Why Are Half of Women Interested in Participating in Group Prenatal Care?
To determine the likelihood of participating in group prenatal care (GPC) and associated factors among low-risk women receiving traditional prenatal care from obstetricians, family physicians or midwives, and to determine factors associated with likelihood of participating.
Prior to completing a self-administered questionnaire, a 2-min compiled video of GPC was shown to pregnant women receiving traditional prenatal care. Data were collected on opinions of current prenatal care, GPC, and demographics. Biologically plausible variables with a p value ≤0.20 were entered in the multivariable logistic regression model and those with a p value <0.05 were retained.
Of 477 respondents, 234 [49.2 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 44.6–53.6 %] reported being “definitely” or “probably likely” to participate in GPC. Women were more likely to participate in GPC if they had at least postsecondary education [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.84, 95 % CI 1.05–3.24], had not discussed labour with their care provider (aOR 1.67, 95 % CI 1.12–2.44), and valued woman-centeredness (“fairly important” aOR 2.81, 95 % CI 1.77–4.49; “very important” aOR 4.10, 95 % CI 2.45–6.88). Women placed high importance on learning components of GPC. The majority would prefer to be with similar women, especially in age. About two-thirds would prefer to have support persons attend GPC and over half would be comfortable with male partners.
Approximately half of women receiving traditional prenatal care were interested in participating in GPC. Our findings will hopefully assist providers interested in optimizing satisfaction with traditional prenatal care and GPC by identifying important elements of each, and thus help engage women to consider GPC.
KeywordsAntenatal care CenteringPregnancy Group prenatal care Traditional prenatal care Women’s preferences
We thank the women who shared their thoughts with us and the clinic staff for their support. The authors acknowledge salary support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) New Investigator Salary Award and the Ada Slaight and Slaight Family Foundation. Neither had any role in the conduct of the analyses, writing of the report, interpretation of data or decision to submit the manuscript. The authors report no conflict of interest.
- 5.Centering Healthcare Institute. (2014). The Centering Model. http://www.centeringhealthcare.org/pages/about/history.php. Accessed 31 Mar 2014.
- 17.Larroque, B., Ancel, P. Y., Marret, S., Marchand, L., Andre, M., Arnaud, C., et al. (2008). Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): A longitudinal cohort study. Lancet, 371(9615), 813–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes (2007). In R. E. Behrman & A. S. Butler (Eds.), Preterm birth: Causes, consequences and prevention. Washington DC: National Academies Press (US).Google Scholar
- 21.Shields, S. G., & Candib, L. M. (2010). Women-centered care in pregnancy and childbirth. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar
- 22.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2015). Strong start for mother and newborns initiative: General information. http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/strong-start/. Accessed 23 Mar 2015.
- 23.Statistics Canada. (2011). Census profile. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E. Accessed 5 July 2013.
- 24.Statistics Canada. (2014). Median total income, by family type, by census metropolitan area (All census families). July 23, 2014.Google Scholar
- 25.Statistics Canada. (2014). Family charateristics summary annual (number unless otherwise noted), cansim database. July 22, 2014.Google Scholar
- 26.Statistics Canada. (2014). National Household Survey (NHS) profile, Hamilton, C, Ontario, 2011. April 28, 2014.Google Scholar
- 27.Statistics Canada. (2014). National Household Survey (NHS) profile, Brantford, CY, Ontario, 2011. April 28, 2014.Google Scholar
- 28.Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J. K., Curtin, S. C., & Matthews, T. J. (2015). Division of vital statistics. Births: Final data for 2013. National Vital Statistics Reports, 64(1), 1–101.Google Scholar