Effects of Group Prenatal Care on Food Insecurity during Late Pregnancy and Early Postpartum
- 587 Downloads
Objective This study compared the effects of group to individual prenatal care in late pregnancy and early postpartum on (1) women’s food security and (2) psychosocial outcomes among food-insecure women. Methods and Results We recruited 248 racially diverse, low-income, pregnant women receiving CenteringPregnancy™ group prenatal care (N = 124) or individual prenatal care (N = 124) to complete surveys in early pregnancy, late pregnancy, and early postpartum, with 84 % completing three surveys. Twenty-six percent of group and 31 % of individual care participants reported food insecurity in early pregnancy (p = 0.493). In multiple logistic regression models, women choosing group versus individual care were more likely to report food security in late pregnancy (0.85 vs. 0.66 average predicted probability, p < 0.001) and postpartum (0.89 vs. 0.78 average predicted probability, p = 0.049). Among initially food-insecure women, group participants were more likely to become food-secure in late pregnancy (0.67 vs. 0.35 individual care average predicted probability, p < 0.001) and postpartum (0.76 vs. 0.57 individual care average predicted probability, p = 0.052) in intention-to-treat models. Group participants were more likely to change perceptions on affording healthy foods and stretching food resources. Group compared to individual care participants with early pregnancy food insecurity demonstrated higher maternal-infant attachment scale scores (89.8 vs. 86.2 points for individual care, p = 0.032). Conclusions Group prenatal care provides health education and the opportunity for women to share experiences and knowledge, which may improve food security through increasing confidence and skills in managing household food resources. Health sector interventions can complement food assistance programs in addressing food insecurity during pregnancy.
KeywordsPregnancy Food insecurity Prenatal care CenteringPregnancy Group prenatal care
This project was supported the Research, Innovation, and Development Grants in Economics (RIDGE) Center for Targeted Studies, Southern Rural Development Center (SRDC), Mississippi State University, Dissertation Grant Program and by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Grant R36HS021975).This project also received support from the Institute for Advancement of Healthcare, Greenville Health System. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study was concurrently approved by the Institutional Review Boards at the Greenville Health System and the University of South Carolina. All study participants provided written informed consent prior to their enrollment in the study.
- 2.American Academy of Pediatrics, & American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2012). Guidelines for perinatal care (7th ed.). Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics.Google Scholar
- 9.Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health: Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (pp. 31–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- 10.Coleman-Jensen, A., Gregory, C., & Singh, A. (2014). Household food security in the United States in 2013: U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
- 13.Economic Research Service. (2012). Six-item short form food security survey module. Retrieved from http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/survey-tools.aspx.
- 16.Frith, A. L., Naved, R. T., Persson, L. A., Rasmussen, K. M., & Frongillo, E. A. (2012). Early participation in a prenatal food supplementation program ameliorates the negative association of food insecurity with quality of maternal-infant interaction. The Journal of nutrition, 142(6), 1095–1101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hamilton, J. G., & Lobel, M. (2008). Types, patterns, and predictors of coping with stress during pregnancy: Examination of the revised prenatal coping inventory in a diverse sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 29(2), 97–104. doi: 10.1080/01674820701690624.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Heberlein, E. C., Picklesimer, A. H., Billings, D. L., Covington-Kolb, S., Farber, N., & Frongillo, E. A. (2015). The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes. Archives of Women’s Mental Health, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s00737-015-0564-6.
- 21.Ickovics, J. R., Reed, E., Magriples, U., Westdahl, C., Schindler Rising, S., & Kershaw, T. S. (2011). Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: Results from a randomised controlled trial. Psychology & Health, 26(2), 235–250. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2011.531577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Lobel, M. (1996). The revised prenatal distress questionnaire (NUPDQ). Stony Brook, NY: Stony Brook University.Google Scholar
- 24.Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorial dependent variables using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
- 26.Picklesimer, A. H., Billings, D., Hale, N., Blackhurst, D., & Covington-Kolb, S. (2012). The effect of CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care on preterm birth in a low-income population. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206(5), 415.e411–415.e417. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078. doi: 10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1683.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.US Department of Agriculture. (2014). Food security in the US. From http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/food-nutrition-assistance/food-security-in-the-us/measurement.aspx#survey.
- 33.United States Public Health Service. (1989). Caring for our future: The content of prenatal care. A report of the public health service expert panel on the content of prenatal care. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Service.Google Scholar
- 34.Walker, J. L., Holben, D. H., Kropf, M. L., Holcomb, J. P, Jr, & Anderson, H. (2007). Household food insecurity is inversely associated with social capital and health in females from special supplemental nutrition program for women, infants, and children households in Appalachian Ohio. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107(11), 1989–1993.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar