Numerical study on load-bearing capabilities of beam-like lattice structures with three different unit cells

  • Jie Niu
  • Hui Leng ChooEmail author
  • Wei Sun
  • Sui Him Mok


The design and analysis of lattice structures manufactured using additive manufacturing technique is a new approach to create lightweight high-strength components. However, it is difficult for engineers to choose the proper unit cell for a certain function structure and loading case. In this paper, three beam-like lattice structures with triangular prism, square prism and hexagonal prism were designed, manufactured by SLM process using AlSi10Mg and tested. The mechanical performances of lattice structures with equal relative density, equal base area and height, and equal length for all unit cells were conducted by finite element analysis (FEA). It was found that effective Young’s modulus is proportional to relative density, but with different affecting levels. When the lattice structures are designed with the same relative density or the same side lengths, the effective Young’s modulus of lattice structure with triangular prism exhibits the maximum value for both cases. When the lattice structures are designed with the same base areas for all unit cells, the effective Young’s modulus of lattice structures with square prism presents the maximum. FEA results also show that the maximum stress of lattice structures with triangular prisms in each comparison is at the lowest level and the stiffness-to-mass ratio remains at the maximum value, showing the overwhelming advantages in terms of mechanical strength. The excellent agreements between numerical results and experimental tests reveal the validity of FEA methods applied. The results in this work provide an explicit guideline to fabricate beam-like lattice structures with the best tensile and bending capabilities.


Lattice structure Unit cell Additive manufacturing (AM) Finite element analysis (FEA) Selective laser melting (SLM) 


  1. Ahmadi, S.M., Campoli, G., Amin Yavari, S., et al.: Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 34, 106–115 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alzahrani, M., Choi, S.-K., Rosen, D.W.: Design of truss-like cellular structures using relative density mapping method. Mater. Des. 85, 349–360 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashby, M.F., Medalist, R.M.: The mechanical properties of cellular solids. Metall. Trans. A 14(9), 1755–1769 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandl, E., Heckenberger, U., Holzinger, V., et al.: Additive manufactured AlSi10Mg samples using selective laser melting (SLM): microstructure, high cycle fatigue, and fracture behavior. Mater. Des. 34, 159–169 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brennan-Craddock, J., Brackett, D., Wildman, R., et al.: The design of impact absorbing structures for additive manufacture. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Brenne, F., Niendorf, T., Maier, H.J.: Additively manufactured cellular structures: impact of microstructure and local strains on the monotonic and cyclic behavior under uniaxial and bending load. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213(9), 1558–1564 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Choi, J., Chae, T.-S.: Effective stiffness and effective compressive yield strength for unit-cell model of complex truss. Int. J. Mech. Mater. Des. 11(1), 91–110 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deshpande, V.S., Fleck, N.A., Ashby, M.F.: Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 49(8), 1747–1769 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Eshraghi, S., Das, S.: Micromechanical finite-element modeling and experimental characterization of the compressive mechanical properties of polycaprolactone–hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds prepared by selective laser sintering for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 8(8), 3138–3143 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Evans, A.G., Hutchinson, J.W., Fleck, N.A., et al.: The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals. Prog. Mater Sci. 46(3), 309–327 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gervasi, V.R., Stahl, D.C.: Design and fabrication of components with optimized lattice microstructures. In: Proceedings of the Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, TX (2004)Google Scholar
  12. Giannitelli, S., Accoto, D., Trombetta, M., et al.: Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 10(2), 580–594 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson, L.J., Ashby, M.F.: Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, L.J., Ashby, M.: The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. The Royal Society (1982)Google Scholar
  15. Gorguluarslan, R.M., Gandhi, U.N., Mandapati, R., et al.: Design and fabrication of periodic lattice-based cellular structures. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 13(1), 50–62 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hao, L, Raymond, D.: Design and additive manufacturing of cellular lattice structures. In: The International Conference on Advanced Research in Virtual and Rapid Prototyping (VRAP). Taylor & Francis Group, Leiria (2011)Google Scholar
  17. Hunt, H.: The mechanical strength of ceramic honeycomb monoliths as determined by simple experiments: advanced materials. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 71(3), 257–266 (1993)Google Scholar
  18. Jin, T., Zhou, Z., Wang, Z., et al.: Experimental study on the effects of specimen in-plane size on the mechanical behavior of aluminum hexagonal honeycombs. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 635, 23–35 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ju, J., Summers, J.D.: Compliant hexagonal periodic lattice structures having both high shear strength and high shear strain. Mater. Des. 32(2), 512–524 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kempen, K., Thijs, L., Van Humbeeck, J., et al.: Mechanical properties of AlSi10Mg produced by selective laser melting. Phys. Procedia 39, 439–446 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, S., Barthelat, F., Moldovan, N., et al.: Deformation rate effects on failure modes of open-cell Al foams and textile cellular materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 43(1), 53–73 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, P.: Constitutive and failure behaviour in selective laser melted stainless steel for microlattice structures. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 622, 114–120 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, Z., Zhang, D.Z., Dong, P., et al.: A lightweight and support-free design method for selective laser melting. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 90(9–12), 2943–2953 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luxner, M.H., Stampfl, J., Pettermann, H.E.: Finite element modeling concepts and linear analyses of 3D regular open cell structures. J. Mater. Sci. 40(22), 5859–5866 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maskery, I., Aboulkhair, N.T., Corfield, M.R., et al.: Quantification and characterisation of porosity in selectively laser melted Al–Si10–Mg using X-ray computed tomography. Mater. Charact. 111, 193–204 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen, J., Park, S.-I., Rosen, D.: Heuristic optimization method for cellular structure design of light weight components. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 14(6), 1071–1078 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Niu, J., Choo, H.L., Sun, W.: Finite element analysis and experimental study of plastic lattice structures manufactured by selective laser sintering. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part L J. Mater. Des. Appl. 231(1–2), 171–178 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. Onck, P., Andrews, E., Gibson, L.: Size effects in ductile cellular solids. Part I: modeling. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 43(3), 681–699 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Park, S.-I., Rosen, D.W., Choi, S.-K., et al.: Effective mechanical properties of lattice material fabricated by material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit. Manuf. 1, 12–23 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parthasarathy, J., Starly, B., Raman, S.: A design for the additive manufacture of functionally graded porous structures with tailored mechanical properties for biomedical applications. J. Manuf. Process. 13(2), 160–170 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Read, N., Wang, W., Essa, K., et al.: Selective laser melting of AlSi10Mg alloy: process optimisation and mechanical properties development. Mater. Des. 65, 417–424 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reinhart, G., Teufelhart, S.: Load-adapted design of generative manufactured lattice structures. Phys. Procedia 12, 385–392 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosen, D.W.: Design for additive manufacturing: a method to explore unexplored regions of the design space. In: Eighteenth Annual Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium (2007)Google Scholar
  34. Seepersad, C.C., Kumar, R.S., Allen, J.K., et al.: Multifunctional design of prismatic cellular materials. J. Comput. Aided Mater. Des. 11(2), 163–181 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, M., Guan, Z., Cantwell, W.J.: Finite element modelling of the compressive response of lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 67, 28–41 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang, H., Chen, Y., Rosen, D.W.: A hybrid geometric modeling method for large scale conformal cellular structures. In: ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2005)Google Scholar
  37. Wang, D., Yang, Y., Liu, R., et al.: Study on the designing rules and processability of porous structure based on selective laser melting (SLM). J. Mater. Process. Technol. 213(10), 1734–1742 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams, C.B., Cochran, J.K., Rosen, D.W.: Additive manufacturing of metallic cellular materials via three-dimensional printing. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 53(1), 231–239 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan, C., Hao, L., Hussein, A., et al.: Evaluations of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 62, 32–38 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yan, C., Hao, L., Hussein, A., et al.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium alloy cellular lattice structures manufactured by direct metal laser sintering. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 628, 238–246 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang, L., Harrysson, O., Cormier, D., et al.: Additive manufacturing of metal cellular structures: design and fabrication. JOM 67(3), 608–615 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Youssef, S., Maire, E., Gaertner, R.: Finite element modelling of the actual structure of cellular materials determined by X-ray tomography. Acta Mater. 53(3), 719–730 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zok, F.W., Rathbun, H.J., Wei, Z., et al.: Design of metallic textile core sandwich panels. Int. J. Solids Struct. 40(21), 5707–5722 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing EngineeringThe University of Nottingham Ningbo ChinaNingboChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical, Materials and Manufacturing EngineeringThe University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  3. 3.SLM Solutions Singapore Pte LtdSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations