Why consumers respond differently to absolute versus percentage descriptions of quantities
- 373 Downloads
Consumers often provide different evaluations of absolute and percentage descriptions of the same quantity. Prior research has attributed this to two factors: selection of distinct reference contexts and differential cognitive difficulty. However, in a preliminary study, we show that discrepancies in consumer evaluations of absolute and percentage quantities can arise even when these two factors are held constant. A series of studies provides evidence that (1) this effect is rooted in automatic, nonverbal associations between numerical stimuli and analogue magnitude coding and (2) the influence of analogue magnitude codes manifests across different kinds of quantities, different evaluations, and different processing modes.
KeywordsAnalogue magnitude codes Face values Percentages Pricing Price evaluations
The authors contributed equally to this research. They would like to thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for the many helpful comments that substantially improved the quality and contribution of the manuscript.
- Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44(1–2), 1–42.Google Scholar
- Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Keren, G. (2011). Perspectives on framing. New York, NY: Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Krishna, A. (2009). Behavioral pricing. In V. Rao (Ed.), Handbook of pricing research in marketing (pp. 76–90). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Monroe, K. (2003). Pricing: making profitable decisions (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Price, P., & Matthews, T. (2009). From group diffusion to ratio bias: effects of denominator and numerator salience on intuitive risk and likelihood judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(5), 436–446.Google Scholar
- Slovic, P. (1972). From Shakespeare to Simon: speculations – and some evidence – about man’s ability to process information. Oregon Research Institute Monograph, 12(2).Google Scholar
- Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2009a). Heuristics in numerical cognition: implications for pricing. In V. Rao (Ed.), Handbook of pricing research in marketing (pp. 132–149). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar