Advertisement

Lithology and Mineral Resources

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 150–166 | Cite as

Evolution of the Moscow sedimentary basin in the early Paleozoic

  • T. N. Kheraskova
  • N. K. Andreeva
  • A. K. Vorontsov
  • A. Kagramanyan
Article

Abstract

Materials on the structure, composition, and facies features of Lower Paleozoic sediments in the Moscow Syneclise are discussed. Structural-facies maps have been compiled for several stratigraphic levels of the Cambrian and Ordovician. Based on these materials, evolution of the sedimentary basin of the Moscow Syneclise (hereafter, Moscow Basin) and its structure in the Early Paleozoic is traced. The Moscow Basin is divided into four segments that differ in the geological history, subsidence amplitude, and strike of main structures.

Keywords

Mineral Resource Cambrian Ordovician Sedimentology Sedimentary Basin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Alekseev, A.S., Olfer’ev, A.G., and Shik, S.M., Spetsializirovannye stratigraficheskie skhemy rifeya-paleogena tsentral’nykh raionov Russkoi platformy dlya geodinamicheskogo i geoistoricheskogo modelirovaniya osadochnykh basseinov (Special Stratigraphic Schemes for the Riphean-Paleogene in Central Regions of the Russian Platform: Implication for Geodynamic and Historical-Geological Modeling of Sedimentary Basins), Moscow: Region. Stratigraf. Komis. Tsentru Yugu Russk. Platformy, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. Dembovskii, B.Ya., Dembovskaya, Z.P., Klyuzhina, M.V., and Nasedkina, V.A., Ordovik Pripolyarnogo Urala (The Ordovician of the Polar Urals Region), Sverdlovsk: Ural Rabochii, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. Demchenko, A.S., Demchenko, B.M., and Sychkin, N.I., Modern Concept of the Tectonic Structure of the Central Part of the Russian Platform, Geol. Vestnik Tsentr. Raionov Ross., 1998, no. 2/3, pp. 5–17.Google Scholar
  4. Dmitrovskaya, Yu.E., New Data on the Lower Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Moscow Syneclise: Communication 1. The Cambrian, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 1988a, vol. 63, no.2, pp. 47–54.Google Scholar
  5. Dmitrovskaya, Yu.E., New Data on the Lower Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Moscow Syneclise: Communication 2. The Ordovician, Byull. Mosk. O-va Ispyt. Prir., Otd. Geol., 1989b, vol. 64, no.2, pp. 82–93.Google Scholar
  6. Dmitrovskaya, Yu.E. and Kheraskova, T.N., The Late Cambrian-Early Ordovician Paleogeographic and Geodynamic Setting of the Central Part of the Russian Platform, Litol. Polezn. Iskop., 1997, vol. 32, no.6, pp. 605–615 [Lithol. Miner. Resour. (Engl. Transl.), 1997, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 531–540].Google Scholar
  7. Dmitrovskaya, Yu.E., Rozanov, A.Yu., Kagramanyan, N.A., and Esipko, O.A., Local Stratigraphic Subdivision of the Cambrian in the Moscow Syneclise, Otech. Geol., 1995, no. 11, pp. 28–38.Google Scholar
  8. Geologiya i neftegazonosnost’ Moskovskoi i Mezenskoi sinekliz (Geology and Petroleum Potential of the Moscow and Mezen Syneclises), Moscow: Nedra, 2000.Google Scholar
  9. Igolkina, N.S., Kirikov, V.P., and Yakobson, K.E., Geological Formations of the Sedimentary Cover of the Russian Platform, Tr. Vses. Geol. Inst., Nov. Ser., Leningrad: Nedra, 1981, issue 296.Google Scholar
  10. Kheraskova, T.N., Bush, V.A., Volozh, Yu.A., and Didenko, A.N., Structure of the Vendian Continental Margin of Eastern Paleogondwana as a Fragment of the Rodinia Supercontinent, Superkontinenty v geologicheskom razvitii dokembriya (Proc. Conference on Supercontinents in the Precambrian Geological Evolution), Irkutsk: Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2001, pp. 286–289.Google Scholar
  11. Kheraskova, T.N., Didenko, A.N., Bush, V.A., and Volosh, Yu.A., The Vendian-Early Paleozoic History of the Continental Margin of Eastern Paleogondwana, Paleoasian Ocean, and Central Asian Foldbelt, Russ. J. Earth Sci., 2003, vol. 5, no.3, pp. 165–184 (URL: http://rjes.wdcb.ru/v05/ tje03123.htm).Google Scholar
  12. Kuz’menko, Yu.T. and Shik, S.M., Structure, Distribution, and Age of the Buginskii Sequence in the Moscow Syneclise, Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Geol. Razved., 1999, no. 5, pp. 27–34.Google Scholar
  13. Nikishin, A.M., Ziegler, P.A., Stephenson, R.A., et al., Late Precambrian to Triassic History of the East-European Craton Dynamics of Sedimentary Basin Evolution, Tectonophysics, 1996, vol. 268, pp. 23–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olovyanishnikov, V.G., Verkhnii dokembrii Timana i poluostrova Kanin (Upper Precambrian of the Timan and the Kanin Peninsula), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1998.Google Scholar
  15. Puchkov, V.N., Batial’nye kompleksy passivnykh okrain geosinklinal’nykh oblastei (Bathyal Complexes of Passive Margins of Geosynclinal Zones), Moscow: Nauka, 1979.Google Scholar
  16. Puchkov, V.N., Uralides and Timanides: Their Structural Connections and Evolution of the Ural-Mongolian Foldbelt, Geol. Geofiz., 2003, no. 1–2, pp. 28–39.Google Scholar
  17. Rozanov, A.Yu., Rovenskoe vremya. Paleogeografiya i litologiya venda i kembriya zapada Vostochno-Evropeiskoi platformy (The Rovno Time: Paleogeography and Lithology of the Vendian-Cambrian in the Western East European Craton), Moscow: Nauka, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Ruzhentsev, S.V., Geptulkabirov, M.M., and Aristov, V.A., The Age of Siliceous and Volcanogenic Siliceous Rocks in the Lemvin Zone of the Polar Urals, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1996, vol. 349, no.1, pp. 78–80 [Dokl. Earth Sci. (Engl. Transl.), 1996, vol. 349, no. 5, pp. 760–762].Google Scholar
  19. Scotese, C.R., Continental Drift. Paleomap Project, Arlington: Dept. Geol., Univ. Texas, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Sturt, B.A. and Roberts, D., Caledonides of Northernmost Norway (Finnmark), Caledonian-Appalachian Orogen of the North Atlantic Region, Ottawa: Energy Resour. Canada, 1978, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
  21. Volkova, N.A. and Kir’yakov, V.V., Regional Stratigraphic Scheme of Middle Cambrian Rocks in the East European Craton, Stratigr. Geol. Korrelyatsiya, 1995, vol. 3, no.5, pp. 66–74.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK “Nauka/Interperiodica” 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. N. Kheraskova
    • 1
  • N. K. Andreeva
    • 2
  • A. K. Vorontsov
    • 2
  • A. Kagramanyan
    • 2
  1. 1.Geological Institute, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.YaroslavlRussia

Personalised recommendations