Advertisement

Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 503–523 | Cite as

Corporate social responsibility reporting and firm performance: evidence from China

  • Suwina Cheng
  • Kenny Z. Lin
  • William Wong
Article

Abstract

A series of product safety and child labor scandals in the mid-2000s aroused global concerns over business ethics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in China. The general public expects companies to be socially responsible and to look beyond the maximizing of profits. In this study, we examine the relationship between the issuance of CSR reports and performance, in terms of accounting income, market return, and growth by firms listed in China in 2008–2009. We find that the historical performance of firms has significant and positive effects on the issuance of standalone CSR reports. There is also a positive correlation between current CSR disclosures and subsequent performance. Finally, we find that corporate donations are positively associated with improved performance in the following year. Our results support the view that CSR is a useful business strategy even in a developing country such as China. We call for government authorities in emerging markets to advocate CSR practices and for the market participants to change their perception of and attitude towards CSR.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Accounting and market-based firm performance Sustainability China 

References

  1. Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, C. A. (2004). The ethical, social and environmental reporting-performance portrayal gap. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 17(5), 731–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams, C. A. (2008). A commentary on: Corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(3), 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of slack resources. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 97–105.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, H., & Wang, X. (2011). corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in china: an empirical research from Chinese firms. Corporate Governance, 11(4), 361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. China Sustainability Reporting Resource Center. (2010). A journey to discover values 2009: A study of CSR Reporting in China. http://www.societies.cam.ac.uk/greenbr/docs/2011-10-08-document.pdf
  8. Cheung, Y., Jiang, K., & Tan, W. (2012). ‘Doing-good’ and ‘Doing-well’ in Chinese publicly listed firms. China Economic Review, 23(4), 776–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho, S. Y., Lee, C., & Pfeiffer, R. J. (2013). Corporate social responsibility performance information and information asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Commission of the European Communities. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  11. Cosans, C. (2009). Does Milton Friedman support a vigorous business ethics? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(3), 391–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craib Design and Communications and Price Waterhouse Cooper LLP. (2010). CSR Trends 2010 Stacking up the Result.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Development Centre for Chinese CSR of China WTO Tribune. (2009). Reporting Research (2001–2009), The 2nd International Conference on CSR Reporting in China. http://www.csr-china.net/en/second.aspx?nodeid=d5dad5b2-2453-4015-9bb2-d650db593831&page=contentpage&contentid=6514d4a1-1f4b-4df7-9047-ed408333254c
  15. Dingwerth, K., & Eichinger, M. (2010). Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the global reporting initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.Google Scholar
  17. Economics Division of China Academy of Social Sciences. (2009). Blue book of corporate social responsibility: research report on corporate social responsibility of china (Blue Book 2009). China: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with Forks: The Triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island: New Society.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  20. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profit. The New York Times Magazine, Sept 13, 1970.Google Scholar
  21. Grant, C. (1991). Friedman fallacies. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(12), 907–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation. Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 19(6), 793–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Global Reporting Initiatives. (2006). Sustainability Reporting Guideline Version 3.0. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf
  24. Heal, G. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 30(3), 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heckman, J. (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.Google Scholar
  26. Jia, M., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Agency costs and corporate philanthropic disaster responses: The moderating role of women on two-tier boards—Evidence from People’s Republic of China. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(9), 2011–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, T. M., & Wicks, A. C. (1999). Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 206–221.Google Scholar
  28. Judge, G. G., Hill, R. C., Griffiths, W. E., Lutkepohl, W. E., & Lee, T. C. (1988). Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Julian, S. D., & Ofori-Dankwa, J. C. (2013). Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub-Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1314–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kang, K. H., Lee, S., & Huh, C. (2010). Impacts of positive and negative corporate social responsibility activities on firm performance in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kong, N., Salzmann, O., Steger, U., & Ionescu-Somers, A. (2002). Moving business/industry towards sustainable consumption: The role of NGOs. European Management Journal, 20(2), 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latemann, C., Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Li, S., & Schneider, A. (2009). CSR communication intensity in Chinese and Indian multinational firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(4), 426–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lin, C., Yang, H., & Liou, C. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 31, 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance. (2010). CSR in Asia: The real picture LRQA. Vietnam: LRQA.Google Scholar
  35. Lungu, C. I., Caraiani, C., & Dascalu, C. (2011). Research on corporate social responsibility reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility, XIII, 29, 117–131.Google Scholar
  36. Lynch, N. C., Lynch, M. F., & Casten, D. B. (2014). The expanding use of sustainability reporting. The CPA Journal, 84(3), 18–24.Google Scholar
  37. McAleer, S. (2003). Friedman’s stockholder theory of corporate moral responsibility. Teaching Business Ethics, 7, 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 854–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academic Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  40. Menichini, T., & Rosati, F. (2014). A fuzzy approach to improve CSR reporting: An application to the global reporting initiative indicators. Procedia-Social and behavioral Sciences, 109, 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Organisation For Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2004). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. France: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  42. Patten, D. M., & Zhao, N. (2014). Standalone CSR reporting by U.S. retail firms. Accounting Forum, 38, 132–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  44. Pietersz, G. (2011). Corporate social responsibility is more than just donating money. KPMG Advisory Services B.V., KPMG Caribbean Network.Google Scholar
  45. Pyo, G., & Lee, H. (2013). The association between corporate social responsibility activities and earnings quality: Evidence from donations and voluntary issuance of CSR reports. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 29(3), 945–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Qu, R. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Impact of regulations, market orientation and ownership structure. Chinese Management Studies, 1(3), 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Roman, R., Hayibor, C., & Agle, B. A. (1999). The relationship between social and financial performance. Business and Society, 38, 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scholtens, B. (2008). A note on the interaction between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Ecological Economics, 68, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shafer, W. E., Fukukawa, K., & Lee, G. M. (2007). Values and the perceived importance of ethics and social responsibility: The U.S. versus China. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(3), 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solomon, A., & Lewis, L. A. (2002). Incentives and disincentives for corporate environmental disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(3), 154–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stainer, L. (2006). Performance management and corporate social responsibility: The strategic connection. Strategic Change, 15(5), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Surroca, J., Tribo, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tang, L., & Li, H. (2009). Corporate social responsibility communication of chinese and global corporations in China. Public Relations Review, 35, 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. United Nations. (1987). Report of the World Commission on environment and development: Our common future. http://conspect.nl/pdf/Our_Common_Future-Brundtland_Report_1987.pdf
  57. Van Der Laan, G., Van Ees, H., & Van Witteloostuijin, A. (2008). Corporate social and financial performance: An extended stakeholder theory and empirical test with accounting measures. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(2), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vives, A. (2006). Social and environmental responsibility in small and medium enterprises in Latin America. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 21, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wu, M., & Shen, C. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 3529–3547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AccountancyLingnan UniversityTuen MunHong Kong

Personalised recommendations