Predisposing, Enabling and Pregnancy-Related Determinants of Late Initiation of Prenatal Care
Prenatal care is important for the health and wellbeing of women and their babies. There is international consensus that prenatal care should begin in the first trimester. This study aims to analyze the effects of predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of late prenatal care initiation. In this prospective observational study, 333 women were recruited consecutively at the beginning of their prenatal care trajectory. Data was collected on the timing of the first prenatal visit and on socio-demographic and pregnancy-related characteristics, using a semi-structured interview. A multivariate binominal logistic regression was applied to analyze independent effects on late initiation of prenatal care. Bivariately late initiation of care was associated with being inactive on the labor market, non-European origin, not having lived in Belgium since birth, low income, receiving welfare benefits, not having a regular obstetrician and experiencing difficulties getting a first appointment. When adjusting for all determinants, our multivariate analyses showed that late initiation was associated with non-European origin, low income and not having a regular obstetrician. This study shows that late initiation of prenatal care is associated with predisposing and enabling determinants. In order to ensure timely initiation of care, policy-makers should focus on encouraging women to have a regular prenatal care provider before pregnancy and taking steps in lowering out-of-pocket fees for low-income women. Future research is needed to examine whether these determinants are associated with initiation of care only or whether they play a role in the pregnancy follow-up as well.
KeywordsPrenatal care (Mesh) Health behavior model Socioeconomic factors (Mesh) Pregnancy (Mesh) Initiation of care
This study was supported by a grant from the Brussels Metropolitan Region, for which we want to express our gratitude. We also want to thank the members of our advisory commission for their help and advice in our research project. The members of this commission are S. Alexander, C. Buekenhout, B. Buysse, G. Masuy-Stroobant, M. De Spiegelaere, V. De Vis, G. Vanbrempt and C. Van Vaerenbergh. Further, this study was made possible thanks to the clinical centres that provided the necessary support and the participation of the pregnant women themselves. We want to thank the Brussels-Capital Health and Social Observatory for making their data available for the comparison with our sample.
- 4.World Health Organization. (2006) Provision of effective antenatal care. http://who.int/reproductive-health/publications/maternal_newborn.en.html. [cited 2008 Nov 26]
- 5.National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2008) Antenatal care. Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. http://www.nice.org.uk/. March [cited 2008 Nov 26]
- 24.What are equivalence scales? Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2009 September 17. http://www.oecd.org. [cited 2009 Dec 9]
- 25.European Commission: Eurostat. (2009). National mean and median income by household type. European Commission: Eurostat 2009 December 16. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home. [cited 2009 Dec 7]
- 26.European Commission: Eurostat. (2009). Living conditions in 2008. 17% of EU27 population at risk of poverty. European Commission: Eurostat 2009 December 16. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu. [cited 2009 Dec 9]
- 29.StataCorp. (2005). Stata statiscial software: release 9. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
- 33.De Gauquier, K., & Remacle, A. (2007). Prenatale zorg in België in 2005. Studie van het Intermutualistisch Agentschap. Brussel: IMA.Google Scholar