Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 659–665 | Cite as

Theory and Practice in Mathematical Geology—Introduction and Discussion

  • Hannes Thiergärtner
Article

Abstract

Mathematical geology has developed into a very diverse system of mathematical models, algorithms and corresponding software. Experience shows that this diversification of approaches and methods was and is accompanied by an increasing gap between the availability of powerful tools and the continuation of many traditional working methods in the geosciences. Besides continuing to develop models, one of the basic functions of mathematical geology should be to introduce all new tools into practice and to aid non-specialized geoscientists to use them successfully and without bias. Some ways to do so will be briefly discussed here. Instructive and intelligible contributions towards attaining this goal were presented at the last (32nd) International Geological Congress held in Florence, Italy, in 2004. The intention of this present compilation is to suggest relevant discussions and conclusions. Mathematical geology should not be the domain of a few experts. It should be made accessible to all geologists and scientists in related fields.

Keywords

modeling geosciences mathematics practical application 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cressie, N., 1991, Statistics for spatial data: John Wiley, New York, 900 p.Google Scholar
  2. Davis, J. C., 1993, Preface, in Davis, J. C., and Herzfeld, U. C., eds, Computers in geology—25 years of progress: Oxford University Press, New York, p. vii–viii.Google Scholar
  3. Griffith, J. C., 1966, Future trend in geomathematics: Miner. Ind. (University Park)., v. 35, no. 5, p. 1–8.Google Scholar
  4. Merriam, D. F., 1978, The International Association for Mathematical Geology—a brief history and record of accomplishments, in Merriam, D. F., ed., Geomathematics—past, present, and prospects: Department of Geology, Syracuse University, p. 1–6.Google Scholar
  5. Thiergärtner, H., 1995, Correct modelling of groundwater contaminations: Matematické metody v geologii, Prague, v. MD, p. 1–10.Google Scholar
  6. Thiergärtner, H., 2005, Theses on the subject of mathematical geology: Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, Stuttgart, v. 155, no. 2–4, p. 195–202.Google Scholar
  7. Webster, R., and Oliver, M. A., 2000, Geostatistics for environmental scientists: John Wiley, Chichester, 271 p.Google Scholar
  8. Whitten, E. H. T., 2005, A half century of mathematical geology—the new threshold: Zeitschrift der deutschen geologischen Gesellschaft, Stuttgart, v. 155, no. 2–4, p. 203–209.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological SciencesFree University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations