Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of the audit committee in Thailand: a mature monitoring mechanism or an evolving process?

  • Published:
Journal of Management & Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following the East Asia financial crisis of 1997 in common with other countries, Thailand mimicked a series of governance measures, including the mandatory formation of audit committees (AC), that were designed in western developed nations with diffuse share ownership, although evidence about the success of these measures in developed nations is mixed. This research contributes to understanding of the role of ACs in a non-English speaking developing country, where share ownership is concentrated, rather than diffuse. It examines the perceptions of audit committee members, investors and analysts about the roles ACs perform and the importance of these roles. To obtain a large number of responses we have used a questionnaire survey method. We adopt Spira’s (Corporate Governance: an International Review 6(1):29–38, 1998) model of evolutionary development of ACs in which they are characterised as developing along a continuum from an ‘infant’ to a ‘mature’ stage of development, although such development need not be linear. The majority of our participants report that ACs perform roles that are in line with international guidelines, but this appears to reflect a passive role in terms of complying with, rather than developing guidance and regulation. Our evidence reveals that the ACs placed greater emphasis on internal control systems, including internal audit and review of audit fees, than on roles associated with external audit and financial statements, indicative of an early stage in the process of evolutionary development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott, L. J., & Parker, S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACGA (The Asian Corporate Governance Association). (1999). Building stronger boards and companies in Asia. www.gcgf.org/library/speeches/ACGA.pdf.

  • ADBI. (1999). Corporate governance in Asia, Executive Summary Series No. S15/00. Japan: ADBI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alba, P., Claessens, S., & Djankov, S. (1998). ‘Thailand’s corporate financing and governance structures: Impact on firm’s competitiveness’. Paper Presented at Conference on Thailand’s Dynamic Economic Recovery and Competitiveness, Bangkok, 20–21 May 1998.

  • Al-Mudhaki, J., & Joshi, P. L. (2004). The role and functions of audit committees in the Indian corporate governance: Empirical findings. International Journal of Auditing, 8(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Twaijry, A., Brierley, J. A., & Gwilliam, D. R. (2002). An examination of the role of audit committees in the Saudi Arabian corporate sector. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 288–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APB (Auditing Practices Board). (1994). The audit agenda. London: APB.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCA (Business Council of Australia). (1991). Corporate practices and conduct. Melbourne: The Bosch Working Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkett, B. S. (1986). The recent history of corporate audit committees. The Accounting Historians Journal, 13(2), 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, M. E. (1990). The incentives for voluntary audit committee formation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 9(1), 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braiotta, L. Jr., Hickok, R. S., & Biegler, J. C. (1999). The audit committee handbook (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  • BRC (Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees). (1999). Report and recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committees. New York Stock Exchange.

  • Cadbury Committee. (1992). Financial aspects of corporate governance. London: Gee Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEPS (Centre for European Policy Studies). (1995). Corporate Governance in Europe CEPS. Working Party Report No.12 (Boach Report). Brussels: CEPS.

  • Chung, K. H., & Kim, Leong-Kuk. (1999). Corporate ownership and the value of a vote in and emerging market. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CICA (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants). (1988). The Macdonald report. Toronto: CICA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. (1999a, March). Expropriation of minority shareholders: Evidence from East Asia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3088. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. (1999b, February). Who controls East Asian Corporations? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2054. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • Collier, P. (1992). Audit committees in large UK companies. London, England: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P., & Zaman, M. (2005). Convergence in European corporate governance: The audit committee concept. Corporate Governance, 13(6), 753–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, A. C. (2002). Corporate governance mechanisms: A plea for less code and more market control. Corporate Governance, 10, 84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeZoort, F. T. (1997). An investigation of audit committees’ oversight responsibilities. Abacus, 33(2), 208–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeZoort, F. T. (1998). An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members’ oversight judgements. Accounting Organisations and Society, 23(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., Ezzamel, M., McLean, C., & Robson, K. (1999, October). New public sector reform and institutional change. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants.

  • Eichenseher, J. W., & Shields, D. (1985). Corporate Director liability and monitoring preferences. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 4, 13–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., & Jensen, M. C. (1983a). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E., & Jensen, M. C. (1983b). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, I., & Henry, W. (2005). The future of corporate governance: Insights from the UK. Edinburgh: ICAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, I., Henry, W., & Wallage, P. (2000). The future of corporate governance: Insights from the Netherlands. Edinburgh: ICAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAO (General Accounting Office). (1991). Audit committees: Legislation needed to strengthen bank oversight. Report to Congressional Committees.

  • Goodwin, J., & Seow, J. L. (2002). The influence of corporate governance mechanisms on the prevention and detection of control weaknesses, fraud and error: The perceptions of auditors and directors. Accounting & Finance, 42, 195–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICAEW (The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales). (1997). Audit committees: A framework for assessment. London: ICAEW Audit Faculty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iskander, M. R., & Chamlou, N. (2000). Corporate governance: A framework for implementation. Washington, D.C: The World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economies, 3, 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A., & Friedman, E. (1999). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. The MIT Entrepreneurship Center and the Russian – European Centre for Economic Policy (RECEP).

  • Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T. J. (1993). Audit committee effectiveness: An empirical investigation of the contribution of power. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12(1), 24–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T. J. (1998). Organizational and economic explanations of audit committee oversight. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(2), 129–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2000). Shaping the audit committee agenda. United States: KPMG Offices.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the World. Journal of Finance, 54, 471–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T., & Stone, M. (1997). Economic agency and audit committees: Responsibilities and membership composition. International Journal of Auditing, 1(2), 97–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., & Batten, J. (2001). The implementation of OECD corporate governance principles in post-crisis Asia. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 4, 47–62. www.greenleaf-publishing.com/pdfs/jcc4in.pdf.

  • Mallin, C. (2002). Institutional investors: The growth of global influences. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 10, 67–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. L., & Powell, T. E. (1989). The audit committee charater: RxFor fraud prevention. Journal of Accountancy. Accounting and Public Policy, 13, 121–139. February, pp.57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, K., & Williams, J. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13, 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 310–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • NACD (The NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Audit Committees). (2000). Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Audit Committees: A practical guide. Washington, D.C. National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) and The Center for Board Leadership.

  • Nikomborirak, D., & Tangkitvanich, S. (1999). Corporate governance: The challenge facing the Thai economy. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001). Corporate Governance in Asia: A Comparative Perspective

  • Pilbeam, K. (2001). The East Asian financial crisis: Getting to the heart of the issues. Managerial Finance, 27(1/2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, K., Rusbarsky, M., & Wong, J. (1989). Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among Nasdaq firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 8(2), 239–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, B., & Gendall, P. J. (1998). Audit committees in private and public sector companies in New Zealand: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Auditing, 2, 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PWC. (2001). Audit committees: Applying international best practices in Indonesia. Indonesia: PricewaterhouseCoopers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghunandan, K., Read, W. J., & Rama, D. V. (2001). Audit committee composition, “gray directors,” and interaction with internal auditing. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEC – Thailand (The Working Group on Enhancing Good Corporate Governance of Thai Listed Companies). (1999). Enhancing good corporate governance of Thai listed companies. The Office of Securities and Exchange Commission (Thailand): Bangkok. http://www.sec.or.th.

  • SET (The Stock Exchange of Thailand). (1997). Corporate governance in Thailand – A price waterhouse survey. Bangkok: The SET.

    Google Scholar 

  • SET (The Stock Exchange of Thailand). (1998). Regulation of the stock exchange of Thailand (Vol. 8). Bangkok: The SET.

    Google Scholar 

  • SET (The Stock Exchange of Thailand). (1999a). Notification of the stock exchange of Thailand Re: Qualification and scope of work of the audit committees (No.1).

  • SET (The Stock Exchange of Thailand). (1999b). Set drives good corporate governance launches institute of directors. SET. http://www.set.or.th.

  • SET (The Stock Exchange of Thailand) (1999c). Best practice guidelines for the audit committee (2nd published). SET

  • SET (The Stock Exchange of Thailand). (2001a). A survey on audit committees: Increasing expectations and expanding responsibilities. Bangkok: The SET.

    Google Scholar 

  • SET (The Stock Exchange of Thailand). (2001b). Committee on corporate governance development report on corporate governance. Bangkok: The SET.

    Google Scholar 

  • SET. (2003). Good governance assessment of listed companies. The Stock Exchange of Thailand. www.set.or.th.

  • S&P (Standard & Poor’s). (2001). S&P Supports push for higher awareness of corporate governance in Asia-Pacific. Standard & Poor’s News, 9 May 2001.

  • Sommer, A. A. (1991). Auditing audit committees: An educational opportunity for auditors. Accounting Horizons, 5, 91–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spira, L. F. (1998). An evolutionary perspective on audit committee effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spira, L. F. (1999). Ceremonies of governance: Perspectives on the role of the audit committee. Journal of Management and Governance, 3, 231–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suehiro, A. (2001). Family business gone wrong? Ownership patterns and corporate performance in Thailand. ADB Institute Working Paper No. 19.

  • Teoh, H. Y., & Lim, C. C. (1996). An empirical study of the effects of audit committees, disclosure of nonaudit fees, and other issues on audit independence: Malaysian evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 5(2), 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Treadway Commission (National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting). (1987). Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Washington D.C.

  • The World Bank. (1998). East Asia: The road to recovery. Washington, D.C: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tricker, R. I. (1978). The independent director: A study of the non-executive director and of the audit committee. Croydon, England: Tolley Publishing Company Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turley, S., & Zaman, M. (2004). The corporate governance effects of audit committees. Journal of Management and Governance, 8, 305–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanasco, R. R. (1994). The audit committee: An international perspective. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8), 18–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicknair, D., Hickman, K., & Carnes, K. C. (1993). A note on audit committee independence: Evidence from the NYSE on “grey” area directors. Accounting Horizons, 7, 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willekens, M., Vander Bauwhede, H., & Gaeremynck, A. (2004). Voluntary audit committee formation and practices among Belgian listed companies. International Journal of Auditing, 8, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiwattanakantang, Y. (1999a). An empirical study on the determinants of the capital structure of Thai firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal (Tokyo), 7, 371–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiwattanakantang, Y. (1999b, November). The effects of ownership structure and corporate governance on the performance of Thai firms. Department of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

  • Zhuang, J., Edwards, D., Webb, D., & Virginita Capulong, Ma. (2000). Corporate governance and finance in East Asia: A study of Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, and Thailand (Vol. 1). Asian Development Bank.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge with thanks the funding provided for this research by the Faculty of Business Administration, Kasetsart University, Thailand, and wish to express their thanks to the Stock Exchange of Thailand for its assistance. We are very grateful to all participants who responded to the questionnaires and extend our thanks to Prof. Marc Goergen, who advised on earlier drafts of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Accounting, Faculty of Business Administration, Kasetsart University, Kasetsart, Thailand

    Kwansagool Tengamnuay

  2. Manchester Businesss School, University of Manchester, Crawford House, Booth Street East, Manchester, M15 6PB, UK

    Pamela Stapleton

Authors
  1. Kwansagool Tengamnuay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pamela Stapleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela Stapleton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tengamnuay, K., Stapleton, P. The role of the audit committee in Thailand: a mature monitoring mechanism or an evolving process?. J Manag Gov 13, 131–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9067-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9067-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation