Maternal and Child Health Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 461–466 | Cite as

Children Who Are Medically Fragile in North Carolina: Using Medicaid Data to Estimate Prevalence and Medical Care Costs in 2004

  • Paul A. Buescher
  • J. Timothy Whitmire
  • Susan Brunssen
  • Catherine E. Kluttz-Hile
Original Paper


Objectives: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate a method of using medical insurance paid claims and enrollment data to estimate the prevalence of selected health conditions in a population and to profile associated medical care costs. The examples presented here use North Carolina Medicaid data to produce estimates for children ages 0–19 who are medically fragile. These children with serious health conditions are a small subset of all children with special health care needs. Methods: The children who are medically fragile were identified through selected procedure and durable medical equipment codes. We profiled the expenditures for all medical services provided to these children during 2004. Results: 1,914 children ages 0–19 enrolled in Medicaid were identified as medically fragile (0.22 percent). The amount paid by Medicaid for these children during 2004 for all medical services was $133.8 million, or $69,906 per child. By comparison, the average expenditure by Medicaid during 2004 for a randomly selected group of children receiving well-child care visits was $3,181 per child. The $133.8 million of Medicaid expenditures for the children who are medically fragile represents 6.8 percent of the nearly $2 billion spent by Medicaid in 2004 for all medical services for all children ages 0–19. Conclusions: This study presents a standard methodology to identify children with specific health conditions and describe their medical care costs. Our example uses Medicaid claims and enrollment data to measure prevalence and costs among children who are medically fragile. This approach could be replicated for other health care payer data bases and also in other geographic areas.


Children with special health care needs Medically fragile children Medical care costs Medicaid Population prevalence 



The authors would like to thank Kathryn Kerkering, M.D., of the Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, for help in developing the methodology for this paper.


  1. 1.
    Perrin EC, Newacheck P, Pless IB, et al. Issues involved in the definition and classification of chronic health conditions. Pediatrics 1993;91:787–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Newacheck PW, Halfon N. Prevalence and impact of disabling chronic conditions in childhood. Am J Public Health 1998;88:610–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McPherson M, Arango P, Fox H, et al. A new definition of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics 1998;102:137–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maternal and Child Health Bureau. The national survey of children with special health care needs chartbook 2001. Rockville, MD: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newacheck PW, Strickland B, Shonkoff JP, et al. An epidemiologic profile of children with special health care needs. Pediatrics 1998;102:117–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stein REK. Challenges in long-term health care for children. Ambul Pediatr 2001;1:280–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stein REK. Measurement of children's health. Ambul Pediatr 2004;4:365–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pierce PM, Lester DG, Fraze DE. Prescribed pediatric extended care: the family centered health care alternative for medically and technology dependent children. In: Hochstadt NJ, Yost DM (eds.) Chapter 11 in The Medically Complex Child: The Transition to Home Care, Philadelphia: Harwood Academic, 1991, pp. 177–90.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palfrey JS, Haynie M, Porter S, et al. Prevalence of medical technology assistance among children in Massachusetts in 1987 and 1990. Public Health Rep 1994;109:226–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stein REK, Bauman LJ, Westbrook LE, Coupey SM, Ireys HT. Framework for identifying children who have chronic conditions: the case for a new definition. J Pediatr 1993;122:342–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stein REK, Westbrook LE, Bauman LJ. The questionnaire for identifying children with chronic conditions: a measure based on a noncategorical approach. Pediatrics 1997;99:513–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Buescher PA, Jones-Vessey K. Using Medicaid data to estimate state- and county-level prevalence of asthma among low-income children. Matern Child Health J 1999;3:211–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grisso JA, Carson JL, Feldman HI, Cosmatos I, Shaw M, Strom B. Epidemilolgical pitfalls using Medicaid data in reproductive health research. J Maternal-Fetal Med 1997;6:230–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul A. Buescher
    • 1
  • J. Timothy Whitmire
    • 1
  • Susan Brunssen
    • 3
  • Catherine E. Kluttz-Hile
    • 2
  1. 1.State Center for Health StatisticsNorth Carolina Division of Public HealthRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Children and youth BranchNorth Carolina Division of Public HealtheRaleighUSA
  3. 3.School of NursingUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations