Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A competing risks model for correlated data based on the subdistribution hazard

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Family-based follow-up study designs are important in epidemiology as they enable investigations of disease aggregation within families. Such studies are subject to methodological complications since data may include multiple endpoints as well as intra-family correlation. The methods herein are developed for the analysis of age of onset with multiple disease types for family-based follow-up studies. The proposed model expresses the marginalized frailty model in terms of the subdistribution hazards (SDH). As with Pipper and Martinussen’s (Scand J Stat 30:509–521, 2003) model, the proposed multivariate SDH model yields marginal interpretations of the regression coefficients while allowing the correlation structure to be specified by a frailty term. Further, the proposed model allows for a direct investigation of the covariate effects on the cumulative incidence function since the SDH is modeled rather than the cause specific hazard. A simulation study suggests that the proposed model generally offers improved performance in terms of bias and efficiency when a sufficient number of events is observed. The proposed model also offers type I error rates close to nominal. The method is applied to a family-based study of breast cancer when death in absence of breast cancer is considered a competing risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bender R, Augustin T, Blettner M (2005) Generating survival times to simulate Cox proportional hazards models. Stat Med 24: 1715–1723

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Kramer J, Greene M, Rosenberg P (2008) Competing risks analysis of correlated failure time data. Biometrics 64: 172–179

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Fine J (2008) Nonparametric estimation of cause-specific cross hazard ratio with bivariate competing risks data. Biometrika 95: 233–240

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Fine J, Kosorok M (2007) Nonparametric association analysis of bivariate competing-risks data. J Am Stat Assoc 102: 1407–1415

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton D (1978) A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence. Biometrika 65: 141–151

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton D, Cuzick (1985) Multivariate generalizations of the proportional hazards model. J R Stat Soc Ser A 148: 82–117

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fine J, Gray R (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94: 486–509

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glidden D (2000) A two-stage estimator of the dependence parameter for the Clayton-Oakes model. Lifetime Data Anal 6: 141–156

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glidden D, Self S (1999) Semiparametric likelihood estimation in the Clayton-Oakes failure time model. Scand J Stat 26: 363–372

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glidden D, Vittinghoff E (2004) Modeling clustered survival data from multicenter clinical trials. Stat Med 23: 369–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray R (1988) A class of k-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 16: 1141–1154

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hougaard P (2000) Analysis of multivariate survival data. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu L, Gorfine M, Malone K (2007) On robustness of marginal regression coefficient estimates and hazard functions in multivariate survival analysis of family data when the frailty distribution is mis-specified. Stat Med 26: 4657–4678

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kalbfleisch J, Prentice R (2002) The statistical analysis of failure time data. 2. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katsahian S, Resche-Rigon M, Chevret S, Porcher R (2006) Analysing multicentre competing risks data with a mixed proportional hazards model for the subdistribution. Stat Med 25: 4267–4278

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Klein J (1992) Semiparametric estimation of random effects using the Cox model based on the EM algorithm. Biometrics 48: 795–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer J, Velazquez I, Chen B, Rosenberg P, Struewing J, Green M (2005) Prophylactic oophorectomy reduces breast cancer penetrance during prospective long-term follow-up of BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 23: 8629–8635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemis L (1987) Variate generation for accelerated life and proportional hazards models. Oper Res 35: 892–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leemis L, Shih LH, Reynertson K (1990) Variate generation for accelerated life and proportional hazards models with time dependent covariates. Stat Probab Lett 10: 335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin D (2007) On the Breslow estimator. Lifetime Data Anal 13: 471–480

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen G, Gill R, Andersen P, Sørensen T (1992) A counting process approach to maximum likelihood estimation in frailty models. Scand J Stat 18: 25–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakes D (1989) Bivariate survival models induced by frailties. J Am Stat Assoc 84: 487–493

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pepe M, Mori M (1993) Kaplan–Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data. Stat Med 12: 737–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintilie M (2006) Competing risks: a practical perspective. Wiley, England

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pipper C, Martinussen T (2003) A likelihood based estimating equation for the Clayton-Oakes model with marginal proportional hazards. Scand J Stat 30: 509–521

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team: (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter J, Smith A, Dávilla M, Sigurdson A, Giusti R, Pinede M, Doody M, Tucker M, Greene M, Zhang J, Struewing J (2005) Mutational analysis of the BRCA1-interacting genes ZNF350/ZBRK1 and BRIP1/BACH1 among BRCA1 and BRCA2-negative probands from breast-ovarian cancer families and among early-onset breast cancer cases and reference individuals. Hum Mutat 22: 121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih J, Louis T (1995) Assessing gamma frailty models for clustered failure time data. Lifetime Data Anal 1: 205–220

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Struewing J, Brody L, Erdos M, Kase R, Giambarresi T, Smith S, Collins F, Tucker M (1995) Detection of eight BRCA1 mutations in 10 breast/ovarian cancer families, including 1 family with male breast cancer. Am J Hum Genet 57: 1–7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie N. Dixon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, S.N., Darlington, G.A. & Desmond, A.F. A competing risks model for correlated data based on the subdistribution hazard. Lifetime Data Anal 17, 473–495 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-011-9198-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-011-9198-9

Keywords

Navigation