Skip to main content
Log in

A case study comparing the influence of LED and fluorescent lighting on early childhood student engagement in a classroom setting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies suggest that the learning environment can act as a third teacher in contributing towards student academic success. A variable within the physical learning environment that has received little attention in the literature is the interior lighting. Because of budget constraints and age, most American public school classrooms have fluorescent lighting fixtures installed. A new lighting technology, Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs), is becoming popular in commercial facilities across the United States because of energy efficiency. Previous research has demonstrated that lighting influences adult worker productivity and mood in a workplace. However, because children process stimuli faster, it is unknown whether LED lighting would have the same influence in a learning environment. Researchers hypothesise that students display more engaged behaviours in classrooms lit with LEDs as compared with fluorescent lighting fixtures. The current study tested this hypothesis by observing child engagement behaviours in a pre-K classroom under LED lighting and fluorescent lighting fixtures to compare differences. Students displayed more engaged behaviours under the LED lighting condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barkmann, C., Wessolowski, N., & Schulte-Markwort, M. (2012). Applicability and efficacy of variable light in schools. Physiology and Behavior, 105, 621–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellia, L., Bisenga, F., & Spada, G. (2011). Lighting in indoor environments: Visual and non-visual effects of lightsources with different spectral power distributions. Building and Environment, 46, 1984–1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, K., & Suk, H. (2016). Dynamic lighting system for the learning environment: Performance of elementary students. Optics Society of America, 24(10), 907–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, B., & Fisher, K. (2014). The evaluation of physical learning environments: A critical review of the literature. Learning Environments Research, 17, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Kort, Y., & Veitch, J. (2014). From blind spot into the spotlight. Introduction to the special issue: Light, lighting, and human behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 39, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufur, M., Parcel, T., & Mckune, B. (2008). Capital and context: Using social capital at home and at school to predict child social adjustment. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 49(2), 146–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Early, D., Barbarin, O., Bryant, B., Burchinal, M., Chang, F., Clifford, R., et al. (2005). Pre-kindergarten in eleven states: NCEDL’s multi-state study of prekindergarten and state-wide early education programs (sweep) study. Retrieved December 1, 2005 from http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~ncedl/pdfs/SWEEP_MS_summary_final.pdf.

  • Evans, G. (2006). Child development and the physical environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 421–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, A., Godwin, K., & Seltman, H. (2014). Visual environment, attention allocation, and learning in young children: When too much of a good thing may be bad. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1362–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614533801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawes, B., Brunye, T., Mahoney, C., Sullivan, J., & Aall, C. (2012). Effects of four workplace lighting technologies on perception, cognition, and affective state. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42, 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen, J. (2010). Green buildings, organizational success and occupant productivity. Building Research and Information, 28(5), 353–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illuminating Engineering Society. (2011). The lighting handbook tenth edition: Reference and application. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illuminating Engineering Society. (2014). American national standard practice on lighting for educational facilities. New York: Illuminating Engineering Society of North America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keis, O., Helbig, H., Streb, J., & Hille, K. (2014). Influence of blue-enriched classroom lighting on students’ cognitive performance. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3, 86–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez, I. (2014). Affective and cognitive reactions to subliminal flicker from fluorescent lighting. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez, I., & Kers, C. (2000). Effects of indoor lighting, gender, and age on mood and cognitive performance. Environment and Behavior, 23(6), 817–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretschmer, V., Schmidt, K. H., & Griefahn, B. (2012). Bright light effects on working memory, sustained attention and concentration of elderly night shift workers. Lighting Research and Technology, 44, 316–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrl, S., Gerstmeyer, K., Jacob, J., Frieling, H., Henkel, A., Meyrer, R., et al. (2007). Rapid communication: Blue light improves cognitive performance. Journal of Neural Transmission, 114, 457–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, K., & Maguire, B. (2012). Design considerations for the autism spectrum disorder-friendly Key Stage 1 classroom. Support for Learning, 27(3), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McColl, S., & Veitch, J. (2001). Full-spectrum fluorescent lighting: a review of its effects on physiology and health. Psychological Medicine, 31, 949–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milkie, M., & Warner, C. (2011). Classroom learning environments and the mental health of first grade children. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Allen, J. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulay, A., Read, M., Tural, E., & Lee, S. (2016). Examining student behavior under two correlated color temperature levels of lighting in an elementary school classroom. Educational Planning, 23(3), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, S., Howes, C., Kraft-Sayre, M., & Weiser, B. (2001). Emergent Academic Snapshot Scale. Los Angeles: UCLA (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder-Yu, G. (2008). Documentation: Ideas and applications from the Reggio Emilia approach. Teaching Artist Journal, 6(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15411790801910735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvania. (2000). Spectral power distributions of Sylvania fluorescent lamps. Danvers, MA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, P. (2014). If the environment is the third teacher, what is it teaching us? In L. P. Kuh (Ed.), Thinking critically about environments for young children: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 33–48). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uline, C., Wolsey, T., Tschannen-Moran, M., & Lin, C. (2010). Improving the physical and social environment of school: A question of equity. Journal of School Leadership, 20, 597–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Fast facts. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=84.

  • U.S. Department of Energy. (2013). Building technologies office solid-state lighting technology fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/publications/pdfs/ssl/opticalsafety_fact-sheet.pdf.

  • U.S. Environment Protection Agency. (2011). Energy efficiency programs in K-12 schools: A guide to developing and implementing greenhouse gas reduction programs. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/k-12_guide.pdf.

  • Wang, Q., Xu, H., Gong, R., & Cai, J. (2015). Investigation of visual fatigue under LED lighting based on reading task. Optik, 126, 1433–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, M., Houser, K., Orland, B., Lang, D., Ram, N., Sliwinski, M., et al. (2014). Field study of office worker responses to fluorescent lighting of different CCT and lumen output. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 39, 62–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yam, F., & Hassan, Z. (2005). Innovative advances in LED technology. Microelectronics Journal, 36, 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alana Pulay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pulay, A., Williamson, A. A case study comparing the influence of LED and fluorescent lighting on early childhood student engagement in a classroom setting. Learning Environ Res 22, 13–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9263-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9263-3

Keywords

Navigation