Journal of Philosophical Logic

, Volume 35, Issue 6, pp 569–585 | Cite as

Logical Constraints on Judgement Aggregation



Logical puzzles like the doctrinal paradox raise the problem of how to aggregate individual judgements into a collective judgement, or alternatively, how to merge collectively inconsistent knowledge bases. In this paper, we view judgement aggregation as a function on propositional logic valuations, and we investigate how logic constrains judgement aggregation. In particular, we show that there is no non-dictatorial decision method for aggregating sets of judgements in a logically consistent way if the decision method is local, i.e., only depends on the individual judgements on the proposition under consideration.


Aggregation Function Decision Method Atomic Proposition Agenda Condition Social Choice Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Huang, Z. (1994): Logics for Agents with Bounded Rationality, PhD thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kornhauser, L. and Sager, L. (1986): Unpacking the court, Yale Law J. 96, 82–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    List, C. and Pettit, P. (2002): Aggregating sets of judgements: An impossibility result, Econ. Philos. 18, 89–110.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    List, C. and Pettit, P. Aggregating sets of judgements: Two impossibility results compared, Synthese 140(1–2), 207–235.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Murakami, Y. (1968): Logic and Social Choice, Dover.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Post, E. (1921): Introduction to a general theory of elementary propositions, Am. J. Math. 43, 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoenmakers, W. (1986): A problem in knowledge acquisition, SIGART Newsl. 95, 56–57.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Urquhart, A. (1986): Many-valued logic, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume III, Reidel, 1st edition, pp. 71–116.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyStanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations