Presuppositions and common ground
This paper presents problems for Stalnaker’s common ground theory of presupposition. Stalnaker (Linguist and Philos 25:701–721, 2002) proposes a 2-stage process of utterance interpretation: presupposed content is added to the common ground prior to acceptance/rejection of the utterance as a whole. But this revision makes presupposition difficult to distinguish from assertion. A more fundamental problem is that the common ground theory rests on a faulty theory of assertion—that the essence of assertion is to present the content of an utterance as new information. Many examples are presented of utterances which are felicitous but not informative in this way.
KeywordsPresupposition Assertion Common ground
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bach K., Harnish R.M. (1979) Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Birner B., Ward G. (1994) Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English. BLS 20: 93–102Google Scholar
- Burton-Roberts N. (1989) The limits to debate: A revised theory of semantic presupposition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- von Fintel, K. (2006). What is presupposition accommodation, again? Cambridge: MIT. Available at http://pragmatics.osu.edu/.
- Gazdar G. (1979a) Pragmatics: Implicature, presupposition, and logical form. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gazdar G. (1979b) A solution to the projection problem. In: Oh C.-K., Dinneen D.A. (eds) Syntax and semantics, volume 11: Presupposition. Academic Press, New York, pp 57–89Google Scholar
- Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press (Reprinted in H. Paul Grice, 1989, Studies in the way of words (pp. 22–40). Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
- Grice, H. P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 183–198). New York: Academic Press (Page references are to the reprint in H. Paul Grice, 1989, Studies in the way of words (pp. 269–282). Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
- Malinowski B. (1923) The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In: Ogden C. K., Richards I. A. (eds) The meaning of meaning. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 451–510Google Scholar
- Simons, M. (2006). Presupposition without common ground. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University. Available at http://www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/faculty-simons.php.
- Soames, S. (1982). How presuppositions are inherited: A solution to the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 483–545 (References are to the reprint in S. Davis (Ed.), 1991, Pragmatics: A reader (pp. 428–470). Oxford: Oxford University Press.)Google Scholar
- Soukhanov, A. (eds) (1992) The American heritage dictionary of the English language, 3rd edn. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
- Stalnaker, R. C. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz & P. K. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy (197–214). New York: New York University Press (References are to the reprint in S. Davis (Ed.), 1991, Pragmatics: A reader (pp. 471–482). Oxford: Oxford University Press.)Google Scholar
- Stalnaker R.C. (1978) Assertion. In: Cole P. (eds) Syntax and semantics, volume 9: Pragmatics. Academic Press, New York, pp 315–322Google Scholar
- Stalnaker, R. C. (1998). On the representation of context. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 7 (Reprinted in R. C. Stalnaker, 1999, Context and content (pp. 96–113). Oxford: Oxford University Press.)Google Scholar
- Szabó, Z.G. (2006). Comments on Kai von Fintel’s paper [What is presupposition accommodation, again?]. New Haven: Yale University. Available at http://pragmatics.osu.edu/.