Marketing Letters

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 701–717 | Cite as

When hedonic products help regulate my mood

  • Inés López López
  • Salvador Ruiz de Maya


This paper analyzes how affect mechanisms work when consumers form their attitude toward and intention to purchase a hedonic product. The first of two studies shows that when products have the potential to improve moods, affect regulation dominates affective evaluation in forming purchase intentions. In other words, the need to repair one’s mood overrides mood-congruent reviews. However, the affect regulation mechanism is not very stable, and study two shows that introducing a competing source of information, such as product reviews, overwhelms the effect. Results show that when consumers are in a bad mood, product reviews significantly influence their attitude and purchase intention regarding a hedonic product. However, this effect is not significant for consumers in a positive mood because they generate both arguments and counterarguments that compensate for the information received from a third party.


Mood Affect regulation Information processing Product reviews 



The authors thank the editor and the two reviewers for their helpful comments. This research was supported by the grant ECO2009-13170 from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and by the Fundación Séneca-Agencia de Ciencia y Tecnología de la Región de Murcia (Spain), under the II PCTRM 2007-2010. Authors also thank the support provided by Fundación Cajamurcia.


  1. Adaval, R. (2001). Sometimes it just feels right: the differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent product information. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrade, E. B. (2005). Behavioral consequences of affect: combining evaluative and regulatory mechanisms. Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atalay, A. S., & Meloy, M. G. (2011). Retail therapy: a strategic effort to improve mood. Psychology & Marketing, 28(6), 638–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (1998). Goal-directed emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bates, K., Burton, S., Howlett, E., & Huggins, K. (2009). The roles of gender and motivation as moderators of the effects of calorie and nutrient information provision on away-from-home foods. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 43(2), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batra, R., & Stayman, D. M. (1990). The role of mood in advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bush, A. J., & Hair, J. F. (1985). An assessment of the mall intercept as a data collection method. Journal of Market Research, 22, 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. L., & Vincent, J. (1973). Transgression and altruism: a case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 502–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. B., & Andrade, E. B. (2004). Affective intuition and task-contingent affect regulation. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Das, E., & Fennis, B. M. (2008). In the mood to face the facts: when a positive mood promotes systematic processing of self-threatening information. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drolet, A., Williams, P., & Lau-Gesk, L. (2007). Age-related differences in responses to affective vs. rational ads for hedonic vs. utilitarian products. Marketing Letters, 18, 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fedorikhin, A., & Cole, C. A. (2004). Mood effects on attitudes, perceived risk and choice: moderators and mediators. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 2–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forgas, J. P. (2007). When sad is better than happy: negative affect can improve the quality and effectiveness of persuasive messages and social influence strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The Broaden and Build Theory of Positive Emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garg, N., Wansink, B., & Inman, J. J. (2006). The influence of incidental affect on consumers’ food intake. Journal of Marketing, 71, 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gershoff, A. D., Mukherjee, A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2006). ‘I Love it’ or ‘I Hate it?’ The positivity effect of stated preferences for agent evaluation. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 454–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holbrook, M. B. (1986). Emotion in the consumption experience: towards a new model of the human consumer. In A. Peterson Robert, D. Hoyer Wayne, & R. Wilson William (Eds.), The role of affect in consumer behavior: emerging theories and applications (pp. 17–52). MA: Lexington.Google Scholar
  23. Isen, A. M., & Geva, N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: the person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knobloch, S., & Zillmann, D. (2002). Mood management via the digital jukebox. Journal of Communication (June): 351–366.Google Scholar
  25. Labroo, A. A., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2009). Lay theories of emotion transience and the search for happiness: a fresh perspective on affect regulation. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 242–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laros, F. J. M., & Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. (2005). Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research, 58, 1437–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larsen, R. J., & Prizmic, Z. (2004). Affect regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and applications (pp. 40–61). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  28. Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart strings and pursue strings: carryover effects of emotions on economic decisions. Psychological Science, 15, 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lim, E. A. I., & Ang, S. H. (2008). Hedonic vs. utilitarian consumption: a cross-cultural perspective based on cultural conditioning. Journal of Business Research, 61(2008), 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin, C. H., Yen, H. R., & Chuang, S. C. (2006). The effects of emotion and need for cognition on consumer choice involving risk. Marketing Letters, 17(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park, D. H., & Kim, S. (2008). The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pham, M. T., Cohen, J. B., Pracejus, J. W., & Hughes, D. (2001). Affect monitoring and the primacy of feelings in judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Raghunathan, R., & Trope, Y. (2002). Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 510–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: a pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: informational and motivational functions of affective states. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: foundations of social behavior (pp. 527–561). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  37. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences. In E. T. Higgings & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: handbook of basic principles (pp. 433–465). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  39. Sen, S., & Lerman, D. (2007). Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 76–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suh, J. C. (2009). The role of consideration sets in brand choice: the moderating role of product characteristics. Psychology & Marketing, 26(6), 534–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tice, D. M., Bratslavsky, E., & Baumeister, R. (2001). Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: if you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 53–67. January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40, 310–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The Hedonic Contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 5–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision. Journal of Marketing, 24, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang, Y., & Richard, B. (1999). Moderating effects of need for cognition on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  46. Zhao, W., Jr Lynch, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marketing Department, Social Sciences FacultyMiguel Hernández UniversityElche (Alicante)Spain
  2. 2.Marketing Department, School of Business and EconomicsRegional Campus of International Excellence “Campus Mare Nostrum”, University of MurciaMurciaSpain

Personalised recommendations