Advertisement

Language Policy

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 25–47 | Cite as

The co-influence of the natural, built, and linguistic landscape: indexing security

  • Caroline H. Vickers
  • Christopher Lindfelt
  • Marsha Greer
Original Paper

Abstract

This study examines physical aspects of place and how such visible aspects work to index a discourse of insecurity, including an insider–outsider binary, particularly through security signs in the linguistic landscape (LL). Our main focus is the relationship between policy and the uses of written language that appear in the LL in different census tracts in Palm Springs, California. Data includes community demographic and discourse data, geographical information systems maps, and comprehensive photography of the three census tracts, which include contiguous low income, middle-income, and high-income tracts. Findings demonstrate that the discourse of insecurity is indexed differently in each of the tracts as explicit and implicit policies are enacted in the LL based in the way that residents in each tract reproduce a discourse of insecurity. Implications include the effects that these different ways of indexing the discourse of insecurity through the LL may have on social inequality.

Keywords

Ideology Identity Linguistic landscape Power Public health 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Community Survey. (2009). US Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/acs/www/data_documentation/data_main/.
  2. Augé, M. (1995). Non-places: Introduction to an anthropology of supermodernity. London and New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). The symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3, 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blakely, E., & Snyder, M. (1999). Fortress America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bucholtz, M. (1999). You da man: Narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3(4), 443–460.Google Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Chang, G. C., & Mehan, H. B. (2008). Why we must attach Iraq: Bush’s reasoning practices and argumentation system. Discourse and Society, 19, 453–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse and Society, 17(5), 563–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtin, M. L. (2010). Languages on display: Indexical signs, identities, and he linguistic landscape of Taipei. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 243–259). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, M. (1992). Fortress Los Angeles: The militarization of urban space. In M. Sorkin (Ed.), Variations on a theme park (pp. 154–180). New York: Noonday Press.Google Scholar
  12. Doyle, S., Kelly-Schwartz, A., Schlossberg., M., Stockard, J. (2006). Active community environments and health: the relationship of walkable and safe communities to individual health. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(1), 19–31.Google Scholar
  13. Fairclough, N. (2005). Blair’s contribution to elaborating a new ‘doctrine of international community’. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feld, S., & Basso, K. (1996). Senses of place. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  16. Frumkin, H. (2005). Guest editorial: Health, equity, and the built environment. Environ Health Perspective, 113(5), 290–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hanauer, D. I. (2010). Laboratory identity: A linguistic landscape analysis of personalized space within a microbiology laboratory. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 7(2), 152–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hanauer, D. (2011). The discursive construction of the separation wall at Abu Dis: Graffiti as political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(3), 301–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Health Assessment Resource Center. (2008). Community Health Monitor 2007. Palm Desert, CA: HARC, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Huysmans, J., & Buonfino, A. (2008). Politics of exception and unease: Immigration, asylum and terrorism in parliamentary debates in the UK. Political Studies, 56(4), 766–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnstone, B. (1990). Stories, community, and place: Narratives from middle America. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kingsley, L. (2009). Explicit and implicit dimensions of language policy in multilingual banks in Luxembourg: An analysis of top-down and bottom-up pressures on practice. Language Problems and Language Planning, 33(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.Google Scholar
  24. Leeman, J., & Modan, G. (2009). Commodified language in Chinatown: A contextualized approach to linguistic landscape. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(3), 332–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). 2nd edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Northridge, M. E., Stover, G. N, Rosenthal, J. A., & Sherard, D. (2003). Environmental Equity and Health: Understanding Complexity and Moving Forward. American Journal of Public Health, 93(2), 209–214Google Scholar
  27. Low, S. (2001). The edge and the center: Gated communities and the discourse of urban fear. American Anthropologist, 103(1), 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mehan, H. (1997). The discourse of the illegal immigration debate: A case study in the politics of representation. Discourse and Society, 8(2), 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Modan, G. (2007). Turf wars: Discourse, diversity, and the politics of place. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Myers, G. (2006). Where are you from? Identifying place in talk. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(3), 320–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Naveh, Z. (2001). Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57(3–4), 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rodríguez, J. (2009). Interpreting the linguistic traits of linguistic landscapes as ethnolinguistic vitality: methodological approach. Revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada, 8, 1–15.Google Scholar
  34. Saelens, B., & Handy, S. L. (2008). Built environment correlates of walking: A review. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 6 suppl, S550–S566.Google Scholar
  35. Schiffman, H. F. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: Hidden agendas and new approaches. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Simone, M. A. (2009). Give me liberty and give me surveillance: A case study of the US government’s discourse of surveillance. Critical Discourse Studies, 6(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spinzi, C., & Terminiello, E. (2010). It’s up to all of us: Social identity in the language of public warnings. Linguistic Insights Studies in Language and Communication, 125, 109–138.Google Scholar
  39. Spolsky, B. (2004). Language policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Schieffelin, B. B., Woolard, K. A., & Kroskrity, P. V. (Eds.). (1998). Language ideologies: Practice and theory. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Thornborrow, J. (1993). Metaphors of security: A comparison of representation in defence discourse in post-cold-war France and Britain. Discourse and Society, 4(1), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Trumper-Hecht, N. (2009). Constructing national identity in mixed cities in Israel: Arabic on signs in the public space of upper Nazareth. In E. Shohamy & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2010. Crime in the United States, 2009. Retrieved June 1, 2011. http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/09cius.htm.
  44. Wæver, O. (1995). Securitization and desecuritization. In R. Lipschutz (Ed.), On security (pp. 46–86). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wenden, A. L. (2008). Planning language change: A strategy for promoting human and ecological security. Current Issues in Language Planning, 9(2), 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weninger, C. (2009). Urban pioneers in the making: Recontextualization and the emergence of the engaged resident in redeveloping urban communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(1), 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caroline H. Vickers
    • 1
  • Christopher Lindfelt
    • 2
  • Marsha Greer
    • 2
  1. 1.English DepartmentCalifornia State University, San BernardinoSan BernardinoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Science and Human EcologyCalifornia State University, San BernardinoSan BernardinoUSA

Personalised recommendations