Advertisement

Continental Philosophy Review

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 73–88 | Cite as

At the same time

Continuities in Derrida’s readings of Husserl
  • Robin Durie
Article

Abstract

The essay on Husserl’s phenomenology of touch in Derrida’s recent On Touching—Jean-Luc Nancy represents his only substantial re-engagement with Husserlian phenomenology to be published following the series of texts dating from the period marked by his Mémoire of 1955 through to the essay ‘Form and Meaning’ included in Margins (1972). The essay, devoted to some key sections of Husserl’s Ideas II, appears to break new ground in Derrida’s readings of Husserl, but in fact demonstrates a profound continuity with his earlier readings. In fact, I argue that this continuity is in a part an effect of Derrida’s ongoing commitment to the ‘methodology’ of deconstruction. I show how this commitment leads Derrida to conflate three separate distinctions within Husserl’s discussion, a conflation that obliges Derrida to misread the letter of Husserl’s text, and which, in turn, blinds him to a certain radical potentiality within Husserl’s phenomenology of sensibility.

Keywords

Husserl Phenomenology Derrida Deconstruction Sensibility Touch Time Body Lawlor 

References

  1. Banham, G. (Ed.). (2005). Husserl and the logic of experience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Blanchot, M. (2000). The instant of my death/Derrida, Demeure: Fiction and testimony (Trans. Elizabeth Rottenberg) Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, J. (1962). Édmund Husserl L’Origine de la Géometrie: Traduction et Introduction. Google Scholar
  4. Derrida, J. (1967). L’Écriture et la difference. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  5. Derrida, J. (1967). La voix et le phénomène. Paris: Press Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. (1972). Marges de la philosophie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena (Trans. David Allison). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. (1978a). Writing and difference (Trans. Alan Bass). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, J. (1978b). Edmund Husserl’s ‘origin of geometry’: An introduction (Trans. J. P. Leavey). Brighton: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of philosophy (Trans. Alan Bass). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Derrida, J. (1990). Le Problème de la Genèse dans la Philosophie de Husserl. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. (2000). Le toucher, Jean-Luc Nancy. Paris: Éditions Galilée.Google Scholar
  13. Derrida, J. (2003). The problem of genesis in Husserl’s phenomenology (Trans. Marian Hobson). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Derrida, J. (2005). On touching – Jean-Luc Nancy (Trans. Christine Irizarry). California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Durie, R. (1999). Speaking of time…Husserl & Levinas on the saying of time. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 30, 35–58.Google Scholar
  16. Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time (Trans. Joan Stambaugh). Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  17. Husserl, E. (1952). Ideen, Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution [Husserliana IV]. Edited by Marly Biemel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. (1966). Zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins [Husserliana X], §39. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  19. Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas II: Studies in the phenomenology of constitution (Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and Andre Schuwer). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  20. Husserl, E. (1991). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (18931917) (Trans. John Barnett Brough). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  21. Lawlor, L. (2002). Derrida and Husserl: The basic problem of phenomenology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lawlor, L. (2006). The implications of immanence: Toward a new conception of life. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs (Trans. Richard McCleary). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible (Trans. Alphonso Lingis). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1994). La Nature. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  26. Ricoeur, P. (1951 & 1952). Analyses et problèmes dans Ideen II de Husserl. In Revue de métaphysique et de morale, LVI, 357–394, & LVII, 1–16.Google Scholar
  27. Ricoeur, P. (1967). Husserl: An analysis of his phenomenology (Trans. Edward G. Ballard and Lester E. Embree). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of Exeter ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations