Skip to main content
Log in

Fractally Invariant Distributions and an Application in Geochemical Exploration

  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fractal modelling has been applied extensively as a means of characterizing the spatial distribution of geological phenomena that display self-similarity at differing scales of measurement. A fractal distribution exists where the number of objects exhibiting values larger than a specified magnitude displays a power-law dependence on that magnitude, and where this relationship is scale-invariant. This paper shows that a number of distributions, including power-function, Pareto, log-normal and Zipf, display fractal properties under certain conditions and that this may be used as the mathematical basis for developing fractal models for data exhibiting such distributions. Population limits, derived from fractal modelling using a summation method, are compared with those derived from more conventional probability plot modelling of stream sediment geochemical data from north-eastern New South Wales. Despite some degree of subjectivity in determining the number of populations to use in the models, both the fractal and probability plot modelling have assisted in isolating anomalous observations in the geochemical data related to the occurrence of mineralisation or lithological differences between sub-catchments. Thresholds for the main background populations determined by the fractal model are similar to those established using probability plot modelling, however the summation method displays less capacity to separate out anomalous populations, especially where such populations display extensive overlap. This suggests, in the geochemical data example provided, that subtle differences in the population parameters may not significantly alter the fractal dimension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahrens, L. H., 1954a, The lognormal distribution of the elements (a fundamental law of geochemistry and its subsidiary): Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 5, p. 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahrens, L. H., 1954b, The lognormal distribution of the elements: II: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 6, p. 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., and Brown, J. A. C., 1957, The lognormal distribution: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 176 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. G., Brownlow, J., Alder, D., Facer, R., Oakes, G., Suppel, D. W., Stroud, J., O’Dea, T., and Hollands, K., 1996, Mineral resources: Regional report of upper north east New South Wales: v. 5. Socio-economic values: Resource and Conservation Assessment Council, Sydney, p. 73–154.

  • Burrough, P. A., 1983, Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil: I. The application of fractal concepts to nested levels of soil variation: J. Soil Sci., v. 34, p. 577–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., 1999, Spatial and scaling modelling for geochemical anomaly separation: J. Geochem. Explor., v. 65, p. 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Q., Agterberg, F. P., and Ballantyne, S. B., 1994, The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods: J. Geochem. Explor., v. 51, p. 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, C. B., and Paul, R. L., 1995, Fractals in petroleum geology and earth process: Plenum Press, New York, 317 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, A. P., and Cohen, D. R., 2001, An unsupervised neural network approach to the analysis of multi-element stream sediment data, Northeastern NSW, Australia: Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal., v. 1, p. 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. R., Silva-Santisteban, C. M., Rutherford, N. F., Garnett, D. L., and Waldron, H. M., 1999, Comparison of vegetation and stream sediment geochemical patterns in the north eastern region of New South Wales: J. Geochem. Explor., v. 66, p. 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. R., Rutherford, N. F., Garnett, D. G., and Waldron, H. M., 1995, Geochemical survey of the upper NE region of NSW: Geological Survey of New South Wales and the Natural Resources Audit Council, 310 p., 2 vols., 39 maps.

  • Crovelli, R. A., Schmoker, J. W., and Balay, R. H., 1997, U.S. Department of the interior U.S. geological survey: Fractal lognomal percentage analysis of U.S. geological survery’s 1995 national assessment of conventional oil and gas resources: Nonrewable Resources, v. 6, p. 43–51.

  • Crow, E. L., and Shimizu, K., 1988, Lognormal distributions—Theory and applications: Marcel Dekker, New York, 387 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devoto, D., and Martínez, S., 1998, Truncated Pareto law and oresize distribution of ground rocks: Math. Geol., v. 30, p. 661–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. G., 1989, The chi-square plot: A tool for multivariate outlier recognition: J. Geochem. Explor., v. 32, p. 319–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, P. A., Howard, C. B., Walsh, J. J., and Watterson, J., 1993, Measurement and characterization of spatial distributions of fractures: Technophysics, v. 226, p. 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, G., 1967, The Pareto law and the pyramid distribution: Publication 505, Shell Development, Houston, Texas.

  • Gonçales, M. A., 2001, Characterisation of geochemical distributions using multifractal models: Math. Geol., v. 33, p. 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govett, G. J. S., Goodfellow, W. D., Chapman, R. P., and Chork, C. Y., 1975: Exploration geochemistry distribution of elements and recognition of anomalies: Math. Geol., v. 7, p. 415–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunsky, E. C., and Agterberg, F. P., 1988, Spatial and multivariate analysis of geochemical data from metavolcanic rocks in the Ben Nevis Area, Ontario: Math. Geol., v. 7, p. 415–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, H. M., and Sugihara, G., 1993, Fractals: A user’s guide for the natural sciences: Oxford University Press, Oxford, 316 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, N. L., and Kotz, S., 1969, Discrete distributions: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 328 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, N. L., and Kotz, S., 1970, Continuous univariate distributions: I: John Wiley & Sons, New York, 300 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, L., and Bhaumik, B. K., 1997, Improved estimation of the box–cox transform parameter and its application to hydrogeochemical data: Math. Geol., v. 29, p. 963–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korvin, G., 1992, Fractal models in the earth sciences: Elsevier, Amsterdam, 396 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, A. M., and Kelton, W. D., 1991, Simulation modelling and analysis, 2nd ed.: McGraw-Hill, New York, 759 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logdson, S. D., 1995, Analysis of aggregate fractal dimensions and aggregate densities back-calculated from hydraulic conductivity: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., v. 59, p. 1216–1221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B., 1966, Forecasts of future prices, unbiased markets, and “martingale” models: J. Business, v. 39, p. 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B., 1967. The variation of some other speculative prices: J. Business, v. 40, p. 393–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B. B., 1982, The fractal geometry of nature: W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 460 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miesch, A. T., 1981, Estimation of the geochemical threshold and its statistical significance: J. Geochem. Explor., v. 16, p. 49–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Normant, F., and Tricot, C., 1993, Fractal simplification of lines using convex hulls: Geogr. Anal., v. 25, p. 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, W., and Zhao, P. D., 1998, Theory study of fractal statistical model and its application in geology: Sci. Geol. Sinica, v. 33, p. 234–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. J., 1991, A fundamental approach to threshold estimation in exploration geochemistry. Probability plots revisited: J. Geochem. Explor., v. 41, p. 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, C. R., 1987, PROBPLOT: An interactive computer program to fit mixtures of normal (or log-normal) distributions with maximum likelihood optimization procedures: Association of Exploration Geochemists, Nepean, Ontario, Canada, special volume 14.

  • Turcotte, D. L., 1997, Fractals and chaos in geology and geophysics, 2nd ed.: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 398 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Shen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, W., Cohen, D.R. Fractally Invariant Distributions and an Application in Geochemical Exploration. Math Geol 37, 895–913 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-9222-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-9222-6

Key Words

Navigation