Advertisement

Liverpool Law Review

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 69–91 | Cite as

Public Space, Public Morality: The Media Construction of Sex in Public Places

  • Sean Hennelly
Article

Abstract

Public sex has been the focus of a number of academic texts in recent years, but while some comment more generally on how the media have presented specific forms of public sexual activity, it remains unclear how the media have constructed these undertakings. The phenomenon consists of a number of subcultures aimed at providing sexual enjoyment in public settings in different ways. There has been evidence that those engaging in public sex undertake significant risk that, while motivating for those taking part, can lead to a number of tragic consequences. Some of these consequences include physical attacks by members of the public as well as susceptibility to robbery and even abduction. This article will explore one of the possible reasons behind an unfavourable view of public sex in the public conscience- the mass media, and in particular, newspapers in the United Kingdom. The way in which the media have constructed various forms of public sex will be explored, as well as the information provided in reports, and in particular, the detailing of locations of Public Sex Environments (PSEs).

Keywords

Public sex Mass media Public space Public perception 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article was developed from the paper ‘Public Sex and the Law: The Current Situation and Media Coverage’ delivered at the Annual Conference of the Socio-Legal Studies Association in April 2009. The author wishes to thank those that helped develop the ideas for this article through discussion, and would like to thank in particular Chris Ashford and Vanessa Munro.

References

  1. Andrew, Blake. 2007. Media-generated shortcuts: Do newspaper headlines present another roadblock for low-information rationality? The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 12: 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashford, Chris. 2006. The only gay in the village: sexuality and the net. Information & Communications Technology Law 15: 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashford, Chris. 2007. Sexuality, public space and the criminal law: The cottaging phenomenon. The Journal of Criminal Law 71: 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashford, Chris. 2009. Queer theory, cyber-ethnographies and researching online sex environments. Information & Communications Technology Law 18: 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, Donald, and Lance Pollack. 2005. Whose gay community? Social class, sexual self-expression, and gay community involvement. The Sociological Quarterly 46: 437–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, David. 2006. Bodies, technologies, spaces: on ‘dogging’. Sexualities 9: 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Binson, Diane, et al. 2001. Differential HIV risk in bathhouses and public cruising areas. American Journal of Public Health 91: 1482–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne, Richard. 2003. Setting the boundaries—tackling Public Sex environments in country parks. In Planning research conference. Oxford Brookes University. April 8–10.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, Stanley. 2002. Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Coxon, Anthony. 1996. Between the sheets: Sexual diaries and gay men’s sex in the era of AIDS. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  11. Dor, Daniel. 2003. On newspaper headlines as relevance optimizers. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 695–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emig, Elmer. 1928. The connotation of newspaper headlines. Journalism Quarterly 4: 53–59.Google Scholar
  13. English, Earl. 1944. A study of the readability of four newspaper headline types. Journalism Quarterly 21: 217–219.Google Scholar
  14. Flowers, Paul, and Darren Langdridge. 2007. Offending the other: Deconstructing narratives of deviance and pathology. British Journal of Social Psychology 46: 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flowers, Paul, Graham Hart, and Claire Marriott. 1999. Constructing sexual health: Gay men and ‘risk’ in the context of a public sex environment. Journal of Health Psychology 4: 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Flowers, Paul, Claire Marriott, and Graham Hart. 2000. The bars, the bogs, and the bushes’: The impact of locale on sexual cultures. Culture, Health & Sexuality 2: 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frankis, Jamie, and Paul Flowers. 2005. Men who have sex with men (MSM) in public sex environments (PSEs): A systematic review of quantitative literature. AIDs Care 17: 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Home Office. 2002. Protecting the public: Strengthening protection against sex offenders and reforming the law on sexual offences. Cm 5668.Google Scholar
  19. Humphreys, Laud. 1970. Tearoom trade. London: Gerald Duckworth.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, Paul. 2007. Ordinary folk and cottaging: Law, morality and public sex. Journal of Law and Society 34: 520–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitzinger, Jenny. 1988. Defending innocence: Ideologies of childhood. Feminist Review 28: 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maguire, Mike, et al. 2007. The oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. O’Brien, Mark. 2006. The witchfinder-general and the Will-o’-the-Wisp: The myth and reality of internet control. Information & Communications Technology Law 15: 259–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sullivan, Gerard, and Peter Jackson. 2001. Gay and lesbian Asia: Culture, identity, community. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  25. Williams, Paul, and Julie Dickinson. 1993. Fear of crime: Read all about it? The relationship between newspaper crime reporting and fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology 33: 33–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations