Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 18, Issue 10, pp 2489–2498 | Cite as

Validation of Self-reported Maternal and Infant Health Indicators in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System

  • Patricia Dietz
  • Jennifer Bombard
  • Candace Mulready-Ward
  • John Gauthier
  • Judith Sackoff
  • Peggy Brozicevic
  • Melissa Gambatese
  • Michael Nyland-Funke
  • Lucinda England
  • Leslie Harrison
  • Allan Taylor
Article

Abstract

To assess the validity of self-reported maternal and infant health indicators reported by mothers an average of 4 months after delivery. Three validity measures—sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV)—were calculated for pregnancy history, pregnancy complications, health care utilization, and infant health indicators self-reported on the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) questionnaire by a representative sample of mothers delivering live births in New York City (NYC) (n = 603) and Vermont (n = 664) in 2009. Data abstracted from hospital records served as gold standards. All data were weighted to be representative of women delivering live births in NYC or Vermont during the study period. Most PRAMS indicators had >90 % specificity. Indicators with >90 % sensitivity and PPV for both sites included prior live birth, any diabetes, and Medicaid insurance at delivery, and for Vermont only, infant admission to the NICU and breastfeeding in the hospital. Indicators with poor sensitivity and PPV (<70 %) for both sites (i.e., NYC and Vermont) included placenta previa and/or placental abruption, urinary tract infection or kidney infection, and for NYC only, preterm labor, prior low-birth-weight birth, and prior preterm birth. For Vermont only, receipt of an HIV test during pregnancy had poor sensitivity and PPV. Mothers accurately reported information on prior live births and Medicaid insurance at delivery; however, mothers’ recall of certain pregnancy complications and pregnancy history was poor. These findings could be used to prioritize data collection of indicators with high validity.

Keywords

Validation Pregnancy Preterm HIV test 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Kim Burley for his computer programming assistance and Christopher Johnson and Brian Morrow for their statistical support. In addition, we thank New York City PRAMS project, Vermont PRAMS Project, and Sarah Rubinstein, MPH for training abstractors and validating abstracted data; Brennan Martin, MPH and Joan Mongeon, MS for coordinating data collection efforts; and Jahidah Reid, PA, Odessa Fynn, CM, MS, and Kathleen Keleher, RN, MPH, FACNM, for abstracting information from medical records.

References

  1. 1.
    Stuart, J. J., Merz, C. N. B., Berga, S. L., Miller, V. M., Ouyang, P., Shufelt, C. L., et al. (2013). Maternal recall of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A systematic review. Journal of Women’s Health, 22(00), 1–11.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tilley, B. C., Barnes, A. B., Bergstralh, E., Labarthe, D., Noller, K. L., Colton, T., et al. (1985). A comparison of pregnancy history recall and medical records. Implications for retrospective studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 121(2), 269–281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lederman, S. A., & Paxton, A. (1998). Maternal reporting of prepregnancy weight and birth outcome: Consistency and completeness compared with the clinical record. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2(2), 123–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hakim, R. B., Tielsch, J. M., & See, L. C. (1992). Agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age. American Journal of Epidemiology, 136(5), 566–573.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casey, R., Rieckhoff, M., Beebe, S. A., & Pinto-Martin, J. (1992). Obstetric and perinatal events: The accuracy of maternal report. Clinical Pediatrics (Phila), 31(4), 200–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Githens, P. B., Glass, C. A., Sloan, F. A., & Entman, S. S. (1993). Maternal recall and medical records: An examination of events during pregnancy, childbirth, and early infancy. Birth, 20(3), 136–141. PubMed PMID: 8240621 (Epub 1993/09/01. Eng).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Buka, S. L., Goldstein, J. M., Seidman, L. J., & Tsuang, M. T. (2000). Maternal recall of pregnancy history: Accuracy and bias in schizophrenia research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 26(2), 335–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buka, S. L., Goldstein, J. M., Spartos, E., & Tsuang, M. T. (2004). The retrospective measurement of prenatal and perinatal events: Accuracy of maternal recall. Schizophrenia Research, 71(2–3), 417–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jurek, A. M., Greenland, S., Spector, L. G., Roesler, M. A., Robison, L. L., & Ross, J. A. (2011). Self-report versus medical record—perinatal factors in a study of infant leukaemia: A study from the Children’s Oncology Group. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 25(6), 540–548.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tomeo, C. A., Rich-Edwards, J. W., Michels, K. B., Berkey, C. S., Hunter, D. J., Frazier, A. L., et al. (1999). Reproducibility and validity of maternal recall of pregnancy-related events. Epidemiology, 10(6), 774–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yawn, B. P., Suman, V. J., & Jacobsen, S. J. (1998). Maternal recall of distant pregnancy events. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51(5), 399–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seidman, D. S., Slater, P. E., Ever-Hadani, P., & Gale, R. (1987). Accuracy of mothers’ recall of birthweight and gestational age. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 94(8), 731–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Piper, J. M. M. E., Snowden, M., Hall, C., Adams, M., & Taylor, P. (1993). Validation of 1989 Tennessee birth certificates using maternal and newborn hospital records. American Journal of Epidemiology, 137(7), 758–768.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, R., Scanlon, K. S., & Serdula, M. K. (2005). The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice. Nutrition Reviews, 63(4), 103–110.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yudin, M. H., Barbara, A. M., Guenter, D., Shaul, R. Z., Remis, R. S., & King, S. M. (2006). Medical records and women’s self-report are not reliable sources for determining whether prenatal HIV testing was done. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (JOGC), 28(10), 867–872.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Campo, P., de Boer, M., Faden, R., Kass, N., Gielen, A., & Barbacci, M. (1997). Confirmation of self-report of HIV testing among a cohort of pregnant women. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50(1), 57–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Dietz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer Bombard
    • 1
  • Candace Mulready-Ward
    • 3
  • John Gauthier
    • 4
  • Judith Sackoff
    • 3
  • Peggy Brozicevic
    • 4
  • Melissa Gambatese
    • 4
  • Michael Nyland-Funke
    • 4
  • Lucinda England
    • 1
  • Leslie Harrison
    • 1
  • Allan Taylor
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Reproductive HealthCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Program Evaluation Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS PreventionCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Gotham CenterNew York City Department of Health and Mental HygieneQueensUSA
  4. 4.Vermont Department of HealthAgency of Human ServicesBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations