Salomon Maimon: Essay on transcendental philosophy. Nick Midgley, Henry Somers-Hall, Alistair Welchman and Merten Reglitz (trans)

Continuum Press, New York, 2010 (orginally 1790), 352 pp., paperback, $24.95, ISBN: PB: 978-1-4411-1384-9
  • Daniela Voss

The philosopher Salomon Maimon (1753–1800), who is widely known for his Autobiography (1792),1 has unfortunately been a rather marginalized figure in philosophy, and his extensive philosophical work, which comprises several books, commentaries and journal articles, unduly neglected. This is all the more surprising, since Maimon was a very active figure on the philosophical scene during his day. Apart from his numerous articles, he kept up correspondence with prominent scholars, such as Reinhold, Ben David and others, though he never held a chair of philosophy himself. Fichte, who can be seen as the main philosophical heir of Maimon’s thoughts, spoke of him with high esteem and confessed his limitless respect toward his talents.2Yet, after his death, Maimon’s oeuvre fell almost completely into oblivion. As Samuel Atlas speculates, Maimon’s critico-skeptical investigations were simply overshadowed by the grandeur and splendor of Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel and their metaphysical...


  1. Atlas, Samuel. 1964. From critical to speculative idealism. The Philosophy of Solomon Maimon. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  2. Baumanns, Peter. 1974. Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre. Probleme ihres Anfangs. Bonn.Google Scholar
  3. Beiser, Frederick C. 1987. The fate of reason–German philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beiser, Frederick C. 2002. German idealism: The struggle against subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bergman, Samuel Hugo. 1967. The Philosophy of Solomon Maimon (trans: Jacobs, N.J.). Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bransen, Jan. 1991. The Antinomy of thought: Maimonian skepticism and the relation between thoughts and objects. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Cassirer, Ernst. 1920. Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, vol. 3. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzsche and philosophy (trans: Tomlinson, H.). London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, Gilles. 1993. The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (trans: Conley, T.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and repetition (trans: Patton, P.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, Gilles. 2003a. Bergson’s Conception of Difference. In Desert Islands and other texts (1953–74), ed. David Lapoujade. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, Gilles (2003b) The Idea of Genesis in Kant’s Esthetics. In Desert Islands and Other Texts (1953–74), New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
  13. Engstler, Achim. 1990. Untersuchungen zum Idealismus Salomon Maimons. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  14. Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 1970. Letter to Reinhold, (March or April) 1795. In Gesamtausgabe; Briefwechsel 1793–5, vol. 3, ed. Reinhard Lauth and Hans Jacob. Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
  15. Franks, Paul. 2000. All or nothing: Systematicity and nihilism in Jacobi, Reinhold, and Maimon. In The Cambridge companion to German idealism, ed. K. Ameriks, 95–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franks, Paul. 2003. Does post-Kantian skepticism exist? In Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus/International Yearbook of German Idealism: Konzepte der Rationalität/Concepts of Rationality, ed. K. Ameriks, 141–163. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  17. Freudenthal, Gideon (ed.). 2003. Salomon Maimon: Rational dogmatist, empirical skeptic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Guéroult, Martial. (1929) La Philosophie transcendantale de Salomon Maimon. Paris.Google Scholar
  19. Katz, Benzion. (1914) Die Erkenntnistheorie Salomon Maimons in ihrem Verhältnis zu Kant. Berlin.Google Scholar
  20. Kuntze, Friedrich. 1912. Die Philosophie Salomon Maimons. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
  21. Maimon, Salomon. 1970. Philosophisches Wörterbuch (1791). In Collected Works, vol. 3, ed. Valerio Verra. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
  22. Maimon, Salomon. 2001. The Autobiography of Solomon Maimon (trans: Murray, J.C.). Chicaco: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  23. Maimon, Salomon. 2010. Essay on transcendental philosophy (trans: Midgley, N. et al.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  24. Schrader, Wolfgang H. 1983. Leibniz versus Kant—Die Leibniz-Rezeption Salomon Maimons. In: Leibniz. Werk und Wirkung. IV. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. ed. Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, Hannover.Google Scholar
  25. Vaihinger, Hans. 1911. Die Philosophie des Als Ob. System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiösen Fiktionen der Menschheit auf Grund eines idealistischen Positivismus. Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Wegener, Richard. 1909. Die Transcendentalphilosophie S. Maimons. Diss. Rostock.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New South Wales UniversitySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Free UniversityBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations