Traditional Versus Internet Bullying in Junior High School Students
- 1.8k Downloads
To examine the prevalence of traditional and Internet bullying and the personal, family, and school environment characteristics of perpetrators and victims. Students (12–14 years old) in 35 junior high schools were randomly selected from the Jerusalem Hebrew (secular and religious) and Arab educational system (n = 2,610). Students answered an anonymous questionnaire, addressing personal, family, and school characteristics. Traditional bullying and Internet bullying for perpetrators and victims were categorized as either occurring at least sometimes during the school year or not occurring. Twenty-eight percent and 8.9 % of students were perpetrators of traditional and Internet bullying, respectively. The respective proportions of victims were 44.9 and 14.4 %. Traditional bullies presented higher Odds Ratios (ORs) for boys, for students with poor social skills (those who had difficulty in making friends, were influenced by peers in their behavior, or were bored), and for those who had poor communication with their parents. Boys and girls were equally likely to be Internet bullies and to use the Internet for communication and making friends. The OR for Internet bullying victims to be Internet bullying perpetrators was 3.70 (95 % confidence interval 2.47–5.55). Victims of traditional bullying felt helpless, and victims of traditional and Internet bullying find school to be a frightening place. There was a higher OR of Internet victimization with reports of loneliness. Traditional bully perpetrators present distinctive characteristics, while Internet perpetrators do not. Victims of traditional and Internet bullying feel fear in school. Tailored interventions are needed to address both types of bullying.
KeywordsBullying Internet Junior high schools Adolescents Israel
This work was supported by a grant from the Sapir Fund, Israel. We thank Gleb Haynatzki, PhD, for his statistical advice.
- 1.Prevention of violence: a public health priority [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: Forty-ninth World Health Assembly; 20–25 May 1996 [cited February 2012]. Available from: http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/resources/publications/en/WHA4925_eng.pdf.
- 2.Krug, E., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (Eds.). (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- 3.Pinhero, P. S. (2006). Report of the independent expert from the United Nations study on violence against children [Internet]. New York: World Health Organization [cited February 2012]. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/violencestudy/reports/SG_violencestudy_en.pdf.
- 21.Internet World Stats. Accessed February 2012.Google Scholar
- 38.Perren, S., Dooley, J., Shaw, T., et al. (2010). Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health [cited February 2012];4(28). Available from: http://www.capmh.com/content/4/1/28.
- 39.Bayraktar, F. (2011). Bullying among adolescents in North Cyprus and Turkey: Testing a multifactor model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2011 Dec 26; doi: 10.1177/0886260511424502.
- 40.Harel, Y., Kanny, D., Rahav, G. (1997). Youth in Israel: Social wellbeing health and risk behaviors from an international perspective. Jerusalem: JDC-Brookdale Institute and Bar Ilan University Press (In Hebrew).Google Scholar
- 41.SPSS for Windows. Version 14.0.Google Scholar
- 49.Cuadrado-Gordillo, I. (2011). Repetition, power imbalance, and intentionality: Do these criteria conform to teenagers’ perception of bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2011 Dec 26; doi: 10.1177/0886260511431436.
- 51.Hunt, C., Peters, L., Rapee, R. M. (2012). Development of a measure of the experience of being bullied in youth. Psychology Assessment. 2012 Jan 16; doi: 10.1037/a0025178].