamon RS, Rodrigo MR (2005) Explicit solutions to European options in a regime-switching economy. Oper Res Lett 33(6):581–586MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Merton RC (1974) On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. J Finance 29:449–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Papatheodorou B (2005) Enhanced Monte Carlo methods for pricing and hedging exotic options. University of Oxford thesisGoogle Scholar
  14. Sarig O, Warga A (1989) Some empirical estimates of the risk structure of interest rates. J Finance 46:1351–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schweizer M (1991) Option Hedging for semimartingales. Stoch Process Their Appl 37:339–363MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang JW, Zhang Q (2004) Pricing defaultable bond with regime switching. Contemp Math 351:361–374Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations