Corporate governance and performance of microfinance institutions: recent global evidences

Abstract

Using a global data set of 456 MFIs, this study investigates whether a MFI’s ownership structure and corporate governance influences its social performance. An attempt has been made to analyze the impact of ownership structure of MFIs on its social performance, taking five indicators into consideration. The study is based on secondary data which are obtained from rating reports from the five micro lender rating agencies: MicroRate, Microfinanza, Planet Rating, Crisil and M-Cril etc. The hypotheses are tested by performing an unpaired sample t test to investigate the statistical significant difference between the two types of ownerships on social performance. The result shows that socially oriented MFIs (NGOs and cooperatives) have shown their stronger focus on social goals by having a higher percentage of female borrowers and a lower average loan size than commercially oriented MFIs (banks and NBFIs), which indicates the importance of ownership type for social performance of MFIs. The findings of this study can lead to important contributions that provide better understanding of the role of ownership structure as well as corporate governance in the MFIs’ performance. MFIs have mostly been evaluated on their financial performance and there are very limited number of previous academic studies on ownership structure in the microfinance sector and its impact on MFIs mission of social impact. This study aims to cover this gap in the literature by making a cross-country study of examining the influence of ownership structure on the social performance of MFIs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Source: Compiled by authors

References

  1. Adhikary, S., & Papachristou, G. (2014). Is there a trade-off between financial performance and outreach in South Asian microfinance institutions? The Journal of Developing Areas, 48(4), 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Armendáriz de Aghion, B., & Morduch, J. (2000). Microfinance beyond group lending. The Economics of Transition,8(2), 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Armendariz, B., & Morduch, J. (2005). The economics of microfinance. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Armendáriz, B., & Szafarz, A. (2011). On mission drift in microfinance institutions. MPRA paper no. 31041.

  5. Awusabo-Asare, K., Annim, S. K., Abane, A. M., & Asare-Minta, D. (2009). Who is reaching whom? Depth of outreach of rural microfinance institutions in Ghana. International NGO Journal, 4(4), 132–141.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balkenhol, B. (2007). Microfinance and public policy: Outreach, performance and efficiency. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barth, J. B., Lin, C., & Wihlborg, C. (2012). Research handbook on international banking and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bédécarrats, F., Lapenu C., & Tchala, R. Z. (2010). Social audits in microfinance: What have we learned about social performance? SPI3 discussion paper 25. CERISE.

  9. Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. Chicago: Commons Clearing House.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2009). Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bogan, V. (2008). Microfinance institutions: Does capital structure matter? Department of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University, 454 Warren Hall, Ithaca, NY. Retrieved May 8, 2017 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1144762.

  12. Bubna, A., & Chowdhry, B. (2010). Franchising microfinance. Review of Finance,14(3), 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. CGAP. (2007). Beyond good intentions: Measuring the social performance of microfinance institutions. Retrieved May 8, 2017 https://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/CGAP-Focus-Note-Beyond-Good-Intentions-Measuring-the-Social-Performance-of-Microfinance-Institutions-May-2007.pdf.

  14. CGAP. (2013). Top 10 lessons on social performance management for microfinance. Retrieved on May 8, 2017 http://www.cgap.org/news/top-10-lessons-social-performance-management-microfinance.

  15. Chakrabarty, S., & Whitten, D. (2011). The sidelining of top IT executives in the governance of outsourcing: Antecedents, power D consequences. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management,58, 799–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Christen, R., Rosenberg, R., & Jayadava, V. (2004). Financial institutions with a double bottom line: Implications for the future of microfinance. Occasional paper no. 8, CGAP. Washington, DC.

  17. Contractor, F., Yong, Y., & Gaur, A. S. (2016). Firm-specific intangible assets and subsidiary profitability: The moderating role of distance, ownership strategy and subsidiary experience. Journal of World Business,51(6), 950–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cull, R., Demirg-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2009). Microfinance meets the market. The Journal of Economic Perspectives,23(1), 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cull, R., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Morduch, J. (2007). Financial performance and outreach: A global analysis of leading microbanks. The Economic Journal,117(517), F107–F133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Ellstrand, A. E., & Johnson, J. L. (1998). Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3), 269–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D’Espallier, B., Guerin, I., & Mersland, R. (2013). Focus on women in microfinance institutions. Journal of Development Studies,49(5), 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Desrochers, M., & Fischer, K. (2005). The power of networks: Integration and financial cooperative performance, CIRPÉE, Retrieved on May 8, 2017 http://www.cirpee.org/fileadmin/documents/Cahiers_2005/CIRPEE05-14.pdf.

  23. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics,26(2), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Farrington, T. (2000). Efficiency in microfinance institutes. Microbanking Bulletin, 20–23.

  25. Galema, R., Lensink, R., & Mersland, R. (2012). Do powerful CEOs determine microfinance performance? Journal of Management Studies,49(4), 718–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gallani, S., Krishnan, R., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Applications of fractional response model to the study of bounded dependent variables in accounting research. Working paper 16-016, Harvard Business School. Retrieved on May 8, 2017 http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Publication%20Files/16-016_76f5a04d-9d9d-4515-8c0c-8da99d5fb6f5.pdf.

  27. Gaur, S. S., Bathula, H., & Singh, D. (2015). Ownership concentration, board characteristics and firm performance: A contingency framework. Management Decision,53(5), 911–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gaur, A. S., & Delios, A. (2015). International diversification of emerging market firms: The role of ownership structure and group affiliation. Management International Review,55, 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gaur, A. S., & Gaur, S. S. (2009). Statistical methods for practice and research: A guide to data analysis using SPSS (2nd ed.). New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gaur, A. S., Kumar, V., & Singh, D. A. (2014). Resources, institutions and internationalization process of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business,4, 12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ginglinger, E., & Lher, J.-F. (2006). Ownership structure and open market stock repurchases in France. The European Journal of Finance,12(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gonzalez, A. (2008). How many MFIs and borrowers exist? http://www.themix.org/publications/how-many-mfis-and-borrowers-exist-updated-dec-2008.

  33. Gonzalez, A., & Researcher, L. (2010). Microfinance synergies and trade-offs: Social versus financial performance outcomes in 2008. Microfinance Information Exchange, Data Brief No. 7

  34. Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C., & Molinero, C. (2009). Social efficiency in microfinance institutions. Journal of the Operational Research Society,60(1), 104–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hansmann, H. (1996). The ownership of enterprise. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Haq, M., Skully, M., & Pathan, S. (2010). Efficiency of microfinance institutions: A data envelopment analysis. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets,17, 63–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hardy, D., Holden, P., & Prokopenko, V. (2003). Microfinance institutions and public policy. Policy Reform,6, 147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hartarska, V. (2005). Governance and performance of microfinance institutions in Central and Eastern Europe and the Newly Independent States. World Development,33(10), 1627–1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hartarska, V., & Mersland, R. (2012). Which governance mechanisms promote efficiency in reaching poor clients? Evidence from rated microfinance institutions. European Financial Management, 18(2), 218–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hartarska, V., & Nadolnyak, D. (2007). Do regulated microfinance institutions achieve better sustainability and outreach? Cross-country evidence. Applied Economics,39(10), 1207–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Helms, B. (2006). Access for all: Building inclusive financial systems. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hermes, N., & Lensink, R. (2007). The empirics of microfinance: What do we know? The Economic Journal,117, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hermes, N., Lensink, R., & Meesters, A. (2009). Financial development and the efficiency of microfinance institutions, centre for international banking, insurance and finance working. Paper, University of Groningen.

  44. Hermes, N., Lensink, R., & Meesters, A. (2011). Outreach and efficiency of microfinance institutions. World Development,39(6), 938–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ivatury, G., & Reille, X. (2004). Foreign investment in microfinance: Debt and equity from quasi-commercial investors (Focus Notes: 25). Washington, DC: Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP), The World Bank.

  46. Jansson, T., Rosales, R., & Westley, G. (2004). Principles and practices for regulating and supervising microfinance. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics,3(4), 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Judge, W. Q., Gaur, A. S., & Muller, M. K. (2010). Antecedents of shareholder activism: Evidence from a multi-country study. Corporate Governance: An International Review,18(4), 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kereta, B. (2007). Outreach and financial performance analysis of microfinance institutions in Ethiopia.

  50. Kyereboah-Coleman, A. (2007). The impact of capital structure on the performance of microfinance institutions. The Journal of Risk Finance, 8(1), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy,106, 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lafourcade, A., Isern, J., Mwangi, P., & Brown, M. (2005). Overview of the outreach and financial performance of microfinance institutions in Africa. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lapenu, C., Bruyne, B., & Verhagen, K. (2008). The role of investors in promoting social performance in microfinance. Retrieved on May 9, 2017 http://www.e-mfp.eu/sites/default/files/resources/European%20Dialogue%20No1.pdf.

  54. Lapenu, C., & Zeller, M. (2001). Distribution, growth, and performance of microfinance institutions in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. http://www.ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/16446/1/fc010114.pdf.

  55. Ledgerwood, J. (1999). Microfinance handbook: An institutional and financial perspective. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ledgerwood, J., & White, V. (2006). Transforming microfinance institutions: Providing full financial services to the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Lee, J.-H., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Managing multi-business firms: A comparison between Korean Chaebols and diversified US firms. Journal of World Business,48(4), 443–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Maes, J. P., & Reed, L. R. (2012). State of the microcredit summit campaign report 2012. Microcredit Summit Campaign, Retrieved on May 9, 2017 http://www.microcreditsummit.org/resource/46/state-of-the-microcredit-summit.html.

  59. Mersland, R. (2009a). The cost of ownership in microfinance organizations. World Development,37(2), 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Mersland, R. (2009b). The governance of non-profit microfinance institutions: Lessons from history. Journal of Management and Governance,22, 17–29.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mersland, R., Randøy, T., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2011). The impact of international influence on microbanks’ performance: A global survey. International Business Review,20(2), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. (2008). Performance and trade-offs in microfinance organizations—Does ownership matter? Journal of International Development,20(4), 598–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Mersland, R., & Strøm, R. Ø. (2009). Performance and governance in microfinance institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance,33, 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mersland, R., & Strøm, Ø. R. (2014). Microfinance institutions: Financial and social performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mersland, R., & Urgeghe, L. (2013). International debt financing and performance of microfinance institutions. Strategic Change,22, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Morck, R., Wolfenzon, D., & Yeung, B. (2005). Corporate governance, economic entrenchment and growth. Journal of Economic Literature,XLII, 655–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Mori, N., Golesorkhi, S., Randoy, T., & Hermes, N. (2015). Board composition and outreach performance of microfinance institutions: Evidence from East Africa. Strategic Change,24, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Mori, N., Randøy, T., & Gholersorkhi, S. (2013). Determinants of board structure in microfinance institutions: Evidence from East Africa. Journal of Emerging Market Finance,12(3), 323–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Ory, J.-N., Jaeger, M., & Gurtner, E. (2006). La banque à forme coopérative peut-elle soutenir durablement la compétition avec la banque SA? Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie,9(2), 121–157.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Oteng-Abayie, E., Amanor, K., & Frimpong, J. (2011). The measurement and determinants of economic efficiency of microfinance institutions in Ghana: A stochastic frontier approach. African Review of Economics and Finance, 2, 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Périlleux, A., & Szafarz, A. (2015). Women leaders and social performance: Evidence from financial cooperatives in senegal. World Development,74, 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Popli, M., Ladkani, R. M., & Gaur, A. S. (2017). Business group affiliation and post acquisition performance: An extended resource-based view. Journal of Business Research,81, 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Quayes, S. (2012). Depth of outreach and financial sustainability of microfinance institutions. Applied Economics, 44(26), 3421–3433. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.577016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Reed L. R. (2011). State of the microcredit summit Campaign report, Microcredit Summit Campaign. Retrieved on May 9, 2017 http://www.results.org/uploads/files/SOCR_2011.pdf.

  75. Robinson, M. S. (2001). The microfinance revolution: Sustainable finance for the poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Rosenberg, R., Gaul, S., Ford, W., & Tomilova, O. (2013). Microcredit interest rates and their determinants 2004–2011. Reports by CGAP and its partners. No. 7.

  77. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Tronhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students (4th ed., p. 32). London: Pearson Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Schmied, J. (2014). Financial performance and social goals of microfinance institutions. Potsdam University Press, Potsdam Economic Papers 2.

  79. Serrano-Cinca, C., & Gutiérrez-Nieto, B. (2014). Microfinance, the long tail and mission drift. International Business Review,23(1), 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Servin, R. J., Lensink, R., & van den Berg, M. (2012). Ownership and technical efficiency of microfinance institutions: Empirical evidence from Latin America. Journal of Banking and Finance,36(7), 2136–2144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Singh, D., & Delios, A. (2017). Corporate governance, board networks and growth strategies. Journal of World Business. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. (2009). Business group affiliation, firm governance and firm performance: Evidence from China and India. Corporate Governance: An International Review,17(4), 411–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Singh, D., & Gaur, A. S. (2013). Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management,19(3), 300–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Singh, D., Pattnaik, C., Gaur, A. S., & Ketencioglu, E. (2017). Corporate expansion during pro-market reforms in emerging markets: The contingent value of group affiliation and unrelated diversification. Journal of Business Research,82, 220–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Sinha, F., & Chaudhary, B. R. (2011). Governance: Integrating SPM into microfinance capacity building. Imp-Act Consortium and MicroSave.

  86. SPTF. (2012). Universal standards for social performance measurements. Industry guidelines—Effect size based on mean comparison. Retrieved on May 9, 2017 https://www.incofin.com/sites/default/files/attachments/newsitems/SPTF%20usspm_final.pdf.

  87. Stiglitz, J. (1990). Peer monitoring and credit markets. World Bank Economic Review, 4(3), 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Tchakoute-Tchuigoua, H. (2010). Is there a difference in performance by the legal status of microfinance institutions? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,50(4), 436–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. THE SEEP NETWORK. (2005). Measuring performance of microfinance institutions: A framework for reporting, analysis and monitoring, 105.

  90. Valnek, T. (1999). The comparative performance of mutual building societies and stock retail banks. Journal of Banking and Finance,23(6), 925–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Varottil, U. (2014). Microfinance and the corporate governance conundrum. Berkley Business Law Journal,9(1), 52.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Vichore, S., & Dashpande, S. (2012). Microfinance in India - a comprehensive analysis of the growth and performance of MFI’s. The International Journal’s Research Journal of Social Science and Management, 2(1), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Zeller, M., Lapenu, C., & Greeley, M. (2003). Social performance indicators initiative (SPI) final report. Retrieved on May 9, 2017 http://www.microfinancegateway.org/sites/default/files/mfg-en-paper-social-performance-indicators-initiative-spi-summary-report-phase-1-oct-2003.pdf.

  94. Zerai, B., & Rani, L. (2011). Is there a trade-off between outreach and sustainability of microfinance institutions? Evidence from Indian microfinance institutions. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2(11), 2222–2847.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Namrata Gupta.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 234 and 5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, N., Mirchandani, A. Corporate governance and performance of microfinance institutions: recent global evidences. J Manag Gov 24, 307–326 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9446-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Corporate governance
  • Ownership structure
  • Microfinance institutions
  • Social performance
  • NGOs
  • NBFIs