Journal of Management & Governance

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 683–706 | Cite as

The value of audit quality in public and private companies: evidence from Spain

  • Manuel Cano Rodríguez
  • Santiago Sánchez Alegría


This paper compares the value of audit quality, proxied by the selection of a big N auditor, to the external claimholders of private and public companies. Although the combination of a lower ownership concentration of public companies, the greater demand for financial information quality about these companies and their higher litigation risk can result in the expectation that audit quality should be more valuable for public than for private companies, the greater information asymmetry between the managers and the external stakeholders and the unavailability of alternative mechanisms for monitoring the managers can make external audit more valuable for the external claimholders of private companies. In this paper, we test these two competing views by analysing if banks and lenders take into account auditor selection in the formation of the cost of debt. Our results support the second view: we find that only private companies obtain a lower cost of debt when they are audited by a high-quality auditor. These results are robust to both endogeneity and unobserved firm-specific heterogeneity.


Audit quality Agency problems Big N auditors Private companies Cost of debt 



This research is funded by the P06-SEJ-01821 research project, of the General Secretary of Universities, Research and Technology of Andalucía and the SEJ2007-65782-C02-02ECON research project of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education.


  1. Anderson, R., Mansi, S., & Reeb, D. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnedo, L., Lizarraga, F., & Sánchez, S. (2007). Does public/private status affect the level of earnings management in code-law context outside the United States? A study based on the Spanish case. International Journal of Accounting, 42(3), 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashbaugh-Skaife, H., Collins, D. W., & LaFond, R. (2006). The effect of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(1–2), 203–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, R., & Shivakumar, L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 83–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu, S., Hwang, L., & Jan, C. (2001). Differences in conservatism between Big Eight and Non-Big Eight auditors. Working paper, Baruch College. City University of New York. New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
  7. Beatty, A., & Harris, D. (1998). The effects of taxes, agency costs and information asymmetry on earnings management: A comparison of public and private firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 3, 299–326.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blackwell, D. W., Nolan, T. R., & Winters, D. B. (1998). The value of auditor assurance: Evidence from loan pricing. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bond, S. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Working paper, Cemmap. London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  12. Burgstahler, D., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The importance of reporting incentives: Earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 983–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaney, P., Jeter, D., & Shivakumar, L. (2004). Self-selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms. The Accounting Review, 79(1), 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2007). The issue of endogeneity within theory-based, quantitative management accounting research. European Accounting Review, 16(1), 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choi, J., Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Simunic, D. (2008). Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Choi, J., & Wong, T. (2007). Auditors’ governance functions and legal environments: An international investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 13–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chow, C. W. (1982). The demand for external auditing: Size, debt and ownership influences. The Accounting Review, 57(2), 272–291.Google Scholar
  18. Chung, R., Firth, M., & Kim, J.-B. (2003). Auditor conservatism and reported earnings. Accounting and Business Research, 33(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chung, R., Firth, M., & Kim, J.-B. (2005). Earnings management, surplus free cash-flow, and external monitoring. Journal of Business Research, 58, 766–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Copley, P., Gaver, J., & Gaver, K. (1995). Simultaneous estimation of the supply and demand of differentiated audits: Evidence from the municipal audit market. Journal of Accounting Research, 33(1), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coppens, L., & Peek, E. (2005). An analysis of earnings management by European private firms. Journal of International Accounting. Auditing and Taxation, 14(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specialization. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Datar, S., Feltham, G., & Hughes, J. (1991). The role of audits and audit quality in valuing news issues. Journal Accounting and Economics, 14(1), 3–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fama, E., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fortin, S., & Pittman, J. (2007). The role of auditor choice in debt pricing in private firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), 859–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36, 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Francis, J., LaFond, R., Olsson, P., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Francis, J. R., Maydew, E. L., & Sparks, H. C. (1999). The role of the Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: a Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Francis, J., & Wang, D. (2008). The joint effect of investor protection and Big 4 audits on earnings quality around the world. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gómez-Aguilar, N., & Ruíz-Barbadillo, E. (2003). Do Spanish firms change auditor to avoid a qualified audit report? International Journal of Auditing, 7(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iríbar, A. (2002). El presidente del ICAC anuncia que recuperará la supervisión de calidad sobre las auditorías a empresas (“The president of the ICAC announces that he will recover the quality supervision over the companies audit”). El País, July 6th.Google Scholar
  33. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Management behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson, W., & Lys, T. (1990). The market for audit services: Evidence from voluntary auditor changes. Journal Accounting and Economics, 12(1–3), 281–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim, J., Chung, R., & Firth, M. (2003). Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 323–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim, J., Simunic, D., Stein, M., & Yi, C. (2005). Voluntary audit and the cost of debt for privately held firms: Korean evidence. Working paper, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
  37. Krishnan, G. (2003). Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1998). Law and finance. The Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palmrose, Z. (1997). Who got sued? Journal of Accountancy, 183, 67–69.Google Scholar
  40. Pierre, S., & Anderson, K. (1984). An analysis of the factors associated with lawsuits against public accountants. The Accounting Review, 59(2), 242–263.Google Scholar
  41. Pittman, J. A., & Fortin, S. (2004). Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rajan, R., & Zingales, L. (2003). Banks and markets: The changing character of European finance. Working paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  43. Seow, J.-L. (2001). The demand for the UK small company audit: An agency perspective. International Small Business Journal, 19(2), 61–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sercu, P., Vander Bauwhede, H., & Willekens, M. (2002). Earnings quality in privately held firms: The roles of external audits, stakeholders, and governance mechanisms. Working paper, Catholic University Leuven.Google Scholar
  45. Van Tendeloo, B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe: Evidence from the private client segment market. European Accounting Review, 17(3), 447–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vander Bauwhede, H., & Willekens, M. (2004). Evidence on (the lack of) audit-quality differentiation in the private client segment of the Belgian audit market. European Accounting Review, 13(3), 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wallace, W. A. (1987). The economic role of the audit in free and regulated markets: A review. Research in Accounting Regulation, 1, 7–34.Google Scholar
  48. Wallace, W. A. (2004). The economic role of the audit in free and regulated markets: A look back and a look forward. Research in Accounting Regulation, 17, 267–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Cano Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Santiago Sánchez Alegría
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Financial Economics and AccountingUniversity of JaénJaénSpain
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationPublic University of Navarra, Edificio Departamental de los MadroñosPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations