Impact of Missing Data for Body Mass Index in an Epidemiologic Study
Objective To assess the potential impact of missing data on body mass index (BMI) on the association between prepregnancy obesity and specific birth defects. Methods Data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) were analyzed. We assessed the factors associated with missing BMI data among mothers of infants without birth defects. Four analytic methods were then used to assess the impact of missing BMI data on the association between maternal prepregnancy obesity and three birth defects; spina bifida, gastroschisis, and cleft lip with/without cleft palate. The analytic methods were: (1) complete case analysis; (2) assignment of missing values to either obese or normal BMI; (3) multiple imputation; and (4) probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Logistic regression was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI). Results Of NBDPS control mothers 4.6 % were missing BMI data, and most of the missing values were attributable to missing height (~90 %). Missing BMI data was associated with birth outside of the US (aOR 8.6; 95 % CI 5.5, 13.4), interview in Spanish (aOR 2.4; 95 % CI 1.8, 3.2), Hispanic ethnicity (aOR 2.0; 95 % CI 1.2, 3.4), and <12 years education (aOR 2.3; 95 % CI 1.7, 3.1). Overall the results of the multiple imputation and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were similar to the complete case analysis. Conclusions Although in some scenarios missing BMI data can bias the magnitude of association, it does not appear likely to have impacted conclusions from a traditional complete case analysis of these data.
KeywordsMissing BMI NBDPS BMI Missing data Birth defect
This work was supported through cooperative agreements under PA 96043, PA 02081 and FOA DD09-001 from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the Centers for Birth Defects Research and Prevention participating in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.
- 3.Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., Kuczmarski, R. J., et al. (1998). Overweight and obesity in the United States: Prevalence and trends, 1960–1994. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 22(1), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Little, R., & Rubin, D. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- 25.National Institutes of Health. (1998). Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults—The evidence report. National Institutes of Health. Obesity Research, 6(Suppl 2), 51S–209S.Google Scholar
- 26.World Health Organization. (2000). Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- 27.National Center for Health Statistics. (2012). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/about_nhanes.htm). Accessed 3 Sept 2014.
- 28.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). National health and nutrition examination survey: Analytic guidelines, 1999–2010. Vital and Health Statistics, 2(161), 1–24.Google Scholar