Language Policy

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 183–189 | Cite as

Language education policy in late modernity: insights from situated approaches—commentary

Original Paper


Language Policy Political Agenda Political Discourse Language Planning Critical Discourse Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berliner, D., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attacks on America’s schools. New York: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
  2. Blumenstyk, G. (2014). American higher education in crisis? What everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chilton, P. (2004). Analyzing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, M. K. (2001). Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 30(8), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conrad, P. (1997). Public eyes and private genes: Historical frames, news constructions, and social problems. Social Problems, 44(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawson, C. (2010). The crisis of Western education. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  7. Farber, B. A. (1991). Crisis in education: Stress and burnout in the American teacher. New York: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Figlio, D., & Loeb, S. (2011). School accountability. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbooks in economics (Vol. 3, pp. 383–421). North-Holland, Netherlands: Elesevier.Google Scholar
  9. Hout, M., & Elliott, S. W. (Eds.). (2011). Incentives and test-based accountability in education. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, D. C. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and the ethnography of language policy. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(4), 267–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. McCarty, T. (2011). Introducing ethnography and language policy. In T. McCarty (Ed.), Ethnography and language policy (pp. 1–28). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Moore, H. (2002). “Who will guard the guardians themselves?” National interest versus factional corruption in policymaking for ESL in Australia. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues (1st ed., pp. 111–135). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2011). The state of framing research: A call for new directions.
  14. Spolsky, B. (2008). Introduction: What is educational linguistics? In B. Spolsky & F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 1–9). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stritikus, T. T., & Garcia, E. (2003). The role of theory and policy in the educational treatment of language minority students: Competitive structures in California. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(26), 1–30.Google Scholar
  16. Taylor, M. C. (2010). Crisis on campus: A bold plan for reforming our colleges and universities. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  17. Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. (1999). The quest for better teachers: Grading the states. Washington: Author.Google Scholar
  18. Tollefson, J. W. (1988). Covert policy in the United States refugee program in Southeast Asia. Language Problems and Language Planning, 12(1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tollefson, J. W. (2014). Language policy-making in multilingual education: Mass media and the framing of medium of instruction. Current Issues in Language Planning 15(4). Available online at
  20. van Dijk, T. (1996). Discourse, power and access. In C. R. Caldas-Coulthard & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis (pp. 84–105). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 1–33). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Yamagami, M. (2012). The political discourse of the campaign against bilingual education: From Proposition 227 to Horne v. Flores. International Multilingual Research Journal, 6, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations