Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 189–198 | Cite as

Factors Influencing Childbearing Decisions and Knowledge of Perinatal Risks among Canadian Men and Women

  • Suzanne Tough
  • Karen Benzies
  • Nonie Fraser-Lee
  • Christine Newburn-Cook
Original Paper


Background: Women age 35 and older account for an increasing proportion of births and are at increased risk of having difficulties conceiving and of delivering a multiple birth, low birth weight infant, and/or preterm infant. Little is known about men’s and women’s understanding of the maternal age related risks to pregnancy.Objectives: 1) To determine the factors influencing the timing of childbearing for non-parenting men and women, 2) to determine knowledge among non-parenting men and women about maternal age-related reproductive risks, the consequences of low birth weight and multiple birth, and issues related to infertility, and 3) to determine characteristics associated with limited knowledge of these reproductive risks.Methods: An age-stratified random sample of individuals, aged 20–45 years and without children, completed a computer-assisted telephone interview from two urban regions of Alberta, Canada (1006 women and 500 men).Results: Factors that influenced timing of childbearing for both men and women included: financial security (85.8%) and partner suitability to parent (80.2%). Over 70% of men and women recognized the direct relationship between older maternal age and conception difficulties. Less than half knew that advanced maternal age increased the risk of stillbirth, caesarean delivery, multiple birth and preterm delivery.Conclusions: Poor understanding of the links between childbearing after age 35, pregnancy complications and increased risk of adverse infant outcomes limits adults’ ability to make informed decisions about timing of childbearing.


Reproduction Knowledge Decision making Pregnancy 


  1. 1.
    Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Park MM. Births: Final data for 2000. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2002;50(5):1–101.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Astolfi P, Zonta LA. Delayed maternity and risk at delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2002;16(1):67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alberta Health and Wellness. Alberta reproductive health: Pregnancies and births. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Health and Wellness; 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tough SC, Newburn-Cook C, Johnston DW, Svenson LW, Rose S, Belik J. Delayed childbearing and its impact on population rate changes in lower birth weight, multiple birth, and preterm delivery. Pediatrics 2002;109(3):399–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ziadeh SM. Maternal and perinatal outcome in nulliparous women aged 35 and older. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2002;54(1):6–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tough SC, Tofflemire K. Maternal risk factors in relationship to birth outcome, Alberta 1997–2001. Prepared for Health Surveillance, Alberta Health and Wellness; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tough S, Svenson L, Schopflocher D. Maternal risk factors in relationship to birth outcome. Edmonton, AB: Health Surveillance, Alberta Health; 1999. Report No.: ISBN 0-7785-0207-4.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Health Canada. Canadian perinatal health report, 2003. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada; 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nicoletti C, Tanturri ML. Differences in delaying motherhood across European countries: Empirical evidence from the ECHP. Colchester, UK: University of Essex; 2005. Report No.: paper 2005-4.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dion KK. Delayed parenthood and women’s expectations about the transition to parenthood. Int J Behav Dev 1995;18(2):315–33.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansen JP. Older maternal age and pregnancy outcome: a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1986;41(11):726–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mansfield PK, McCool W. Toward a better understanding of the `advanced maternal age’ factor. Health Care Women Int 1989;10(4):395–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wu Z, MacNeil L. Education, work, and childbearing after age 30. J Com Fam Stud 2003;33:191–213.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janz N, Champion V, Strecher V. The health belief model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis F, editors. Health behavior and health education. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson K, Lero D, Rooney J. Work-Life Compendium 2001: 150 Canadian Statistics on Work, Family, and Well-Being. Guelph, ON, Canada: Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being, University of Guelph; 2001. Report No.: ISBN 0-88955-517-6.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chalmers B, Meyer D. What men say about pregnancy, birth and parenthood. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 1996;17(1):47–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dudgeon MR, Inhorn MC. Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: Medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med 2004;59(7):1379–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laing LM. Declining fertility in a religious isolate: The Hutterite population of Alberta, Canada,1951–1971. Hum Biol 1980;52(2):288–310.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 2002;17(5):1399–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menken J, Trussell J, Larsen U. Age and infertility. Science 1986;233(4771):1389–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heffner LJ. Advanced maternal age---how old is too old? N Engl J Med 2004;351(19):1927–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hollier LM, Leveno KJ, Kelly MA, MCIntire DD, Cunningham FG. Maternal age and malformations in singleton births. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96(5 Pt 1):701–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Forrester MB, Merz RD. Maternal age-specific down syndrome rates by maternal race/ethnicity, Hawaii, 1986–2000. Birth Defects Res 2003;67(9):625–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jacobsson B, Ladfors L, Milsom I. Advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104(4):727–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barton JR, Bergauer NK, Jacques DI, Coleman SK, Stanziano GJ, Sibai BM. Does advanced maternal age affect pregnancy outcome in women with mild hypertension remote from term? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176(6):1236–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sibai BM, Ewell M, Levine RJ, Klebanoff MA, Esterlitz J, Catalano PM, Goldenberg RL, Joffe G. Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) study group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177(5):1003–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bobrowski RA, Bottoms SF. Underappreciated risks of the elderly multipara. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;172(6):1764–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dildy GA, Jackson GM, Fowers GK, Oshiro BT, Varner MW, Clark SL. Very advanced maternal age: Pregnancy after age 45. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175(3 Pt 1):668–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Main DM, Main EK, Moore DH. The relationship between maternal age and uterine dysfunction: A continuous effect throughout reproductive life. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182(6):1312–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aldous MB, Edmonson MB. Maternal age at first childbirth and risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery in Washington State. JAMA 1993;270(21):2574–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roberts CL, Algert CS, March LM. Delayed childbearing–are there any risks? Med J Aust 1994;160(9):539–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Steegers-Theunissen RP, Zwertbroek WM, Huisjes AJ, Kanhai HH, Bruinse HW, Merkus HM. Multiple birth prevalence in The Netherlands. Impact of maternal age and assisted reproductive techniques. J Reprod Med 1998;43(3):173–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tough SC, Svenson LW, Johnston DW, Schopflocher D. Characteristics of preterm delivery and low birth weight among 113,994 infants in Alberta: 1994–1996. Can J Public Health 2001;92(4):276–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Blondel B, Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Dattani N, Kramer MS, Macfarlane A, Wen SW. The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birth weight: An international study. Am J Public Health 2002;92(8):1323–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tough SC, Greene CA, Svenson LW, Belik J. Effects of in vitro fertilization on low birth weight, preterm delivery, and multiple birth. J Pediatr 2000;136(5):618–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Newman RB, Ellings JM. Antepartum management of the multiple gestation: The case for specialized care. Semin Perinatol 1995;19(5):387–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Millar WJ, Wadhera S, Nimrod C. Multiple births: Trends and patterns in Canada, 1974–1990. Health Rep 1992;4(3):223–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Blondel B, Kaminski M. Trends in the occurrence, determinants, and consequences of multiple births. Semin Perinatol 2002;26(4):239–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McCormick MC. The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. N Engl J Med 1985;312(2):82–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Statistics Canada (2005, July 12). Births, 2003. The Daily. Retrieved from: d050712a.htmGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Moutquin J, Lalonde A. The cost of prematurity in Canada. Preterm Birth Prevention Conference: Report and Background Papers. Ottawa, ON: 1998.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M. Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 2005;352(1):9–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cooke RW. Perinatal and postnatal factors in very preterm infants and subsequent cognitive and motor abilities. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90(1):F60–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Grunau RE, Whitfield MF, Fay TB. Psychosocial and academic characteristics of extremely low birth weight (<or = 800 g) adolescents who are free of major impairment compared with term-born control subjects. Pediatrics 2004;114(6):725–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Svenson L, Schopflocher D. Birth weight and the Use of Physician Services: Results for the Alberta Children’s Health Study: Graph of the Week. 1997. Report No.: 45.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Robertson CM, Svenson LW, Joffres MR. Prevalence of cerebral palsy in Alberta. Can J Neurol Sci 1998;25(2):117–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jackson K, Ternestedt BM, Schollin J. From alienation to familiarity: Experiences of mothers and fathers of preterm infants. J Adv Nurs 2003;43(2):120–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kleinbaum D, Kupper L, Muller K. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 2nd ed. Boston: PWS-Kent; 1988.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tough SC, Benzies K, Newburn-Cook C, Tofflemire K, Fraser-Lee NJ, Sauve R. What do women know about the risks of delayed childbearing? Can J Public Health 2006;38(5):188–194.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Krueger R. Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Slade GD, Brennan D, Spencer AJ. Methodological aspects of a computer-assisted telephone interview survey of oral health. Aust Dent J 1995;40(5):306–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McCormick MC, Workman-Daniels K, Brooks-Gunn J, Peckham GJ. When you’re only a phone call away: A comparison of the information in telephone and face-to-face interviews. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1993;14(4):250–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. 2004.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hammarberg K, Clarke VE. Reasons for delaying childbearing. Aust Fam Physician 2005;34(3):187–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zabin LS, Huggins GR, Emerson MR, Cullins VE. Partner effects on a woman’s intention to conceive: “Not with this partner.” Fam Plann Perspect 2000;32(1):39–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Steinberg S, Kruckman L, Steinberg S. Reinventing fatherhood in Japan and Canada. Soc Sci Med 2000;50(9):1257–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mulitinovic S, Tough SC. Caring For Our Young: An International Comparison of Economics, Health Systems, and Health Outcomes. Prepared for the Calgary Children’s Initiative; 2001.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kemkes-Grottenthaler A. Postponing or rejecting parenthood? Results of a survey among female academic professionals. J Biosoc Sci 2003;35(2):213–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Sharpe S. Middle-aged mom. Apple 2004;16–19.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mackelm K. Kids vs. Career. Macleans 2004.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Peters D. Your get-pregnant guide. Chatelaine 2004;83–88.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    MacKenzie I. Should women who elect to have caesarean sections pay for them? BMJ 1999;318(7190):1070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Behague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: Informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ 2002;324(7343):942–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Reagan PB, Salsberry PJ. Race and ethnic differences in determinants of preterm birth in the USA: Broadening the social context. Soc Sci Med 2005;60(10):2217–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mohsin M, Wong F, Bauman A, Bai J. Maternal and neonatal factors influencing premature birth and low birth weight in Australia. J Biosoc Sci 2003;35(2):161–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Robinson JN, Regan JA, Norwitz ER. The epidemiology of preterm labor. Semin Perinatol 2001;25(4):204–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Coleman CL. The influence of mass media and interpersonal communication on societal and personal risk judgments. Commun Res 1993;20:611–28.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    French DP, Sutton SR, Marteau TM, Kinmonth AL. The impact of personal and social comparison information about health risk. Br J Health Psychol 2004;9:187–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suzanne Tough
    • 1
    • 2
  • Karen Benzies
    • 3
  • Nonie Fraser-Lee
    • 4
  • Christine Newburn-Cook
    • 5
  1. 1.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Decision Support Research TeamCalgary Health RegionCalgaryCanada
  3. 3.Faculty of NursingUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  4. 4.Capital HealthPopulation Health and ResearchEdmontonCanada
  5. 5.Faculty of NursingUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations