Advertisement

Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 581–593 | Cite as

Air Quality Index Revisited from a Compositional Point of View

  • Eusebi Jarauta-Bragulat
  • Carme Hervada-Sala
  • Juan José Egozcue
Special Issue

Abstract

The so-called Air Quality Index (AQI), expresses the quality of atmospheric air. The overall AQI is determined from the AQIs of some reference air pollutants, which are calculated by a transform of the respective concentrations. Concentrations of air pollutants are compositional data; they are expressed as part of mass of each pollutant in a total air volume or mass. Therefore, air pollution concentration data, as compositional data, just provide ratio information between concentrations of pollutants. Operations involved in the computation of overall AQI are not admissible operations in the framework of compositional data analysis, as they destroy the original ratio information. Consequently, the standard methodology should be reviewed for such calculations, taking into account the principles and operations of compositional data analysis. The objective of this article is to present a first approach to incorporate compositional perspective to air quality expression. For this, it is proposed to use a balance log-contrast of concentrations expressed in \(\upmu \)g/m\(^3\) to define a new kind of air quality indicator. Furthermore, the geometric mean of the concentrations is applied to obtain a new and simple scale air quality index, avoiding definition of piecewise linear interpolations used in the standard AQI computation. As an illustrative example, statistical analysis of atmospheric pollution data series (2004–2013) of the city of Madrid (Spain) has been carried out.

Keywords

Air pollution Air Quality Index Compositional data analysis Log-contrast Balance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain under projects ENE2012-36871-C02-01, partially funded by the European Union, and METRICS Ref. MTM2012-33236; and within the framework of Consolidated Research Group of the Generalitat de Catalunya (Spain) AGAUR 2014-SGR-551. Authors also are thankful to Ayuntamiento de Madrid (Spain) for granting air pollution data.

References

  1. Aitchison J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman & Hall Ltd., LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitchison J, Egozcue JJ (2005) Compositional data analysis: where are we and where should we be heading? Math Geol 37(7):829–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishoi B, Prakash A, Jain V (2009) A comparative study of air quality index based on factor analysis and US-EPA methods for an urban environment. Aerosol Air Qual Res 9:1–17Google Scholar
  4. Bruno F, Cocchi D (2002) A unified strategy for building simple air quality indices. Environmetrics 13:243–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Egozcue JJ (2009) Reply to “On the Harker variation diagrams;..” by J. A. Cortés. Math Geosci 41(7):829–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Egozcue JJ, Jarauta-Bragulat E (2014) Differential models for evolutionary compositions. Math Geosci 46(4):381–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2005) Groups of parts and their balances in compositional data analysis. Math Geol 37(7):795–828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2011a) Análisis composicional de datos en ciencias geoambientales. Boletín Geológico y Minero 122(4):439–452Google Scholar
  9. Egozcue JJ, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2011b) Basic concepts and procedures. In: Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Buccianti A (eds) Compositional data analysis. Theory and applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Pearson K (1897) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution on a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London LX, pp 489–502Google Scholar
  11. Plaia A, Di Salvo F, Ruggieri M, Agró G (2013) A multisite-multipollutant air quality index. Atmos Environ 70:387–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Plaia A, Ruggieri M (2011) Air quality indices: a review. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 10:165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Russo A, Soares A (2014) Hybrid model for urban air pollution forecasting: a stochastic spatio-temporal approach. Math Geosci 46:75–93Google Scholar
  14. The World Bank (2013) Report. on line. data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZSGoogle Scholar
  15. van den Elshout S, Léger K, Nussio F (2008) Comparing urban air quality in europe in real time. A review of existing air quality indices and the proposal of a common alternative. DCMR Environ Int 34:720–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eusebi Jarauta-Bragulat
    • 1
  • Carme Hervada-Sala
    • 2
  • Juan José Egozcue
    • 1
  1. 1.Departament de Matemàtica Aplicada III, ETS Enginyers de Camins, Canals i Ports de BarcelonaUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Departament de Física i Enginyeria Nuclear, Escola d’Enginyeria de TerrassaUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaTerrassaSpain

Personalised recommendations