Advertisement

Mathematical Geosciences

, Volume 40, Issue 8, pp 875–885 | Cite as

Extended Probability Perturbation Method for Calibrating Stochastic Reservoir Models

  • Lin Y. Hu
Article

Abstract

Calibrating a stochastic reservoir model on large, fine-grid to hydrodynamic data requires consistent methods to modify the petrophysical properties of the model. Several methods have been developed to address this problem. Recent methods include the Gradual Deformation Method (GDM) and the Probability Perturbation Method (PPM). The GDM has been applied to pixel-based models of continuous and categorical variables, as well as object-based models. Initially, the PPM has been applied to pixel-based models of categorical variables generated by sequential simulation. In addition, the PPM relies on an analytical formula (known as the tau-model) to approximate conditional probabilities. In this paper, an extension of the PPM to any type of probability distributions (discrete, continuous, or mixed) is presented. This extension is still constrained by the approximation using the tau-model. However, when applying the method to white noises, this approximation is no longer necessary. The result is an entirely new and rigorous method for perturbing any type of stochastic models, a modified PPM employed in similar manner to the GDM.

Keywords

Geostatistical simulation Inverse problem Hydrodynamic data Dirac distribution Randomization of distribution Gradual deformation method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caers J (2003) Geostatistical history matching under training-image based geological model constraints. SPE J 8(3):218–226 Google Scholar
  2. Caers J (2007) Comparison of the gradual deformation with probability perturbation method for solving inverse problems. Math Geol 39(1):27–52 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feller W (1971) An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol II. Wiley, New York, 669 p Google Scholar
  4. Hu LY (2000) Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of Gaussian-related stochastic models. Math Geol 32(1):87–108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hu LY, Blanc G, Noetinger B (2001) Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of sequential stochastic simulations. Math Geol 33(4):475–489 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Journel A (2002) Combining knowledge from diverse information sources: an alternative to Bayesian analysis. Math Geol 34(5):573–596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Reservoir Engineering DivisionIFPRueil-Malmaison CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations