Advertisement

Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 193–225 | Cite as

Characterization of Non-Gaussian Geologic Facies Distribution Using Ensemble Kalman Filter with Probability Weighted Re-Sampling

  • Siavash Nejadi
  • Juliana Leung
  • Japan Trivedi
Article

Abstract

The Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) is a Monte Carlo-based technique for assisted history matching and real-time updating of reservoir models. However, it often fails to detect precise locations of distinct facies boundaries and their proportions, as the facies distributions are non-Gaussian, while geologic data for reservoir modeling is usually insufficient. In this paper, a new re-sampling step is introduced to the conventional EnKF formulation; after certain number of assimilation steps, the updated ensemble is used to generate a new ensemble with a novel probability weighted re-sampling scheme. The new ensemble samples from a probability density function that is conditional to both the geological information and the early production data. After the re-sampling step, the forecast model is applied to the new ensemble from the beginning up to the last update step (without any intermediate Kalman updates). Full EnKF is again applied on the ensemble members to assimilate the remaining production history. Combination of EnKF and regenerating new members using the re-sampling method demonstrates reasonable improvement and reduction of uncertainty in history matching of reservoir models with multiple facies. The histogram and the experimental variogram of the updated ensemble members are more consistent with the static geologic information. Moreover, the technique helps maintaining ensemble variance which is essential for uncertainty estimation in the posterior probability distribution of facies proportions.

Keywords

Non-Gaussian distributions Facies characterization Dynamic data integration History matching Ensemble methods Re-sampling techniques 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant and Alberta Innovates Technology Futures (AITF). Academic licenses for ECLIPSE reservoir simulator was provided by Schlumberger.

References

  1. Aanonsen SI, Nævdal G, Oliver DS, Reynolds AC, Valles B (2009) The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering—a review. SPE J 14(3):393–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agbalaka C, Oliver DS (2008) Application of the EnKF and localization to automatic history matching of facies distribution and production data. Math Geosci 40(4):353–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson JL (2001) An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon Wea Rev 129: 2884–2903Google Scholar
  4. Arroyo E, Devegowda D, Datta-Gupta A, Choe J (2008) Streamline-assisted ensemble Kalman filter for rapid and continuous reservoir model updating. SPE Res Eval Eng 11(6):1046–1060Google Scholar
  5. Boisvert JB, Pyrcz MJ, Deutsch CV (2008) Multiple-point statistics for training image selection. Nat Resour Res 16(4):313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgers G, van Leeuwen PJ, Evensen G (1998) Analysis scheme in the ensemble Kalman filter. Mon Weather Rev 126:1719–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang H, Zhang D, Lu Z (2010) History matching of facies distribution with the EnKF and level set parameterization. J Comput Phys 229:8011–8030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Oliver D (2010) Cross-covariances and localization for EnKF in multiphase flow data assimilation. Comput Geosci 14(4):579–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Oliver D (2012) Ensemble randomized maximum likelihood method as an iterative ensemble smoother. Math Geosci 44(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Zhang D (2006) Data assimilation for transient flow in geologic formations via ensemble Kalman filter. Adv Water Resour 29(8):1107–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cressie N (1985) Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares. Math Geol 17(5):563–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1997) GSLIB: Geostatistical software library and user’s guide, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Dovera L, Della Rossa E (2010) Multimodal ensemble Kalman filtering using Gaussian mixture models. Comput Geosci 15(2):307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evensen G (1994) Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics. J Geophys Res 99(C5):10143–10162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evensen G (2003) The ensemble Kalman filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation. Ocean Dynam 53:343–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evensen G (2007) Data assimilation: the ensemble Kalman filter. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Emerick AA, Reynolds AC (2011) Combining sensitivities and prior information for covariance localization in the ensemble Kalman filter for petroleum reservoir applications. Comput Geosci 15(2):251–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emerick AA, Reynolds AC (2012) Combining the ensemble Kalman filter with Markov Chain Monte Carlo for improved history matching and uncertainty characterization. SPE J 17(2):418–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emerick AA, Reynolds AC (2013) Investigation of the sampling performance of ensemble-based methods with a simple reservoir model. Comput Geosci 17(2):325–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furrer R, Bengtsson T (2007) Estimation of high-dimensional prior and posterior covariance matrices in Kalman filter variants. J Multiva Anal 98(2):227–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gu Y, Oliver DS (2007) An iterative ensemble Kalman filter for multiphase fluid flow data assimilation. SPE J 12(4):438–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jafarpour B, McLaughlin DB (2008) History matching with an ensemble Kalman filter and discrete cosine parameterization. Comput Geosci 12(2):227–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jafarpour B, Tarrahi M (2011) Assessing the performance of the ensemble Kalman filter for subsurface flow data integration under variogram uncertainty. Water Resour Res 47(5):W05537Google Scholar
  24. Jain AK (1988) Fundamentals of digital image processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  25. Li G, Reynolds AC (2009) Iterative ensemble Kalman filters for data assimilation. SPE J 14(3):496–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li L, Zhou H, Hendricks Franssen HJ, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2012) Pattern recognition in a bimodal aquifer using the normal-score ensemble Kalman filter. Math Geosci 44(2):169–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu N, Oliver DS (2005) Ensemble Kalman filter for automatic history matching of geologic facies. J Pet Sci Eng 47(3–4):147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lorentzen RJ, Fjelde KK, Froyen J, Lage AC, Nævdal G, Vefring EH (2001) Underbalanced and low-head drilling operations: real time interpretation of measured data and operational support (SPE 71384). In: Proceedings of SPE annual technical conference and exhibitionGoogle Scholar
  29. Lorentzen RJ, Flornes KM, Nævdal G (2012) History matching channelized reservoirs using the ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J 17(1):137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mood AM (1940) The distribution of runs. Ann Math Stat 11(4):367–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moreno D, Aanonsen SI (2011) Continuous facies updating using the ensemble Kalman filter and the level set method. Math Geosci 43(8):951–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Myrseth I, Sætrom J, More H (2012) Resampling the ensemble Kalman filter. Comput Geosci 55:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nejadi S, Trivedi J, Leung J (2011). Improving characterization and history matching using entropy weighted ensemble Kalman filter for non-Gaussian distributions (SPE 144578). In: Proceedings of SPE Western North American regional meetingGoogle Scholar
  35. Nejadi S, Trivedi J, Leung J (2012a) Ensemble Kalman filter predictor bias correction method for non-Gaussian geological facies detection. In: Proceedings of IFAC conference on automatic control in offshore oil and gas production (ACOOG 2012)Google Scholar
  36. Nejadi S, Leung J, Trivedi J (2012b) Integration of production data for estimation of natural fracture properties in tight gas reservoirs using ensemble Kalman filter (SPE 162783). In: Proceedings of Canadian unconventional resources conferenceGoogle Scholar
  37. Nejadi S, Trivedi J, Leung J (2014) Estimation of geological facies boundaries using categorical indicators with P-Field simulation and ensemble Kalman filter. Nat Resour Res. doi: 10.1007/s11053-014-9233-0
  38. Oliver D, Chen Y (2011) Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review. Comput Geosci 15(1): 185–221Google Scholar
  39. Oliver DS, Cunha LB, Reynolds AC (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conditioning a permeability field to pressure data. Math Geol 29(1):61–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oliver DS, Reynolds AC, Liu N (2008) Inverse theory for petroleum reservoir characterization and history matching. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rao KR, Yip P (1990) Discrete cosine transform: algorithms, advantages, applications. Academic Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  42. RamaRao BS, LaVenue AM, de Marsily G, Marietta MG (1995) Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields 1. Theory and computational experiments. Water Resour Res 31(3):475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Remy N, Boucher A, Wu J (2009) Applied geostatistics with SGeMS: a user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saleri NG, Toronyi RM, Shyder DE (1992) Data and data hierarchy. J Pet Tech 44(12):1286–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sarma P, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K (2008) Kernel principal component analysis for efficient, differentiable parameterization of multipoint geostatistics. Math Geosci 40(1):3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sarma P, Durlofsky LJ, Aziz K, Chen WH (2007) A new approach to automatic history matching using Kernel PCA (SPE 106176). In: Proceedings of SPE reservoir simulation symposiumGoogle Scholar
  47. Schlumberger Information Solutions (2011) Eclipse reservoir simulator: reference manual and technical description. http://www.slb.com
  48. van Leeuwen PJ (2003) A variance-minimizing filter for large-scale applications. Mon Weather Rev 131: 2071–2084Google Scholar
  49. Zafari M, Reynolds AC (2007) Assessing the uncertainty in reservoir description and performance predictions with the ensemble Kalman filter. SPE J 12(3):382–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mining and Petroleum EngineeringUniversity of Alberta, Markin/CNRL Natural Resources Engineering FacilityEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations