Advertisement

Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 449–469 | Cite as

Preparing for business model change: the “pre-stage” finding

  • Sérgio André Cavalcante
Article

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate managers’ initiatives in the context of an emergent technology and their effect on the business models of firms. Building on four case studies of organizations interested in using an emergent technology for commercial purposes, this study applies a process-based framework of business model change. The main finding is that managers’ initiatives occur in the context of a “pre-stage” of potential business model change, which includes processes of experimenting and learning. The pre-stage finding gives a better understanding of when change initiatives affect a business model and when they do not, allowing managers to adopt a more proactive behaviour and guide their organizations towards effective business model change. The main contribution of this paper is to suggest the inclusion of the pre-stage idea in research and practice, since it is an intermediary step in the process of business model change that has been overlooked.

Keywords

Business model Change Innovation Processes New technologies Dynamic capabilities 

References

  1. Ambrosini, V., & Bowman, C. (2009). What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management? International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cavalcante, S. A., Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2011). Business model dynamics and innovation: (Re)establishing the missing linkages. Management Decision, 3(8), 1327–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, J., & Ching, R. K. H. (2002). A proposed framework for transitioning to an e-business model. Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 3(4), 375–390.Google Scholar
  4. Chesbrough, H. (2010). Business model innovation: Opportunities and barriers. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 354–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  6. Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2010). Business model evolution: In search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ESA—European Space Agency. (2005). Galileo—the European Programme for Global Navigation Services. ESA. http://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/Galileo/GalileoE3web_copy.pdf. Accessed September 27, 2010.
  9. Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6), 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gambardella, A., & McGahan, A. M. (2010). Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 262–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gavetti, G., & Levinthal, D. (2001). Bringing cognition back in and moving forward. Journal of Management and Governance, 5(3–4), 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Iansiti, M., & West, J. (1997). Technology integration: Turning great research into great products. Harvard Business Review, 75(3), 69–75.Google Scholar
  14. Johnson, M. W., Christensen, C. M., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59.Google Scholar
  15. MacInnes, I. (2005). Dynamic business model framework for emerging technologies. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 6(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mandell, M. P., & Steelman, T. A. (2003). Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations. Public Management Review, 5(2), 197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGrath, R. G. (2010). Business models: A discovery driven approach. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyer, C. B., & Stensaker, I. G. (2006). Developing capacity for change. Journal of Change Management, 6(2), 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Richardson, J., & Allen, J. (2006). Is the business model a useful strategic concept? Conceptual, theoretical, and empirical insights. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 17(1), 27–50.Google Scholar
  21. O’Connor, G. C. (2008). Major innovation as a dynamic capability: A systems approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Onetti, A., Zucchella, A., Jones, M. V., & McDougall-Covin, P. P. (2012). Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: Business models for new technology-based firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), 337–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., & Tucci, C. L. (2005). Clarifying business models: Origins, present, and future of the concept. Communications of AIS, 16, 1–25.Google Scholar
  24. Rappa, M. (2001). Managing the digital enterprise—business models on the web. http://ecommerce.ncsu.edu/business_models.html. Accessed March 12, 2012.
  25. Shafer, S. M., Smith, H. J., & Linder, J. C. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons, 48(3), 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Siegel, R. A., Hansen, S., & Pellas, L. H. (1995). Accelerating the commercialization of technology: Commercialization through co-operation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 95(1), 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodriguez, R., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010). Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 383–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Svejenova, S., Planellas, M., & Vives, L. (2010). An individual business model in the making: A chef’s quest for creative freedom. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 408–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tapscott, D., Lowi, A., & Ticoll, D. (1998). Blueprint to the digital economy: Creating wealth in the era of e-business. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  30. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Timmers, P. (2001). Building e-business models: Analytical framework. Electronic Markets, 8(2), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A., I. I. I. (2002). Winning through innovation: A practical guide to leading organizational change and renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  34. Weill, P., & Vitale, M. R. (2001). Place to space: Migrating to ebusiness models. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  35. Yakhlef, A. (2010). The corporeality of practice-based learning. Organization Studies, 31(4), 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aarhus University, Business and Social Sciences, Centre for Organizational Renewal and Evolution, (CORE)Aarhus VDenmark

Personalised recommendations