Marine Geophysical Researches

, Volume 26, Issue 2–4, pp 275–286 | Cite as

A Sound Approach to Soft Sediment Resolution

  • M. Snoek


The last few years has seen a surge in research activities directed towards investigating properties and dynamics of young marine, limnic and fluvial sediments. It is by now a well established fact that the sequence of sediments ranging from concentrated benthic suspension over fluid mud to un-consolidated material summarized as liquid sediments (LS), act as carriers for a wide range of pollutants discharged or migrated into waterways. Knowledge of the transport and fate of LS allows determining the transport and fate of adsorbed constituents (e.g., heavy metals, pesticides, PCBs, PAHs). To assess the environmental impact of LS, efforts have to be made to better understand the processes in relation to hydrodynamics and the chemical and physical properties of the layers. Since physical laws limit the resolution and detection power of conventional seismo-acoustic systems in respect of LS, alternative measurement, data analysis and processing approaches have to be found. Adapted acoustic procedures initially developed for shallow water marine environments to extreme shallow water regimes using matched field inversion techniques can reveal geoacoustic parameters including density, compressional wave speed and attenuation as a function of depth and time. The paper outlines the effects of sediment mobility upon the environment followed by a short overview of techniques commonly used to investigate sediments and other freshwater/marine events. The problems faced and limitations of existing systems are briefly outlined. Results obtained with recently developed and refined geoacoustic inversion methods are presented highlighting their potential for long-term study of physical properties and dynamics of LS.


acoustic surveys fluid mud mobile sediments shallow water 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biot, M.A. 1962Generalized theory of acoustic propagation in porous dissipative mediaJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.3412541264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chotiros, N.P. 1995Biot model of sound penetration in water saturated sandJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.97199214Google Scholar
  3. Dredging News Online 2002 Japanese Reservoirs Overflowing with Sediment. DNO 94.Google Scholar
  4. Doxaran, D.,  et al. 2002Spectral signature of highly turbid waters application with SPOT data to quantify suspended particulate matter concentrationsRemote Sens. Environ.81149161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eden, H., Mueller, V. and Vorrath, D., 2001, The DSLP – Echo Sounder, Detection of Sediment-Layers and Properties. Proc. Intern. Conf. on Port and Maritime R&D and Technology, Singapore.Google Scholar
  6. Eden, H., Mueller, V., Vorrath, D. 2000DSLP – an innovative echo sounding technologyHansa Intern. Maritime J.13718Google Scholar
  7. Folke, C., Holling, C.S., Perrrings, C. 1996Biological diversity, ecosystems, and the human scaleEcol. Appl.610181024Google Scholar
  8. Gaugush, R.F., 1998, An In-Situ Sediment Penetrometer for the Characterization of Sediment Type and Bottom Dynamic Condition. USGS Report PSR 98-08: 4 pp.Google Scholar
  9. GESAMP (IMO/FAO/UNESCO-IOC/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environmental Protection) 2001 Protecting the Oceans from Land-Based Activities. GESAMP Report 71: 55 pp.Google Scholar
  10. HAZMAT 1992 Report 93-1-Appendix B, US EPA, 98 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Hermand, J.P. 1999Broad-band geoacoustic inversion in shallow water from waveguide impulse response measurements on a single hydrophone: theory and experimental resultsIEEE J. Oceanic Eng.244166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hermand, J.P. and Holland, C.W., This Volume. Geoacoustic characterization of fine-grained sediments using single and multiple reflection data.Google Scholar
  13. Hermand, J.P., Gerstoft, P. 1996Inversion of broadband multitone acoustic from the Yellow Shark Summer ExperimentIEEE J. Oceanic Eng.21324346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hermand, J.P., Soukup, R.J. 1996 Broadband Inversion Experiment Yellow Shark ‘95: Modelling the Transfer Function of a Shallow-Water Environment with a Range-Dependent Soft Clay BottomPapadakis, J. S. eds. Proceedings of the third European Conference on Underwater AcousticsFORTH – IACMHeraklion324346Google Scholar
  15. Hermand, J.P. and Alberotanza, L., 2000, A Novel Acoustic Tomography Experiment in the Lagoon of Venezia La Ricerca Scientifica per Venezia, Progetto Scientifico Sistema Lagunare Veneziano, vol. 2.Google Scholar
  16. Holland, C.W. 2002Geoacoustic inversion for fine-grained sedimentsJ. Acoust. Soc. Am.11115601564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kern, U., Haag, I. and Westrich, B., 1999, Oekologische Bewertung der Sohlbettstabilitaet. Bericht des Instituts fuer Wasserbau, Universitaet Stuttgart, 6 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Lemly, A.D. 1996Wastewater discharges may be most hazardous to fish during winterEnviron. Pollut.93169174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mau, D.P., 2001, Sediment Deposition and Selected Water-Quality Characteristics in Cedar Lake and Lake Olathe, Northeast Kansas, 2000. USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4073.Google Scholar
  20. Mumby, P.,  et al. 2002Mapping marine environments with IKONOS imagery: enhanced spatial resolution can deliver greater thematic accuracyRemote Sens. Environ.82248257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Robertson, P.K., 1990, Sediment classification using the cone penetration test, Can. Geotech. J.Google Scholar
  22. Schoellhamer, D.H., et al., 1997, Sediment-Transport Research in San Francisco Bay. Proc. of the USGS Sediment Workshop, San Francisco 4 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Seefeldt, D., Eden, D., Mueller, V. and Vorrath, D., 1999, Measurements with the New Acoustic DSLP Method in Hamburg Port. 5th Workshop on Dredging and Surveying, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  24. Stevens, R., 2000, H-Sense Harbours – Silting and Environmental Sedimentology. Summary Report, EU 4th Framework Prog.Google Scholar
  25. Sturm, T.W., Amirtharajah A. and Tiller, C.L., 1998, Mobilization and Fate of Inorganic Contaminants Due to Resuspension of Cohesive Sediment. US EPA, NCER, abstract of final report, 5 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Toorman, E.A., 1997, Cohesive Sediment Transport: a State-of-the-ART. MAST III Report.Google Scholar
  27. Van der Herberg, W., 2001, Environmental Dredging Lake Ketelmeer. 7th Workshop on Dredging and Surveying, Scheveningen.Google Scholar
  28. Verbanck, M., Laaji, A., Niyonzima, A. 1999 Computing River Suspended Load over Bedforms in the LowerTransition and Upper HydraulicRegime625632Google Scholar
  29. Williams, C., 2003, Endstation Gehirn. Klett-Cotta: pp. 400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Hydroacoustics LaboratoryUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations