The standard natural deduction rules for the identity predicate have seemed to some not to be harmonious. Stephen Read has suggested an alternative introduction rule that restores harmony but presupposes second-order logic. Here it will be shown that the standard rules are in fact harmonious. To this end, natural deduction will be enriched with a theory of definitional identity. This leads to a novel conception of canonical derivation, on the basis of which the identity elimination rule can be justified in a proof-theoretical manner.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Curry, H.B. (1963). Foundations of mathematical logic. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Curry, H.B., & Feys, R. (1958). Combinatory logic Vol. 1. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Fitch, F.B. (1952). Symbolic logic. New York: The Ronald Press.
Gentzen, G. (1933). Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 39, 176–210, 405–431.
Griffiths, O. (2014). Harmonious rules for identity. Review of Symbolic Logic, 7, 499–510.
Kleene, S.C. (1952). Introduction to metamathematics. New York: Van Norstrand.
Klev, A. (2017). The justification of identity elimination in Martin-Löf’s type theory. Topoi. Online First. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-017-9509-1.
Lemmon, E.J. (1965). Beginning logic. London: Nelson.
Martin-Löf, P. (1971). Hauptsatz for the intuitionistic theory of iterated inductive definitions. In Fenstad, J.E. (Ed.) Proceedings of the second Scandinavian logic symposium (pp. 179–216). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Martin-Löf, P. (1975). About models for intuitionistic type theories and the notion of definitional equality. In Kanger, S. (Ed.) Proceedings of the third Scandinavian logic symposium (pp. 81–109). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Martin-Löf, P. (1998). An intuitionistic theory of types. In Sambin, G., & Smith, J. (Eds.) Twenty-five years of constructive type theory. First published as preprint in 1972 (pp. 127–172). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Milne, P. (2007). Existence, freedom, identity, and the logic of abstractionist realism. Mind, 116, 23–53.
Prawitz, D. (1965). Natural deduction. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Prawitz, D. (1971). Ideas and results in proof theory. In Fenstad, J.E. (Ed.) Proceedings of the second Scandinavian logic symposium (pp. 235–307). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Prawitz, D. (1973). Towards a foundation of a general proof theory. In Suppes, P., Henkin, L., Joja, A., Moisil, G.C. (Eds.) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science IV (pp. 225–250). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Read, S. (2004). Identity and harmony. Analysis, 64, 113–119.
Read, S. (2016). Harmonic inferentialism and the logic of identity. Review of Symbolic Logic, 9, 408–420.
Schroeder-Heister, P. (2006). Validity concepts in proof-theoretic semantics. Synthese, 148, 525–571.
Tait, W.W. (1967). Intensional interpretations of functionals of finite type. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 32, 198–212.
The justification of =-elim given here is an adaptation to natural deduction of the justification of the corresponding rule in Martin-Löf’s type theory given in . Correspondence with Per Martin-Löf pertaining to the latter work suggested to me the conception of canonical derivation that lies at the basis of the current work. While writing the paper I have been financially supported by grant nr. 17-18344Y from the Czech Science Foundation, GAČR.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Klev, A. The Harmony of Identity. J Philos Logic 48, 867–884 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-018-09499-0
- Natural deduction