Objectives Investigate the feasibility of using a brief, 4-item PTSD screening tool (PTSD-PC) as part of routine prenatal care in two community health care settings serving ethnically and linguistically diverse low-income populations. Report prevalence and differences by sub-threshold and clinical levels, in demographic, health, mental health, risk behaviors, and service use. Methods Women were screened as part of their prenatal intake visit over a 2-year period. Those screening positive at clinical or sub-threshold levels were recruited if they spoke English, Spanish, Portuguese, Vietnamese or Arabic. Enrolled women were interviewed about psychosocial risk factors, prior traumas, PTSD symptoms, depression, anxiety, substance use, health and services, using validated survey instruments. Results Of 1362 women seen for prenatal intakes, 1259 (92 %) were screened, 208 (17 %) screened positive for PTSD at clinical (11 %) or sub-threshold levels (6 %), and 149 (72 % of all eligible women) enrolled in the study. Those screening positive were significantly younger, had more prior pregnancies, were less likely to be Asian or black, and were more likely to be non-English speakers. Enrolled women at clinical as compared to sub-threshold levels showed few differences in psychosocial risk, but had significantly more types of trauma, more trauma before age 18, more interpersonal trauma, and had greater depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms. Only about 25 % had received mental health treatment. Conclusions The PTSD-PC was a feasible screening tool for use in prenatal care. While those screening in at clinical levels were more symptomatic, those at subthreshold levels still showed substantial symptomology and psychosocial risk.
Post-traumatic stress disorder Pregnancy Screening Prenatal care
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
This study was supported by Grant R40MC23633 from the Maternal and Child Health Research Program, Maternal and Child Health Bureau (Title V, Social Security Act), Health Resources and Services Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. The funding source had no role in design, data collection, analysis, interpretation or writing of this manuscript. We would like to thank the prenatal care staff at both of the participating community health centers, and the women who participated in this study. A special thanks to Jennifer Moffitt, MSN, CNM, Perinatal Services Manager and Mary Fierro, Ph.D., Director of Social and Behavioral Health Services, for their leadership and assistance with the project, and to Elizabeth Delarosa Lawson, BA, Research Coordinator for her persistence and sensitivity in collecting the data.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Bennett, I., Coco, A., Coyne, J., Mitchell, A., Nicholson, J., Johnson, E., et al. (2008). Efficiency of a two-item pre-screen to reduce the burden of depression screening in pregnancy and postpartum: An IMPLICIT network study. The Journal of The American Board of Family Medicine,21(4), 317–325. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2008.04.080048.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Coleman, V., Carter, M., Morgan, M., & Schulkin, J. (2008). Obstetrician–gynecologists’ screening patterns for anxiety during pregnancy. Depression and Anxiety,25(2), 114–123. doi:10.1002/da.20278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Cox, J., Holden, J., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry,150(6), 782–786. doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Dancu, C. V., & Rothbaum, B. O. (1993). Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress,6, 459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, L., Corcoran, C., Turner, K., Yuan, N., & Green, B. (1998). Assessing traumatic event exposure: General issues and preliminary findings for the Stressful Life Events Screening Questionnaire. Journal of Traumatic Stress,11, 521–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Holtzheimer, P. E., Russo, J. E., Zatzick, D. F., Bundy, C., & Roy-Byrne, P. P. (2005). The impact of comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder on short-term clinical outcome in hospitalized patients with depression. American Journal of Psychiatry,162, 970–976.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., Harrison, P., Godecker, A., & Muzyka, C. (2013). Posttraumatic stress disorder among women receiving prenatal care at three federally qualified health care centers. Maternal and Child Health Journal,18(5), 1056–1065. doi:10.1007/s10995-013-1333-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, A., Ouimette, P., Kimerling, R., Camerond, R., Hugelshofer, D., Shaw-Hegwer, J., et al. (2003). The primary care PTSD screen (PC-PTSD): Development and operating characteristics. Primary Care Psychiatry,9(1), 9–14. doi:10.1185/135525703125002360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M., Rosenheck, R., Cavaleri, M., Howell, H., Poschman, K., & Yonkers, K. (2004). Screening for and detection of depression, panic disorder, and PTSD in public-sector obstetric clinics. Psychiatric Services,55(4), 407–414. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.55.4.407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Ware, J., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J., & Gandek, B. (2001). How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: A manual for users of the SF-8 health survey. Boston: QualityMetric.Google Scholar
Yudko, E., Lozhkina, O., & Fouts, A. (2007). A comprehensive review of the psychometric properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,32, 189–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar