Advertisement

Mathematical Geology

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 445–464 | Cite as

Quantifying Uncertainty in Mineral Resources by Use of Classification Schemes and Conditional Simulations

  • Xavier Emery
  • Julián M. Ortiz
  • Juan J. Rodríguez
Article

Abstract

Mineral inventory determination consists of estimating the amount of mineral resources on a block-by-block basis and classifying individual blocks into categories with increasing level of geologic confidence. Such classification is a crucial issue for mining companies, investors, financial institutions, and authorities, but it remains subject to some confusion because of the wide variations in methodologies and the lack of standardized procedures. The first part of this paper considers some of the criteria used to classify resources in practice and their impact through a sensitivity study using data from a Chilean porphyry copper deposit. Five classification criteria are compared and evaluated, namely: Search neighborhoods, absolute and relative kriging variances, absolute and relative conditional simulation variances. It is shown that some classification criteria either favor or penalize the high-grade areas if the grade distribution presents a proportional effect. In the second part of the paper, conditional simulations are used to quantify the uncertainty on the overall mineral resources. This approach is promising for risk analysis and decision-making. Unlike linear kriging, simulations allow inclusion of a cutoff grade in the calculation of the resources and also provide measures of their joint uncertainty over production volumes.

Keywords

resource classification mineral inventory geostatistics kriging conditional simulations proportional effect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Annels, A. E., and Dominy, S. C., 2003, Core recovery and quality: Important factors in mineral resource estimation: Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. Sect. B Appl. Earth Sci., v. 112, no. 3, p. 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackwell, G. H., 1998, Relative kriging errors—A basis for mineral resource classification: Explor. Min. Geol., v. 7, no. 1–2, p. 99–106.Google Scholar
  3. Chilés, J. P., and Delfiner, P., 1999, Geostatistics: Modeling spatial uncertainty: Wiley, New York, 695 p.Google Scholar
  4. CIM, 2000, CIM standards on mineral resources and reserves—Definitions and guidelines. Prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions: CIM Bull., v. 93, no. 1044, p. 53–61.Google Scholar
  5. CSA, 2001, Standards of disclosure for mineral projects: National Instrument 43–101, Canadian Securities Administration, 22 p.Google Scholar
  6. David, M., 1988, Handbook of applied advanced geostatistical ore reserve estimation: Elsevier, Amsterdam, 216 p.Google Scholar
  7. Diehl, P., and David, M., 1982, Classification of ore reserves/resources based on geostatistical methods: CIM Bull., v. 75, no. 838, p. 127–136.Google Scholar
  8. Dohm, C., 2005, Quantifiable mineral resource classification-A logical approach, in Leuangthong, O., and Deutsch, C. V., eds., Geostatistics Banff/2004: Springer, Dordrecht, v. 1, p. 333–342.Google Scholar
  9. Dominy, S. C., Noppé, M. A., and Annels, A. E., 2002, Errors and uncertainty in mineral resource and ore reserve estimation: The importance of getting it right: Explor. Min. Geol., v. 11, no. 1–4, p. 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emery, X., 2002, Conditional simulation of nongaussian random functions: Math. Geol., v. 34, no. 1, p. 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emery, X., 2005, Conditional simulation of random fields with bivariate gamma isofactorial distributions: Math. Geol., v. 37, no. 4, p. 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emery, X., and Ortiz, J. M., 2005, Histogram and variogram inference in the multigaussian model: Stochastic environmental research and risk assessment, v. 19, no. 1, p. 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EURO, 2002, Code for reporting of mineral exploration results, mineral resources and mineral reserves (the European code): Report prepared by the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy Working Group on Resources and Reserves in conjunction with the European Federation of Geologists and the Institute of Geologists of Ireland, 34 p.Google Scholar
  14. Froidevaux, R., Roscoe, W. E., and Valiant, R. I., 1986, Estimating and classifying gold reserves at Page-Williams C zone: A case study in nonparametric geostatistics, in David, M., Froidevaux, R., Sinclair, A. J., and Vallée, M., eds., Proceedings of the Symposium on Ore reserve estimation—Methods, models and reality: Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum, Montreal, p. 280–300.Google Scholar
  15. Goovaerts, P., 1997, Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation: Oxford University Press, New York, 480 p.Google Scholar
  16. JORC, 2004, Australasian Code for reporting of exploration results, mineral resources and ore reserves (the JORC Code, 2004 Edition): Report prepared by the Joint Ore Reserve Committee of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia, 21 p.Google Scholar
  17. Journel, A. G., and Huijbregts, C. J., 1978, Mining geostatistics: Academic Press, London, 600 p.Google Scholar
  18. Matheron, G., 1973, The intrinsic random functions and their applications: Adv. Appl. Probab., v. 5, p. 439–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matheron, G., 1984, The selectivity of the distributions and the “second principle” of geostatistics, in Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A. G., and Maréchal, A., eds., Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: Reidel, Dordrecht, v. 1, p. 421–433.Google Scholar
  20. Rendu, J. M., and Miskelly, N., 2001, Mineral resources and mineral reserves: Progress on international definitions and reporting standards: Trans. Inst. Min. Metall. Sect. A Min. Technol., v. 110, p. 133–138.Google Scholar
  21. Royle, A. G., 1977, How to use geostatistics for ore reserve classification: Eng. Min. J., v. 30, p. 52–55.Google Scholar
  22. Sabourin, R., 1984, Application of a geostatistical method to quantitatively define various categories of resources, in Verly, G., David, M., Journel, A. G., and Maréchal, A., eds., Geostatistics for natural resources characterization: Reidel, Dordrecht, v. 1, p. 201–215.Google Scholar
  23. SAMREC, 2000, South African Code for Reporting of Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves (The SAMREC Code): Report prepared by the South African Mineral Resource Committee SAMREC under the auspices of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 38 p.Google Scholar
  24. Serrano, L., Vargas, R., Stambuk, V., Aguilar, C., Galeb, M., Holmgren, C., Contreras, A., Godoy, S., Vela, I., Skewes, M. A., and Stern, C. R., 1996, The late Miocene to early Pliocene Río Blanco-Los Bronces copper deposit, Central Chilean Andes, in Camus, F., Sillitoe, R. H., and Petersen, R., eds., Andean copper deposits: New discoveries, mineralizations, styles and metallogeny: Society of Economic Geologists, Special Publication no. 5, Littleton, Colorado, p. 119–130.Google Scholar
  25. Sinclair, A. J., and Blackwell, G. H., 2000, Resource/reserve classification and the qualified person: CIM Bull., v. 93, no. 1038, p. 29–35.Google Scholar
  26. SME, 1999, A guide for reporting exploration information, resources, and reserves: Report prepared by SME Resources and Reserves Committee, Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration, 17 p.Google Scholar
  27. Snowden, D. V., 2001, Practical interpretation of mineral resource and ore reserve classification guidelines, in Edwards, A. C., ed., Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation—The AusIMM Guide to Good Practice: The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Monograph 23, Melbourne, p. 643–652.Google Scholar
  28. USGS, 1980, Principles of a resource/reserve classification for minerals: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 831, 5 p.Google Scholar
  29. Vallée, M., 1999, Resource/reserve inventories: What are the objectives?: CIM Bull., v. 92, no. 1031, p. 151–155.Google Scholar
  30. Vallée, M., 2000, Mineral resource + engineering, economic and legal feasibility = ore reserve: CIM Bull., v. 93, no. 1039, p. 53–61.Google Scholar
  31. Wober, H. H., and Morgan, P. J., 1993, Classification of ore reserves based on geostatistical and economic parameters: CIM Bull., v. 86, no. 966, p. 73–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Emery
    • 1
  • Julián M. Ortiz
    • 1
  • Juan J. Rodríguez
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mining EngineeringUniversity of ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.NCL Ingeniería y Construcción S.A.SantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations