Measurement of Perceived Stress Among Pregnant Women: A Comparison of Two Different Instruments
Assess the amount of agreement between the classification of stress from the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and the Assessment of Stress portion of the Prenatal Psychosocial Profile (PPP) among pregnant women. A secondary data analysis on a cross-sectional study of 301 pregnant women from the New Orleans and Baton Rouge areas who were exposed to Hurricane Katrina was conducted. Women with complete data (219) were analyzed. Women scoring in the third tertile of each instrument were compared. The kappa statistic was used to assess agreement between instruments. Additional comparisons were made with three instruments that measure other important psychosocial constructs that could be related to stress: the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) and the Assessments of Support (partner and other support) and Self-Esteem from the PPP. No significant difference was found between the two tests. The PSS and the PPP were both statistically significantly correlated to each other (ρ = 0.71, p < 0.01). Thirty-five women were classified discordantly resulting in a Kappa Coefficient of 0.61 (95 % CI 0.50–0.72, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found between these two instruments in correlation with the EDS (PPP, r = 0.76; PSS, r = 0.72; p < 0.01 for each), partner support (PPP, r = −0.47; PSS r = −0.46; p < 0.01 for each), other support (PPP, r = −0.31; PSS r = −0.32; p < 0.01 for each) and self-esteem (PPP, r = −0.41; PSS, r = −0.52; p < 0.01 for each), respectively. Given the similarities between the PSS and PPP, researchers are encouraged to choose and administer one instrument to participants, or to use the instruments in combination as an external reliability check.
KeywordsStress Measurement Women Instrument Pregnancy
Data collection was funded by NIH/NICHD 3U01HD040477-0552. Support for this analysis was provided by the NIH Grant 5T32HD057780-05.
- 3.Zhu, P., Huang, W., Hao, J. H., et al. (2013). Time-specific effect of prenatal stressful life events on gestational weight gain. International journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: The Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 122(3), 207–211. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Keim, S. A., Daniels, J. L., Dole, N., et al. (2011). A prospective study of maternal anxiety, perceived stress, and depressive symptoms in relation to infant cognitive development. Early Human Development, 87(5), 373–380. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.02.004.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Grote, N. K., Bridge, J. A., Gavin, A. R., et al. (2010). A meta-analysis of depression during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(10), 1012–1024. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.111.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Copper, R. L., Goldenberg, R. L., Das, A., et al. (1996). The preterm prediction study: Maternal stress is associated with spontaneous preterm birth at less than thirty-five weeks’ gestation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175(5), 1286–1292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Cohen, S., Kessler, R. C., & Gordon, L. U. (1995). Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- 21.Lavrakas P. J. (2008) Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Los Angeles, Calif.; London: Sage; 2008. http://libproxy.tulane.edu:2048/login?url=http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/survey/SAGE.xml.
- 28.Cohen, S. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 31–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar