Advertisement

Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 713–721 | Cite as

Associations between State Economic and Health Systems Capacities and Service Use by Children with Special Health Care Needs

  • Lewis H. Margolis
  • Michelle Mayer
  • Kathryn A. Clark
  • Anita M. Farel
Article
  • 201 Downloads

Abstract

To examine the relationship between measures of state economic, political, health services, and Title V capacity and individual level measures of the well-being of CSHCN. We selected five measures of Title V capacity from the Title V Information System and 13 state capacity measures from a variety of data sources, and eight indicators of intermediate health outcomes from the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs. To assess the associations between Title V capacity and health services outcomes, we used stepwise regression to identify significant capacity measures while accounting for the survey design and clustering of observations by state. To assess the associations between economic, political and health systems capacity and health outcomes we fit weighted logistic regression models for each outcome, using a stepwise procedure to reduce the models. Using statistically significant capacity measures from the stepwise models, we fit reduced random effects logistic regression models to account for clustering of observations by state. Few measures of Title V and state capacity were associated with health services outcomes. For health systems measures, a higher percentage of uninsured children was associated with decreased odds of receipt of early intervention services, decreased odds of receipt of professional care coordination, and increased odds of delayed or missed care. Parents in states with higher per capita Medicaid expenditures on children were more likely to report receipt of special education services. Only two state capacity measures were associated explicitly with Title V: states with higher generalist physician to population ratios were associated with a greater likelihood of parent report of having heard of Title V and states with higher per capita gross state product were less likely to be associated with a report of using Title V services, conditional on having heard of Title V. The state level measure of family participation in Title V governance was negatively associated with receipt of care coordination and having used Title V services. The measures of state economic, political, health systems, and Title V capacity that we have analyzed are only weakly associated with the well-being of children with special health care needs. If Congress and other policymakers increase the expectations of the states in assuring that the needs of CSHCN and their families are addressed, it is essential to be cognizant of the capacities of the states to undertake that role.

Keywords

Children with special health care needs State systems of care State capacity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Michelle Mayer, a fine friend and exemplary scholar. We appreciate the guidance provided by Virginia Gray to enhance our understanding of the measurement of state-level capacities. This work was supported by HRSA/MCHB grant R40MC04295-01-00.

References

  1. 1.
    National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McPherson, M., Arango, P., Fox, H., Lauver, C., McManus, M., Newacheck, P., et al. (1998). A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics, 102, 137–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maternal and Child Health Bureau (2003). Maternal and child health services title V block grant program: Guidance and forms for the title V application/annual report. Rockville, MD: MCHB.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ireys, H., Anderson, G., Shaffer, T., & Neff, J. (1997). Expenditures for care of children with chronic illnesses enrolled in the Washington State Medicaid Program, fiscal year 1993. Pediatrics, 100, 197–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Centers for Disease Control. SLAITS: Children with Special Health Care Needs Module. National Center for Health Statistics http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/slaits/cshcn.htm.
  6. 6.
    Kawachi, I., Kennedy, B., et al. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. ASPH, 87, 1491–1498.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bird, S., & Bauman, K. (1995). The relationship between structural and health services variables and state-level infant mortality in the United States. AJPH, 85, 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer, M., Clark, S., et al. (1999). The role of state policies and programs in buffering the effects of poverty on children’s immunization receipt. AJPH, 89, 164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perrin, J., Ettner, S., et al. (1998). State variations in supplemental security income enrollment for children and adolescents. AJPH, 88, 928–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayer, M., Skinner, A., & Slifkin, R. (2004). Unmet need for routine and specialty care: data from the national survey of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics, 113, e109–e115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blumberg, S. J., & Bramlett, M. D. (2005). Comparing states on outcomes for children with special health care needs. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 9S, S121–S128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Margolis, L. H., Mayer, M. L., Clark, K. A., & Farel, A. (2010). The Relationship between state capacity measures and allocations to Children and Youth With Special Needs within the MCH Services Block Grant. Matern Child Health J (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Van Dyck, P. C., McPherson, M., Strickland, B. B., Nesseler, K., Blumberg, S. J., Cynamon, M. L., et al. (2002). The national survey of children with special health care needs. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 2, 29–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Health Resources and Services Administration (2000). Title V: A snapshot of maternal and child health 2000. Washington, D.C.: Health Resources and Services Administration.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haley, J., & Kenney, G. (2007). Low-income uninsured children with special health care needs: Why aren’t they enrolled in public health insurance programs? Pediatrics, 119, 60–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lewis H. Margolis
    • 1
  • Michelle Mayer
    • 2
  • Kathryn A. Clark
    • 1
  • Anita M. Farel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Maternal and Child HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Policy and Administration and the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations