Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 222–227 | Cite as

Decreased Risk of Preeclampsia After the Introduction of Universal Voucher Scheme for Antenatal Care and Birth Services in the Republic of Korea

  • Seung-Ah Choe
  • Hye Sook Min
  • Sung-il Cho
Article

Abstract

Objectives A number of interventions to reduce disparities in maternal health have been introduced and implemented without concrete evidence to support them. In Korea, a universal voucher scheme for antenatal care and birth services was initiated in December 2008 to improve Korea’s fertility rate. This study explores the risk of preeclampsia after the introduction of a universal voucher scheme. Methods Population-based cohort data from the National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) covering 2002–2013 were analysed. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was used to estimate the relationship between the risk of preeclampsia and voucher scheme introduction. Results The annual age-adjusted incidence of preeclampsia showed no significant unidirectional change during the study period. In the GLMM analysis, the introduction of a voucher scheme was associated with a reduced risk of preeclampsia, controlling for potential confounding factors. The interaction between household income level and voucher scheme was not significant. Conclusions for Practice This finding suggests that the introduction of a voucher scheme for mothers is related to a reduced risk of preeclampsia even under universal health coverage.

Keywords

Voucher Preeclampsia National Health Insurance Service–National Sample Cohort Korea 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aabidha, P. M., Cherian, A. G., Paul, E., & Helan, J. (2015). Maternal and fetal outcome in pre-eclampsia in a secondary care hospital in South India. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(2), 257–260. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.154669.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Agha, S. (2011). Changes in the proportion of facility-based deliveries and related maternal health services among the poor in rural Jhang, Pakistan: Results from a demand-side financing intervention. International Journal for Equity in Health, 10, 57.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, S., & Khan, M. M. (2011). Is demand-side financing equity enhancing? Lessons from a maternal health voucher scheme in Bangladesh. Social Science & Medicine, 72(10), 1704–1710. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.03.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amendah, D. D., Mutua, M. K., Kyobutungi, C., Buliva, E., & Bellows, B. (2013). Reproductive health voucher program and facility based delivery in informal settlements in Nairobi: A longitudinal analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e80582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080582.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Ben-David, A., Glasser, S., Schiff, E., Zahav, A. S., Boyko, V., & Lerner-Geva, L. (2016). Pregnancy and birth outcomes among primiparae at very advanced maternal age: At what price? Maternal and Child Health Journal, 20(4), 833–842. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1914-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilano, V. L., Ota, E., Ganchimeg, T., Mori, R., & Souza, J. P. (2014). Risk factors of pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and its adverse outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: A WHO secondary analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(3), e91198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091198.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Braveman, P., & Gruskin, S. (2003). Poverty, equity, human rights and health. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81(7), 539–545.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Cave, M. (2001). Voucher programmes and their role in distributing public services. OECD Journal of Budgeting, 1(1), 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cetorelli, V. (2013). The impact of the Iraq War on neonatal polio immunisation coverage: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ensor, T. (2004). Consumer-led demand side financing in health and education and its relevance for low and middle income countries. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 19(3), 267–285. doi: 10.1002/hpm.762.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Haelterman, E., Qvist, R., Barlow, P., & Alexander, S. (2003). Social deprivation and poor access to care as risk factors for severe pre-eclampsia. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 111(1), 25–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hutcheon, J. A., Lisonkova, S., & Joseph, K. S. (2011). Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 25(4), 391–403. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ir, P., Horemans, D., Souk, N., & Van, D. (2010). Using targeted vouchers and health equity funds to improve access to skilled birth attendants for poor women: A case study in three rural health districts in Cambodia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 10(1), 1–11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Korea Ministry of Government Legislation. (2012). Revised Bills of the Maternal and child health act. Ministry of Government Legislation: Seoul.Google Scholar
  15. Korean Statistical Information Service. (2013). Birth statistics. Korean Statistical Information Service: Seoul.Google Scholar
  16. Kuklina, E. V., Whiteman, M. K., Hillis, S. D., Jamieson, D. J., Meikle, S. F., Posner, S. F., et al. (2008). An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: Implications for estimating maternal morbidity. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12(4), 469–477. doi: 10.1007/s10995-007-0256-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee, C. J., Hsieh, T. T., Chiu, T. H., Chen, K. C., Lo, L. M., & Hung, T. H. (2000). Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in an Asian population. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 70(3), 327–333.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, J., Lee, J. S., Park, S. H., Shin, S. A., & Kim, K. (2016). Cohort profile: The national health insurance service–national sample cohort (NHIS-NSC), South Korea. International Journal of Epidemiology. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv319.
  19. Luo, Z. C., An, N., Xu, H. R., Larante, A., Audibert, F., & Fraser, W. D. (2007). The effects and mechanisms of primiparity on the risk of pre-eclampsia: a systematic review. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21(Suppl 1), 36–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00836.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Malqvist, M., Yuan, B., Trygg, N., Selling, K., & Thomsen, S. (2013). Targeted interventions for improved equity in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066453.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramesh, K., Gandhi., S., & Rao, V. (2014). Socio-demographic and other risk factors of pre eclampsia at a tertiary care hospital, Karnataka: Case control study. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 8(9), Jc01–Jc04. doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2014/10255.4802.Google Scholar
  22. Salam, R. A., Lassi, Z. S., Das, J. K., & Bhutta, Z. A. (2014). Evidence from district level inputs to improve quality of care for maternal and newborn health: Interventions and findings. Reproductive Health, 11(Suppl 2), S3. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-11-S2-S3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Statistics Korea. (2013). Final results of birth statistics in 2012. Deajeon: Statistics Korea.Google Scholar
  24. Trogstad, L., Magnus, P., & Stoltenberg, C. (2011). Pre-eclampsia: Risk factors and causal models. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 25(3), 329–342. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.01.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van de Poel, E., Flores, G., Ir, P., O’Donnell, O., & Van Doorslaer, E. (2014). Can vouchers deliver? An evaluation of subsidies for maternal health care in Cambodia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(5), 331–339. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.129122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Victora, C. G., Vaughan, J. P., Barros, F. C., Silva, A. C., & Tomasi, E. (2000). Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies. Lancet, 356(9235), 1093–1098. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02741-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, Y. A., Chughtai, A. A., Farquhar, C. M., Pollock, W., Lui, K., & Sullivan, E. A. (2016). Increased incidence of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia after assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertility and Sterility. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.024.Google Scholar
  28. Yang, S., Platt, R. W., Dahhou, M., & Kramer, M. S. (2014). Do population-based interventions widen or narrow socioeconomic inequalities? The case of breastfeeding promotion. International Journal of Epidemiology, 43(4), 1284–1292. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu051.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of Public HealthSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical CenterCHA UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology, Institute for Health and Environment, Graduate School of Public HealthSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations